Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 1233–1238 | Cite as

Sensitivity of plants to acidic soils exemplified by the forest grass Bromus benekenii

  • Ursula Falkengren-Grerup
  • Jörg Brunet
  • Maud E. Quist
Part II Forest Damages and Their Causes

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the role of Al- and H-ions, base cation deficiency and N-nutrition as solely NH4 in disturbing plant growth on acid soils. Effects of these factors on growth of the forest grass Bromus benekenii were studied experimentally and in the field and compared to other deciduous forest plants. Bromus benekenii is most frequent at pH >4.5 (soil solution) and absent at pH 3.8. In a pot experiment using an acid soil of pH 3.3, raised by steps to pH 5.2 by carbonate addition, growth of Bromus benekenii and nine other species (out of 17) was limited at pH <4.1. Toxicity of H-ions to Bromus benekenii was confirmed in a solution experiment at pH ≤4.2. Al-toxicity occurred at low Al-concentrations (20 μM) in Bromus benekenii and nine other tested species. Base cation (Ca+Mg) mitigation of Al-toxicity was found in a factorial solution experiment. Our experiments also indicate that H- and Al-ions interact in a way that makes combined treatments equally toxic as concentrations of H-or Al-ions alone. Incubation experiments showed that soil nitrification is retarded in acid soils. This may affect Bromus benekenii as it was most demanding on NO3-availability out of 15 species in a solution experiment. Only 50% growth was attained in a NH4- as compared to a NH4+NO3-treatment. Comparing experimental results with field data, we conclude that H- and Al-toxicity and unfavourable N-nutrition (as solely NH4) to a similar extent may explain the acidifuge behaviour of field layer plants.

Keywords

Toxicity Combine Treatment Soil Solution Acid Soil Deciduous Forest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, M.E: 1993. Ann. Bot. 72, 607.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M.E. and Brunet, J.: 1993. Plant Soil 153, 243.Google Scholar
  3. Beyme, B., Springob, G. and Richter, J.: 1987. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenkd. 50, 406.Google Scholar
  4. Bjømstad, O.N.: 1991. Hol. Ecol. 14, 234.Google Scholar
  5. Brunet, J.: 1993. For. Ecol. Manage. 61, 263.Google Scholar
  6. Brunet, J.: 1994. Plant Soil 161, 157.Google Scholar
  7. Brunet, J. and Neymark, M.: 1992. Flora 187, 317.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, N., Danielsson, L. G., and Sparén, A.: 1992. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 48, 77.Google Scholar
  9. Darrah, P.R.: 1993. Plant Soil 155/156, 1.Google Scholar
  10. Edmeades, D.C., Wheeler, D.M. and Clinton, O.E.: 1985. Aust. J. Soil Res. 23, 151.Google Scholar
  11. Falkengren-Grerap, U.: 1995a. Ecol. Bull. 44, 215.Google Scholar
  12. Falkengren-Grerup, U.: 1995b. Oecologia 102, 305.Google Scholar
  13. Falkengren-Grerap, U.: 1995c. Plant Soil 168-169, 187.Google Scholar
  14. Falkengren-Grerup, U. and Tyler, G.: 1993a. For. Ecol. Manage. 60, 311.Google Scholar
  15. Falkengren-Grerap, U. and Tyler, G.: 1993b. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 156, 365.Google Scholar
  16. Falkengren-Grerap, U., Brunet, J., Quisl M.E., and Tyler, G.: 1995. Plant Soil (in press).Google Scholar
  17. Fennema, F.: 1992. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 62, 325.Google Scholar
  18. Giesler, R. and Lundström, U.: 1993. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 1283.Google Scholar
  19. Gigon, A. and Rorison, I.H.: 1972. J. Ecol. 60, 93.Google Scholar
  20. Hackett, C.: 1965. J. Ecol. 53, 315.Google Scholar
  21. Houdijk, A.L.F.M., Verbeek, P.J.M., van Dijk, H.F.G. and Roelofs, J.G.M.: 1993. Plant Soil 148, 137.Google Scholar
  22. Joslin, J.D. and Wolfe, M.-H.: 1992. Can. J. For. Res. 22, 893.Google Scholar
  23. Lid, J.: 1987. Norsk, Svensk, Finsk Flora. Oslo.Google Scholar
  24. Lindgren, L.: 1970. Bot. Not. 123, 401.Google Scholar
  25. Marschner, H.: 1991. Plant Soil 134, 1.Google Scholar
  26. Nilsson, S. I. and Tyler, G.: 1995. Ecol. Bull. 44, 54.Google Scholar
  27. Quist, M.E.: 1995. Plant Soil (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Rengel, Z.: 1992. New Phytol. 121, 499.Google Scholar
  29. Runge, M. and Rode, M.W.: 1991. Effecls of soil acidily on plant associations. In Soil Acidity. Eds. B Ulrich and M E Sumner. pp 183–202. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ursula Falkengren-Grerup
    • 1
  • Jörg Brunet
    • 1
  • Maud E. Quist
    • 1
  1. 1.Soil-Plant Research, Ecology BuildingLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations