Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 69, Issue 3–4, pp 425–441 | Cite as

Alkalinity generation by Fe(III) reduction versus sulfate reduction in wetlands constructed for acid mine drainage treatment

  • Melanie A. Vile
  • R. Kelman Wieder
Article

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of wetlands for acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment, alkalinity generating mechanisms in wetlands and their abiotic and biotic controls are poorly understood. While both dissimilatory sulfate reduction and Fe(III) reduction are alkalinity-generating mechanisms, only the former has been considered as important in wetlands constructed for AMD treatment. This study was conducted to determine the extent to which Fe(III) reduction occurs and the extent to which sulfate reduction versus Fe(III) reduction contributes to alkalinity generation in 5 wetlands constructed with different organic substrates (Sphagnum peat with limestone and fertilizer, Sphagnum peat, sawdust, straw/ manure, mushroom compost) that had been exposed to the same quality and quantity of AMD for 18–22 months. These substrates had Fe oxyhydroxide concentrations of 250–810 μmol Fe g−1 dry substrate. Flasks containing 100 g of wet substrate along with either 150 mL of wetland water or 130 mL of wetland water and 20 mL of 37 % formalin were incubated at 4 °C in January and 25 °C in May. On days 0, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16, the slurry mixtures were analyzed for concentrations of H+, Fe2+ and SO42−. The bulk of the evidence indicates that for all except the mushroom compost wetland, especially at 25 °C, biologically-mediated Fe(II) reduction occurred and generated alkalinity. However, in none of the wetlands, regardless of incubation temperature, was there evidence to support net biological sulfate reduction or its attendant alkalinity generation. Sulfate reduction and concurrent Fe(III) oxyhydroxide accumulation may be important in the initial stages of wetland treatment of AMD, both contributing to effective Fe retention. However, as Fe(III) oxyhydroxides accumulate over time, Fe(III) reduction could lead not only to decreased Fe retention, but also to the potential net release of Fe from the wetland.

Keywords

Straw Sulfate Reduction Sawdust Acid Mine Drainage Oxyhydroxide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R. F. and Schiff, S. L.: 1987, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 188.Google Scholar
  2. Appalachian Regional Commission: 1969, ‘Acid Mine Drainage in Appalachia’, U.S. Congressional House Document No. 91–180, Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, P.: 1978, ‘The Acid Mine Drainage’, in J. O. Nriagu (ed.), Sulfur in the Environment, Part II: Ecological Effects, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, P. E.: 1988, ‘The Role of Anaerobic Bacteria in the Neutralization of AMD’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  5. Brodie, G. A., Hammer, D. A., and Tomljanovich, D. A.: 1988, ‘Constructed Wetlands for Acid Mine Drainage Control in the Tennessee Valley’, in Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation, Vol. I.: Mine Water and Mine Waste, U.S.Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9183.Google Scholar
  6. Fennessy, M. S. and Mitsch, W. J.: 1989:, ‘Design and Use of Wetlands for Renovation of Drainage from Coal Mines’, in W. J. Mitsch and S. E. Jorgensen (eds.), Ecological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Filipek, L. H., Nordstrom, D. K., and Ficklin, W. H.: 1987, Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 388.Google Scholar
  8. Hedin, R. S. and Nairn, R. W.: 1990, ‘Sizing and Performance of Constructed Wetlands: Case Studies’, in J. Skousen, J. Sencindiver, and D. Samuel (eds.), Proceedings of the 1990 Mining and Reclamation Conference, Charleston, WV.Google Scholar
  9. Hedin, R. S., Hammack, R., and Hyman, D.: 1988, ‘Implications of Sulfate Reduction and Pyrite Formation Processes for Water Quality in a Constructed Wetland: Preliminary Observations’, in Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation, Vol I: Mine Water and Mine Waste, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9813.Google Scholar
  10. Hedin, R. S., Hammack, R., and Hyman, D.: 1989, ‘Potential Importance of Sulfate Reduction Processes in Wetlands Constructed to Treat Mine Drainage’, in D. A. Hammer (ed.), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, Agricultural, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.Google Scholar
  11. Hellier, W. W., Jr.: 1989, ‘Constructed Wetlands in Pennsylvania: An Overview’, in J. Salley, R. L. McCready, and P. L. Wichlacz (eds.), Biohydrometallurgy: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Jackson Hole, WY.Google Scholar
  12. Herlihy, A. T., Kaufman, P. R., Mitch, M. E., and Brown, D. D.: 1990, Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 50, 91Google Scholar
  13. Henrot, J. and Wieder, R. K.: 1990, J. Environ. Qual. 19, 312.Google Scholar
  14. Howarth, R. W. and Teal, J. M.: 1979, Limnol. Oceanogr. 24, 999.Google Scholar
  15. Huntsman, B. E., Solch, J. G., and Porter, M. D.: 1978, ‘Utilization of Sphagnum Species Dominated Bog for Acid Mine Drainage Abatement’, Abstracts of the 91st Ann. Mtg. Geol. Soc. Amer., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, J. G., Gardener, S., and Simon, B. M.: 1983, J. Gen. Microbiol. 129, 131.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, J. G., Gardener, S., and Simon, B. M.: 1984, J. Gen. Microbiol. 130, 45.Google Scholar
  18. Lovley, D. R.: 1991, Microbiol. Reviews, 55, 259.Google Scholar
  19. Lovley, D. R. and Phillips, E. J. P.: 1986a, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51, 683.Google Scholar
  20. Lovley, D. R. and Phillips, E. J. P.: 1986b, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52, 751.Google Scholar
  21. Lovley, D. R. and Phillips, E, J. P.: 1987, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 2636.Google Scholar
  22. Lovley, D. R., Chapelle, F. H., and Phillips, E. J. P.: 1990, Geology, 18, 954.Google Scholar
  23. Luther, G. N. and Church, T. M.: 1988, Mar. Chem. 23, 295.Google Scholar
  24. Martens, C. S. and Berner, R. A.: 1977, Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 10.Google Scholar
  25. McIntire, P. E., and Edenborn, H. M.: 1990, ‘The Use of Bacterial Sulfate Reduction in the Treatment of Acidic Drainage Drainage from Coal Mines’, in J. Skousen, J. Sencindiver, and D. Samuel (eds.), Proceedings of the 1990 Mining and Reclamation Conference, Charleston, WV.Google Scholar
  26. Sakata, M.: 1985, Water Res. 19, 1033.Google Scholar
  27. Sorenson, J.: 1982, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 319.Google Scholar
  28. Statistical Analysis System: 1982, SAS Users Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  29. Stillings, L. L., Gryta, J. J., and Ronning, T. A.: 1988, ‘Iron and Manganese Removal in a Typha- dominated Wetland During Ten Months Following its Construction’, in Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation, Vol. I, Mine Water and Mine Waste, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9183.Google Scholar
  30. Stookey, L. L.: 1970, Anal. Chem. 42, 779.Google Scholar
  31. Taddeo, F.: 1991, ‘The Role of Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction in Wetlands Constructed for Acid Coal Mine Drainage (AMD) Treatment’, M. S. Thesis, Villanova University, Villanova, PA.Google Scholar
  32. Tarleton, A. L., Lang, G. E., and Wieder, R. K.: 1984, ‘Removal of Iron from Acid Mine Drainage by Sphagnum Peat: Results from Experimental Laboratory Microcosms’, in D. H. Graves (ed.), Symposium on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
  33. Tuttle, J. H., P. R. Dugan, C. B. MacMillan, and C. I. Randies.: 1969, J. Bacteriol. 97, 594.Google Scholar
  34. Verdouw, P. and Dekkers, M. J.: 1980, Arch. Hydrobiol. 89, 509.Google Scholar
  35. Wieder, R. K.: 1989, Wetlands 9, 299.Google Scholar
  36. Wieder, R. K.: 1991, ‘Diel Changes in Fe2+/Fe3+ in Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) Passing through Constructed Wetlands’, Abstracts, 12th Ann. Mtg. Soc. Wetland Scientists, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  37. Wieder, R. K.: 1992, ‘Final Report — The Kentucky Wetlands Project: A Field Study to Evaluate Man-made Wetlands for Acid Coal Mine Drainage Treatment’, U.S. Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  38. Wieder, R. K.: 1993, Water, Air and Soil Pollut. 71, in press.Google Scholar
  39. Wieder, R. K. and Lang, G. E.: 1982,‘Modification of Acid Mine Drainage in a Freshwater Wetland’, in B. R. McDonald (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Wetlands of the Unglaciated Appalachian Region, West Virginia University, Morgantown.Google Scholar
  40. Wieder, R. K. and Lang, G. E.: 1986, Water, Air and Soil Pollut. 29, 309.Google Scholar
  41. Wieder, R. K. and Lang, G. E.: 1988, Biogeochemistry 5, 221.Google Scholar
  42. Wieder, R. K., Lang G. E., and Whitehouse, A. E.: 1985, ‘Metal Removal in Sphagnum-dominated Wetlands: Experience with a Man-made Wetland System’, in R. P. Brooks, D. E. Samuel, and J. B. Hill (eds.), Wetlands and Water Management on Mined Lands, Proceedings of a Conference, The Pennsylvania State University Park.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie A. Vile
    • 1
  • R. Kelman Wieder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations