Skip to main content

Analyticity versus fuzziness

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Bibliography

The 12 basic items in chronological order

  1. Morton G. White, ‘The Analytic and Synthetic: an Untenable Dualism’ in John Dewey: Philosopher of Science and Freedom, The Dial Press, New York, 1950, pp. 316–330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. V. O. Quine, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, The Philosophical Review 60 (1951) 20–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benson Mates, ‘Analytic Sentences’, The Philosophical Review 60 (1951) 525–534.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John G. Kemeny, ‘Extension of the Methods of Inductive Logic’, Philosophical Studies 3 (1952) 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. M. Martin, ‘On ‘Analytic’’, Philosophical Studies 3 (1952) 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rudolf Carnap, ‘Meaning Postulates’, Philosophical Studies 3 (1952) 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John G. Kemeny, Reviews of, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (1952) 281–284.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John G. Kemeny, Review of, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (1954) 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  10. John G. Kemeny, ‘A New Approach to Semantics’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1956) 1–27 and 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. P. Grice and P. F. Strawson, ‘In Defense of a Dogma’, The Philosophical Review 65 (1956) 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morton G. White, Toward Reunion' in Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Bibliography

  1. Rudolf Carnap, Introduction to Semantics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carl G. Hempel, Review of ‘ The Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (1951) 210–211.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carl G. Hempel and Paul Oppenheim. Studies in the Logic of Explanation', Philosophy of Science 15 (1948) 135–175.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leon Henkin, ‘Completeness in the Theory of Types’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (1950) 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John G. Kemeny, ‘The Use of Simplicity in Induction’, The Philosophical Review 62 (1953) 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alfred Tarski, ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica 1 (1936) 261–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is indebted to T. J. Duggan for constructive criticism of an earlier version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemeny, J.G. Analyticity versus fuzziness. Synthese 15, 57–80 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484841

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484841