Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid wetland functional assessment: Its role and utility in the regulatory arena

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Section 404 of the dean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material, which is defined as a pollutant, into waters of the United States by requiring potential dischargers to obtain a permit for such activities. The Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines provide the substantive environmental criteria by which all dredge and fill permit applications are reviewed. The Guidelines consist of 4 basic steps: 1) evaluation of practicable alternatives; 2) evaluation of relation of discharge to other environmental standards; 3) assessment of significant degradation to waters of the U.S.; and 4) assessment of appropriate steps to minimize impacts. Wetland functional assessment is important in steps 1, 3, and 4. The use of wetland functional assessment techniques has typically been hindered by lack of time and resources, among other technical concerns, by the resource agencies implementing the Section 404 program. Functional assessment is critical to the Section 404 program since most decisions revolve around an assessment of wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands (Brinson, 1993) and the developing functional assessment procedure shows potential for being rapid and inexpensive, scientifically-based and replicable. It is based upon functional indicators which can be recognized in the field and can form the basis for functional indices. The utility of the HGM procedure is illustrated using an example from West Kentucky.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamus, P.R.: 1992, Rapid Methods for Evaluating, Ranking or Categorizing Wetlands in Statewide Wetland Strategies: A Guide to Protecting and Managing the Resource. World Wildlife Fund. Island Press. Washington, D.C. 268 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M.M.: 1993, A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, S.: 1986, Special Assessment Needs and Issues: The Regulators Perspective in J.A. Kusler and P. Riexinger (eds), Proceedings of the National Wetland Assessment Symposium, Association of State Wetland Managers, pp. 124–125.

  • Kruczynski, W.L.: 1993, Is Comprehensive Alternatives Analysis Required in All Dredge and Fill Permit Decisions? Pages 134–138, in J. A. Kusler and Cindy Lassonde (eds), Symposium on Mitigation Banking, Association of State Wetland Managers, 220 pp.

  • Kusler, J.A. and P. Riexingen 1986, The Regulators Perspective. Proceedings of the National Wetland Assessment Symposium. Association of State Wetland Managers, Association of State Wetland Managers, pp. 123.

  • Magney, D.L. and K.M. Bogdan: 1993, What are ARNIS? National Wetlands Newsletter 15(3).

  • Smith, R.D.: 1992, A Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Functions of Wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report TR-WRP-DE-3, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.D., A.P. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and P. Garrett: 1994, A Procedure for Assessing the Functional Capacity of Wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report TR-WRP-DE-? U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. (in prep).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yocum, T.G., R.A. Leidy and C.A. Morris: 1989, Wetlands Protection Through Impact Avoidance: A Discussion of the 404(b)(1) Alternatives Analysis. Wetlands 9(2), 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of the Army: 1990, Memorandum of Agreement between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army concerning the determination of mitigation under the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mr. Ainslie wrote this paper in his private capacity. No official support or endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency is intended or should be inferred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ainslie, W.B. Rapid wetland functional assessment: Its role and utility in the regulatory arena. Water Air Soil Pollut 77, 433–444 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00478431

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00478431

Keywords

Navigation