Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 78–81 | Cite as

Volt-amperometry of 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives

I. Electrochemical oxidation potentials of 3,5-diacyl- and 3,5-di(alkoxycarbonyl)-1,4-dihydropyridines in acetonitrile
  • Ya. P. Stradyn'
  • G. Ya. Dubur
  • Yu. I. Beilis
  • Ya. R. Uldrikis
  • A. F. Korotkova
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

It was found that compounds of the 3,5-dicarbonyl-1,4-dihydropyridine series are oxidized on a rotating platinum microelectrode in acetonitrile at potentials that are accessible for electrochemical investigation (from 0.8 to 1.4 V relative to a saturated calomel electrode). The electrochemical oxidation potentials of 41 compounds were determined, and the influence of electronic effects of substituents introduced into various positions of the dihydropyridine ring on Ep and E1/2 was revealed. The potentials obtained were compared with the peculiarities of the chemical and enzymatic oxidation of-the corresponding compounds.

Keywords

Oxidation Platinum Organic Chemistry Acetonitrile Saturated Calomel Electrode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    E. A. Braude, J. Hannah, and R. Linstead, J. Chem. Soc., 3269 (1960).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. L. Khidekel', A. S. Astakhova, N. F. Dmitrieva, S. N. Zelenin, G. I. Kozub, P. A. Kaikaris, and N. A. Shvetsov, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 37, 1483 (1967).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Ya. Dubur, Ya. R. Uldrikis, A. O. Kumerova, K. K. Kumsar, G. D. Tirzit, A. Kh. Velena, and Yu. A. Zilber, Summaries of Papers Presented at the Seventh International Symposium on the Chemistry of Natural Compounds [in Russian], Zinatne, Riga (1970), p. 682.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Ya. Dubur and Ya. R. Uldrikis, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., 83 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. D. Tirzit and G. Ya. Dubur, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., 133 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. A. Zidermane, A. M. Zilbere, R. K. Verpele, K. K. Kumsar, G. Ya. Dubar, and Ya. R. Uldrikis, in: Modern State of the Chemotherapy of Malignant Tumors (First All-Union Conference on the Chemotherapy of Malignant Tumors) [in Russian], Riga (1968), p. 237.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. A. Zidermane, G. Ya. Dubur, A. M. Zilbere, R. K. Verpele, Ya. R. Uldrikis, and K. K. Kumsar, Izv. Akad. Nauk Latv. SSR, No. 4, 77 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Bossert and W. Vater, Republic of South Africa Patent No. 6, 801,485 (1968); Chem. Abstr., 70 87,846 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Loev and R. E. Tedeschi, British Patent No. 1,167,447 (1968); Chem. Abstr., 71, 49,786 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. D. Bezuglyi and Yu. I. Beilis, Zh. Analiticheskoi Khim., 20, 1000 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Wawzonek and M. E. Runner, J. Electrochem. Soc., 99, 457 (1952).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. J. Brignell. U. Eisner, and P. G. Farrell, J. Chem. Soc., 1083 (B1966).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Ya. Dubur, A. O., Kumerova, and Ya. R. Uldrikis, Izv. Akad. Nauk Latv. SSR, No. 7, 73 (1970).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Kuthan and J. Paleček, Coll. Czech. Chem. Comm., 31, 2618 (1966).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Scholtz, Ber., 30, 2295 (1897).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. L. Kurz, R. Hutton, and F. H. Westheimer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 584 (1961).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Checchi, Gazz, Chim. Ital., 89, 2151 (1959).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Lukeš and J. Kuthan, Coll. Czech. Chem. Comm., 26, 1422 (1961).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Issoglio, Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 41, 950 (1906); Chemische Zentrallblat, 1, 408 (1907).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Knoevenagel and W. Ruschhaupt, Ber., 31, 1025 (1898).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Hantzsch, Ann., 215, 1 (1882).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Kuthan, Coll. Czech. Chem. Comm., 27, 2175 (1962).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. P. Phillips, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 2248 (1954).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Schiff and J. Puliti, Ber., 16, 1607 (1883).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. E. Hinkel, E. E. Ayling, and W. H. Morgan. J. Chem. Soc., 1835 (1931).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. E. Hinkel and W. R. Madel, J. Chem. Soc., 135, 750 (1929).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    L. E. Hinkel and H. W. Cremer, J. Chem. Soc., 117, 137 (1920).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. Ya. Dubur and Ya. R. Uldrikis, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., 83 (1970).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    G. Ya. Dubur and Ya. R. Uldrikis, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., 1015 (1969).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. von Meyer, J. Prakt. Chem., 52, 81 (1895).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    É. I. Stankevich and G. Ya. Vanag, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 140, 607 (1961).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    V. Petrow, J. Saper, and B. Sturgeon, J. Chem. Soc., 2134 (1949).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    É. I. Stankevich and G. Ya. Vanag, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 32, 1146 (1962).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    É. I. Stankevich and G. Ya. Vanag, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 30, 3287 (1960).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. Ya. Dubur and G. Ya. Vanag, Izv. Akad. Nauk Latv. SSR, Ser. Khim., 287 (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau, a division of Plenum Publishing Corporation 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ya. P. Stradyn'
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Ya. Dubur
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yu. I. Beilis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ya. R. Uldrikis
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. F. Korotkova
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Organic SynthesisAcademy of Sciences of the Latvian SSRRiga
  2. 2.V. I. Lenin Kharkov Polytechnic InstituteUSSR

Personalised recommendations