Abstract
When Adh F/Adh S heterozygote homogenates are stained after electrophoresis, considerable variation is observed in the activity ratio of the FF dimer to the SS dimer. Two Adh S strains showed a sharp, consistent difference when crossed to a common Adh F strain. Optical scanning and genetic analysis confirmed that this difference originates close to the Adh locus. Since the morphs varied concordantly in their activities on numerous alcohols, and since aging and heat-treatment experiments failed to reveal a stability difference, it is proposed that the difference is regulatory in nature, affecting ADH synthesis and primarily cis-acting. A survey of wild flies revealed additional variation in the FF/SS activity ratio. Further genetic analysis showed that the basis of this variation is not restricted to the second chromosome. Furthermore, modification of the activity ratio implies some degree of allelespecificity on the part of the modifiers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamkewizc, C. L., and Milkman, R. (1972). A multiple sample homogenizer/applicator for cellulose acetate electrophoresis. Drosophila Inform. Serv. 45192.
Bewley, G. C. (1978). Heat stability studies at the α-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase locus in population of Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Genet. 16769–775.
Danford, N. D., and Beardmore, J. A. (1979). Biochemical properties of esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Genet. 171.
Day, T. H., Hillier, P. C., and Clarke, B. (1974a). Properties of genetically polymorphic isozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Genet. 11141.
Day, T. H., Hillier, P. C., and Clarke, B. (1974b). The relative quantities and catalytic activities of enzymes produced by alleles at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Genet. 11155.
Hewitt, N. E., Pipkin, S. B., Williams, N., and Chakrabartty, P. K. (1974). Variation in ADH activity in class I and class II strains of Drosophila. J. Hered. 65141.
Lewis, N., and Gibson, J. (1978). Variation in amount of enzyme protein in natural populations. Biochem. Genet. 16159.
Lindsley, D. L., and Grell, E. H. (1967). Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, D.C.
Milkman, R. (1970). The genetic basis of natural variation. X. Recurrence of cve polygenes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 65289.
Prakash, S. (1977). Allelic variants at the xanthine dehydrogenase locus affecting enzyme activity in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 87159.
Sampsell, B. (1977). Isolation and genetic characterization of alcohol dehydrogenase thermostability variants occurring in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Genet. 15971.
Singh, R. S., Lewontin, R. C., and Felton, A. A. (1976). Genetic heterogeneity electrophoretic “alleles” of xanthine dehydrogenase in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 84609.
Thatcher, D. R. (1977). Enzyme instability and proteolysis during the purification of an alcohol dehydrogenase from Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. J. 163317.
Thompson, J. N., Jr., and Kaiser, T. N. (1977). Selection acting upon slow-migrating Adh alleles differing in enzyme activity. Heredity 38191.
Thompson, J. N., Jr., Ashburner, M., and Woodruff, R. C. (1977). Presumptive control mutation for alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 270363.
Ward, R. D. (1974). Alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster: Activity variability in natural populations. Biochem. Genet. 12443.
Ward, R. D., and Herbert, P. D. N. (1972). Variability of ADH activity in natural populations of D. melanogaster. Nature New Biol. 236243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by money collected by Jewish Community of Iowa City, Iowa, and by NSF Grant 76-01903 to Roger Milkman.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grossman, A. Analysis of genetic variation affecting the relative activities of fast and slow ADH dimers in Drosophila melanogaster heterozygotes. Biochem Genet 18, 765–780 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484592
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484592