Abstract
Salivary and pancreatic amylases from the mouse show both structural and quantitative genetic variation encoded within a gene complex on chromosome 3. Two fundamental questions prompted by this variation are whether salivary and pancreatic amylases are derived from different structural genes and whether multiple structural genes are causing the quantitative variation observed in each of the two amylases. These questions were approached by comparing the amylase protein from 12 congenic lines carrying amylase gene complexes derived from different origins. The amylases were purified by affinity chromatography employing the inhibitor cyclohepta-amylose and characterized in terms of amino acid composition, specific activity, molecular weight, and heat stability. They were analyzed by native electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels and by peptide mapping employing both cyanogen bromide cleavage and restricted proteolysis in the presence of dodecylsulfate. By these techniques, many differences in the structure of pancreatic amylase that were not reflected in the salivary amylase were found among mouse strains. Likewise, a distinct salivary amylase variant was found. These results suggest that independent structural genes exist for the two amylases. Furthermore, by all criteria used, pancreatic amylase from single strains exhibits molecular heterogeneity, whereas heterogeneity was never found for salivary amylase. We conclude that at least four structural genes code for pancreatic amylase while only a single gene, different from any of the pancreatic genes, codes for salivary amylase.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarke, J. T. (1964). Simplified ‘disc’ (polyacrylamide) electrophoresis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 121428.
Cleveland, D. W., Fisher, S. G., Kirschner, M. W., and Laemmli, U. K. (1977). Peptide mapping by limited proteolysis in sodium dodecyl sulfate and analysis by gel electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem. 2521102.
Danielsson, Å., Marklund, S., and Stigbrand, T. (1975). Purification and characterization of mouse pancreatic α-amylase. Int. J. Biochem. 6585.
Hjorth, J. P. (1979). Genetic variation in mouse salivary amylase rate of synthesis. Biochem. Genet. 17665.
Karn, R. C., and Malacinski, G. M. (1978). The comparative biochemistry, physiology and genetics of animal α-amylases. Adv. Comp. Physiol. Biochem. 71.
Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage and structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227680.
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurements with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193265.
Moore, S., and Stein, W. H. (1963). Chromatographic determination of amino acids by the use of automatic recording equipment. Methods Enzymol. 6819.
Nielsen, J. T. (1974). Pancreatic amylase polymorphism in the house mouse. A model involving several loci. Hereditas 78309.
Nielsen, J. T., and Sick, K. (1975). Genetic polymorphism of amylase isoenzymes in feral populations of the house mouse. Hereditas 79279.
Sick, K., and Nielsen, J. T. (1964). Genetics of amylase in the mouse. Hereditas 51291.
Silvanovich, M. P., and Hill, R. D. (1976). Affinity chromatography of cereal α-amylase. Anal. Biochem. 73430.
Taylor, B. A. (1976). Linkage of cadmium resistance locus to loci on mouse chromosome 12. J. Hered. 67389.
Vretblad, P. (1974). Immobilization of ligands for biospecific affinity chromatograpy via their hydroxyl groups: The cyclohexaamylose-β-amylase system. FEBS Lett. 4786.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by grants from the Danish Natural Science Research Council and a grant from the United States Public Health Service (Grant GM-19521). Part of the study was made during a 1-month visit of A. J. L. in Aarhus, which was supported by grants from NATO and the University of Aarhus.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hjorth, J.P., Lusis, A.J. & Nielsen, J.T. Multiple structural genes for mouse amylase. Biochem Genet 18, 281–302 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484242
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484242