Skip to main content
Log in

Ambiguity, generality, and indeterminacy: Tests and definitions

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem addressed is that of finding a sound characterization of ambiguity. Two kinds of characterizations are distinguished: tests and definitions. Various definitions of ambiguity are critically examined and contrasted with definitions of generality and indeterminacy, concepts with which ambiguity is sometimes confused. One definition of ambiguity is defended as being more theoretically adequate than others which have been suggested by both philosophers and linguists. It is also shown how this definition of ambiguity obviates a problem thought to be posed by ambiguity for truth theoretical semantics. In addition, the best known test for ambiguity, namely the test by contradiction, is set out, its limitations discussed, and its connection with ambiguity's definition explained. The test is contrasted with a test for vagueness first proposed by Peirce and a test for generality propounded by Margalit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akmajian, A., R. A. Demers, and R. M. Harnish: 1979, Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication, 2nd edn., revised 1984, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, W. P.: 1964, Philosophy of Language, Foundations at Philosophy Series, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M.: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry: Monograph 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, J. D.: 1984, ‘Grammatical Non-Specification: The Mistaken Disjunction ‘Theory’’, Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 433–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1989, Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics, SUNY Series in Linguistics, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M. (ed.): 1901, Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, 2 vols, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures, Studies in Generative Grammar, 2nd edn., revised 1982, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. and M. Halle: 1968, The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J.: 1973, Logics and Languages, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J.: 1988, Semantical Essays: Possible Worlds and Their Rivals (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 36), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘Truth and Meaning’, Synthese 17, 304–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1970, ‘Semantics for Natural Language’, in Visentini et al., pp. 177–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. and G. Harman (eds.): 1972, Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R., R. E. Wall, and S. Peters: 1981, Introduction to Montague Semantics (Synthese Language Library, vol. 11), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuCrôt, O.: 1972, Dire et Ne Pas Dire, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuCrôt, O.: 1973, Le Preuve et le Dire, Maison Mame, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A., T. G. Bever, and M. Garett: 1974, The Psychology of Language, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, B. S.: 1990, ‘Truth Theoretical Semantics and Ambiguity’, Analysis 50, 178–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P.: 1967, ‘Logic and Conversation’, William James Lectures, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–94, reprinted in LePore (ed.), 1987, pp. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R.: 1983, ‘In Defense of Privative Ambiguity’, Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 9, 141–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1978, ‘Dthat’, Syntax and Semantics 9, 221–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. J.: 1972, Semantic Theory, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. J.: 1977, Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts, The Language and Thought Series, Thomas Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempson, R. M.: 1977, Semantic Theory, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooij, J. G.: 1971, Ambiguity in Natural Language. An Investigation of Certain Problems in its Linguistic Description, North-Holland Linguistic Series, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G.: 1974, Semantics, Penguin Books, (Pelican Books: Language and Linguistics), Harmondsworth, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePore, E. (ed.): 1987, New Directions in Semantics, Cognitive Science Series, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘General Semantics’, in Davidson et al., pp. 169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G.: 1984, Logical Form in Natural Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J.: 1977, Semantics, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A.: 1983, ‘A Review of Scheffler (1979)’, Journal of Philosophy 80, 129–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1843, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 8th edn, abridged in Nagel (ed.), 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1970a, ‘English as a Formal Language’, in Visentini et al. (eds.), 1970, pp. 189–224, reprinted in Thomason (ed.), 1974, pp. 188–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1970b, ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria 36, 373–98, reprinted in Thomason (ed.), 1974, pp. 222–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (ed.): 1950, John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Scientific Methods, Hafner Library of Classics, reprinted 1974, Hafner Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, K. P.: 1973, ‘Ambiguity and the Truth Definition’, Noûs 7, 379–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1901, ‘Vague’, in J. M. Baldwin (ed.), vol. 2, p. 748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L.: 1984, ‘Ambiguity vs. Generality: Removal of a Logical Confusion’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14, 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I.: 1979, Beyond the Letter: A Philosophical Inquiry into Ambiguity, Vagueness, and Metaphor in Language, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. O.: 1984, Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1956, ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in J. H. Woodger (trans., and ed.), pp. 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H.: 1974, ‘Introduction’, in Thomason (ed.), pp. 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H. (ed.): 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visentini, B. et al. (eds.): 1970, Linguaggi nella Società e nella Tecnica, Edizioni de Communità, Milano, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H. (trans. and ed.): 1956, Logic, Semantics, and Metamathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. M. and J. M. Sadock: 1975, ‘Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them’, Syntax and Semantics 4, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. M. and J. M. Sadock: 1987, ‘A Non-test for Ambiguity’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17, 185–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The earliest version of this paper was presented to The Logical Grammar Study Group at The University of Alberta, which included, at that time, Matthew Dryer, Bernard Linsky, Jeff Pelletier, and Len Schubert, Among others. Section 2 of the paper was presented 25 May, 1987 at the annual meeting of the Canadian Philosophical Association (Hamilton, Ontario); and Section 1 was presented 22 January, 1900 to the Department of Philosophy at the University of Ottawa. I am grateful to these audiences and others who have provided helpful criticism and comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillon, B.S. Ambiguity, generality, and indeterminacy: Tests and definitions. Synthese 85, 391–416 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484835

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484835

Keywords

Navigation