Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 65, Issue 1–2, pp 135–141 | Cite as

Ecological chemistry of mercury contained in bleached kraft pulp mill effluents

  • Albert M. Beim
  • Elena I. Grosheva
Regular Section

Abstract

Chemistry of effluents entering natural water bodies is usually ecological chemistry. The object of its study is the influence of effluents on chemical and biological processes of self-purification. Mercury and its compounds are priority pollutants in bleached kraft pulp mill effluents. It is ascertained that Hg enters the effluents from wood and auxiliary reagents: compounds of Na and active Cl and also from H2SO4 employed for neutralization of effluents before biological treatment. At the investigated enterprise the effluents have three stages of treatment: biological, physico-chemical and mechanical. This treatment reduces the Hg concentration in effluents from 10 to 30 ppb to 0.3 to 0.5 ppb. No increased Hg accumulation by aquatic organisms and bottom sediments in the area of effluent discharge was found. Moreover, aquatic organisms grown during 1 mo in the effluents medium did not accumulate Hg in comparison with the control animals. It is found that such ecological effect is obtained as a result of inclusion the modern physico-chemical methods into the complex treatment system.

Keywords

Mercury H2SO4 Bleached Natural Water Bottom Sediment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayo, S., Suter, U. and Aeschliman, B.: 1983, Anal. Chim. Acta, 149, 321.Google Scholar
  2. Beim, A.: 1984, Problems of Aquatic Toxicology. Biotesting and Water Quality Managment. US EPA /600/9-86/024,122.Google Scholar
  3. Filippele, V.: 1987, Anal. Chem, 59, 116.Google Scholar
  4. Florence, T. M.: 1982, Talanta, 29, 345.Google Scholar
  5. Grosheva, E., Bankovski, Y., Veveris, O. and Sturis, A.: 1980, hv. AN Latv. rep., 7, 117 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  6. Morel, F., McDuff, R. E. and Morgan, J. J.: 1973, Trace Metals and Metal-Organic Interactions in Natural Waters. Ed. by Singer P. C. Michigan: Ann Arbor Sci. Publ. Inc., 157.Google Scholar
  7. Phillips, G. R., Medvick, P. A., Skaar, D. R. and Knight, D. E.: 1987, Fish and Wildlife Technical Report, 10, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  8. Varshal, G. M. and Buatchidze, N. S.: 1983, J. Anal. Chem, 38, 2155 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  9. Virtsavs, M.: 1985, Proceeding of 2nd Conference on Nuclear-Physical Analysis Methods in Control of Environment, Gidrometeoizdat, 192 (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert M. Beim
    • 1
  • Elena I. Grosheva
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Ecological ToxicologyBaikalsk, Irkutsk reg.USSR

Personalised recommendations