, Volume 32, Issue 3–4, pp 373–386 | Cite as

Competence, performance and the psychological invalidity of Chomsky's grammar

  • Danny D. Steinberg


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chomsky, N.: 1955, The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Library. (Microfilmed 1961.)Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N.: 1967a, ‘Recent Contributions to the Theory of Innate Ideas’, in J. Searle (ed.), The Philosophy of Language, London: Oxford University Press, 1971. Originally in Synthese 17 (1967), 2–11.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N.: 1967b, ‘The Formal Nature of Language’, in E. Lenneberg (ed.), Biological Foundations of Language, New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  6. Lakoff, G. and Thompson, H.: 1975, ‘Dative Questions in Cognitive Grammar’, Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  7. Lamendella, J.: 1969, ‘On the Irrelevance of Transformational Grammar to Second Language Pedagogy’, Language Learning 19, 3 and 4, 255–70.Google Scholar
  8. Marx, M. and Hillix, W.: 1963, Systems and Theories in Psychology, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Steinberg, D. D.: 1975, ‘Chomsky: Form Formalism to Mentalism’, Glossa 9, 2, 218–52.Google Scholar
  10. Wells, R.: 1954, ‘Meaning and Use in Linguistics Today’, Word 10, 235–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danny D. Steinberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of HawaiiUSA
  2. 2.Hiroshima UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations