Skip to main content
Log in

Design and implementation of functional wetland mitigation: Case studies in Ohio and South Carolina

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland development offers the opportunity to replace and enhance ecological functions lost through permitted wetland impacts. Components necessary for the restoration and creation of wetlands are presented and examples of wetland construction are described to illustrate the application of wetland design. Land contours, top soil, hydrology and vegetation were manipulated to develop wooded wetlands at sites in Ohio and South Carolina. In Ohio, approximately 30 ha of former crop land/sod farm were modified to bring water from the adjacent creek onto the site and hold it to saturate soils for wetland development. A 2.8 ha ponding area and channels were constructed, berms were built to slow the exit of stormwater runoff, and trees were planted in spring 1994. The mitigation site lies adjacent to a park and high school, thereby also providing community benefits and wetland education opportunities. In South Carolina, 9.5 ha of an abandoned soil borrow pit were converted into wooded wetlands, hydrologically connected to an adjacent swamp. Native plants were removed from the 4 ha of isolated wetlands to be impacted, and were augmented with nursery stock to create the mitigation wetland. Monitoring of vegetation, hydrology and wildlife usage of the constructed system continues to document wetland development and success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamus, P.R., Clairain, E.J., Smith, R.D., and Young, R.E.: 1987, Wetland Evaluation Technique. Volumes I and II. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 206 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M.M.: 1993, Changes in the functions of wetlands along environmental gradients. Wetlands 13:65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnell, R. and Anderson, M.A.: 1986, A technique for extensive field measurement of soil anaerobism by rusting steel rods. Forestry 59(2): 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewell, A.F., and Lea, R.: 1990, Creation and restoration of forested wetland vegetation in the Southeastern United States, in: Kusler, J.A., and Kentula, M.E. (eds), Wetland creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 195–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewell, A.F.: 1986, Assessment of 5.75 acres north of Old Dike at McMullen Branch Restoration Area, Brewster Phosphates, Bradley, Florida.

  • Environmental Laboratory: 1987, Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Technical Report Y-87-1, 75 pp.

  • Gibb, D.M., and Coffman, G.C.: 1993, Soil saturation determination for wetland mitigation monitoring using “rusty rods” — a case study, in: Hatcher, K.J. (ed), Proceedings of the 1993 Georgia Water Resources Conference, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Donald A.: 1992, Creating Freshwater Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI, 266 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, D.D.: 1984, Waterlogging tolerance of lowland tree species of the south. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, vol. 8, no. 3, 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, W.H.: 1978, Rust on iron rods indicates depth to soil water tables, in: Balmer, W.E. (ed), Proc. Soil Moisture Site Productivity Symposium. U.S. Department of Agriculture, pp. 286–291.

  • National Wetlands Newsletter: 1992, Focus Issue: Wetland Mitigation Banking. Vol. 14:1

  • Nelson, J.B.: 1985, The natural communities of South Carolina, South Carolina Wildl. and Marine Reserve Dep., Columbia, S.C. 55 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Sherwood C., chair: 1990, Natural Systems for Wastewater Treatment. Water Pollution Control Federation, Alexandria, VA, 260 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.R., Cardamore, M.A., Hitsch, W.J.: 1990, Bottomland hardwood forests: their functions and values, in: Gooselink, J.G. Lee, L.C., and Huir, T.A. (eds), Ecological Processes and Cumulative Impacts: Illustrated by Bottomland Hardwood Wetland Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI, 13–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydraulic Engineering Center: 1988, Computer Program, HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles, Davis, CA.

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: 1988, National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). Biological Report 88(26.1), 111 pp.

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: 1988, National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Southeast (Region 2). U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 88(26.2), 124 pp.

  • Willard, D.E., Finn, V.T., Levine, D.A., and Klarquist, J.E.: 1990, Creation and restoration of riparian wetlands in the agricultural midwest, in: Kusler, J.A., and Kentula, H.E. (eds), Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCuskey, S.A., Conger, A.W. & Hillestad, H.O. Design and implementation of functional wetland mitigation: Case studies in Ohio and South Carolina. Water Air Soil Pollut 77, 513–532 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00478436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00478436

Keywords

Navigation