Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 64, Issue 1–2, pp 365–383 | Cite as

The transient response of vegetation to climate change: A potential source of CO2 to the atmosphere

  • George A. King
  • Ronald P. Neilson
Part IV Modeling Carbon Fluxes

Abstract

Global climate change as currently simulated could result in the broad-scale redistribution of vegetation across the planet. Vegetation change could occur through drought-induced dieback and fire. The direct combustion of vegetation and the decay of dead biomass could result in a release of carbon from the biosphere to the atmosphere over a 50- to 150-year time frame. A simple model that tracks dieback and regrowth of extra-tropical forests is used to estimate the possible magnitude of this carbon pulse to the atmosphere. Depending on the climate scenario and model assumptions, the carbon pulse could range from 0 to 3 Gt of C yr−1. The wide range of pulse estimates is a function of uncertainties in the rate of future vegetation change and in the values of key model parameters.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, L.H. Jr., (1990) ‘Plant responses to rising carbon dioxide and potential interactions with air pollutants’, J. Environ. Qual. 19, 15–34.Google Scholar
  2. Auclair, A.N.D. (1985) ‘Postfire regeneration of plant and soil organic pools in a Picea mariana-Cladonia stellaris ecosystems’, Can. J. For. Res. 15, 279–291.Google Scholar
  3. Bolin, B. (1983) ‘The carbon cycle’, in The Major Biogeochemical Cycles and Their Interactions, SCOPE Report No. 21. John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 41–45.Google Scholar
  4. Bolin, B. (1986) ‘How much CO2 will remain in the atmosphere’, in B. Bolin, B.R. Döös, J. Jäger, and R.A. Warrick (eds.), The Greenhouse Effect, Climatic Change, and Ecosystems, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 93–155.Google Scholar
  5. Bonan, G.B. and Shugart, H.H. (1989) ‘Environmental factors and ecological processes in boreal forests’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 1–28.Google Scholar
  6. Bonan, G.B., H.H. Shugart, and D.L. Urban. 1990. ‘The sensitivity of some high-latitude boreal forests to climatic parameters’, Clim. Change 16, 9–29.Google Scholar
  7. Bormann, F.H. and G.E. Likens. (1979) Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Botkin, D.B. and Simpson, L.G. (1990) ‘Biomass of the North American boreal forest’, Biogeochem. 9, 161–174.Google Scholar
  9. Cofer, W.R., III, Levine, J.S., Winstead, E.L. and Stocks, B.J. (1990) ‘Gaseous emissions from Canadian boreal forest fires’, Atmos. Environ. 24A, 1653–1659.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, M.B. (1986) ‘Climatic instability, time lags, and community disequilibrium’, in J. Diamond and T.J. Case (eds.), Community Ecology, Harper and Row, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Daubenmire, R. (1968) ‘Soil moisture in relation to vegetation distribution in the mountains of Northern Idaho’, Ecology 49, 431–438.Google Scholar
  12. Dickinson, R.E. (1983) ‘Land surface processes and climate — surface albedos and energy balance’, Adv. Geophys. 25, 305–353.Google Scholar
  13. Dixon, R. and Turner, D.P. (1991) ‘The global carbon cycle and climate change: responses and feedbacks from below-ground systems’, Environ. Poll. 73, 245–262.Google Scholar
  14. Dolph, J., D. Marks, and King, G.A. (In press) ‘Sensitivity of the regional water balance in the Columbia River Basin to climate variability: Application of a spatially distributed water balance model’, in R.J. Naiman (ed.), Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability with Environmental Change, Springer-Verlag. New York, NY, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  15. Edmonds, R.L. (1987) ‘Decomposition rates and nutrient dynamics in small-diameter woody litter in four forest ecosystems in Washington, U.S.A.’, Can. J. For. Res. 17, 499–509.Google Scholar
  16. Emanuel, W.R., Shugart, H.H., and Stevenson, M.P. (1985a) ‘Climatic change and the broad-scale distribution of terrestrial ecosystem complexes’, Clim. Change 7, 29–43Google Scholar
  17. Emanuel, W.R., Shugart, H.H., and Stevenson, M.P. (1985b) ‘Response to comment: Climatic change and the broad-scale distribution of terrestrial ecosystem complexes’, Clim. Change 7, 457–460.Google Scholar
  18. Fahnestock, G.R. and J.K. Agee. (1983) ‘Biomass consumption and smoke production by prehistoric and modern forest fires in Western Washington’, J. For. 81, 653–657.Google Scholar
  19. Foster, J.R. and Lang, G.E. (1982) ‘Decomposition of red spruce and balsam fir boles in the White Mountains of New Hampshire’, Can. J. For. Res. 12, 617–626.Google Scholar
  20. Gleick, P.H. (1987a) ‘Regional hydrologic consequences of increases in atmospheric CO2 and other trace gases’, Clim. Change 10, 137–161.Google Scholar
  21. Gleick, P.H. (1987b) ‘The development and testing of a water balance model for climate impact assessment: modeling the Sacramento Basin’, Water Resources Res. 23, 1049–1061.Google Scholar
  22. Gucinski, H., Marks, D., and Turner, D.P., (editors) (1990) Biospheric Feedbacks to Climate Change: The Sensitivity of Regional Trace Gas Emissions, Evapotranspiration, and Energy Balance to Vegetation Redistribution, Status of Ongoing Research, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/3-90/078.Google Scholar
  23. Hansen, J., Fung, I., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., and Russell, G. (1988) ‘Global climate changes as forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies three-dimensional model’, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 9341–9364.Google Scholar
  24. Harmon, M.E., J.F. Franklin, F.J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S.V. Gregory, J.D. Lattin, N.H. Anderson, S.P. Cline, N.G. Aumen, J.R. Sedell, G.W. Lienkaemper, K. Cromack, Jr., and K.W. Cummins. (1986) ‘Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems’, Adv. Ecol. Res. 15, 133–302.Google Scholar
  25. Holdridge, L.R. (1947) ‘Determination of world formulations from simple climatic data’, Science 105, 367–368.Google Scholar
  26. Holdridge, L.R. (1967) Life Zone Ecology, Tropical Science Center, San Jose, PR.Google Scholar
  27. Houghton, R.A. 1990. ‘The global effects of tropical deforestation’, Environ. Sci. Tech. 24, 414–422.Google Scholar
  28. Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC). (1990) Scientific Assessment of Climate Change, Report for WGI Plenary Meeting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  29. Jenkinson, D.S., Adams, D.E. and Wild, A. (1991) ‘Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming’, Nature 351, 304–306.Google Scholar
  30. King, G.A., Winjum, J.K., Dixon, R.K., and Arnaut, L.Y, (editors). (1990) Response and Feedbacks of Forest Systems to Global Climate Change, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA, EPA/600/3-90/080.Google Scholar
  31. Lashof, D.A. (1989) ‘The dynamic greenhouse: Feedback processes that may influence future concentrations of atmospheric trace gases and climatic change’, Clim. Change 14, 213–242.Google Scholar
  32. Lettenmaier, D.P., and Gan, T.Y. (1990) ‘Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento-San Joaquin river basin, California, to global warming’, Water Resources Res. 26, 69–87.Google Scholar
  33. Levine, J.S. (1990) Global biomass burning: Atmospheric, climatic and biospheric implications. Eos 11, 1075–1077.Google Scholar
  34. Manabe, S., and Wetherald, R.T. (1987) ‘Large-scale changes in soil wetness induced by an increase in carbon dioxide’, J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 1211–1235.Google Scholar
  35. Marland, G., A. Boden, R.C. Griffin, S.F. Huang, P. Kanciruk, and T.R. Nelson. (1989) Estimates of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning and cement manufacturing, based on the United Nations energy statistics and the U.S. Bureau of Mines cement manufacturing data. ORNL/CDIAC-25. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  36. Mitchell, J.F.B. (1989) ‘The “greenhouse” effect and climate change’, Rev. Geophys. 27(1), 115–139.Google Scholar
  37. Neilson, R.P., and King, G.A. (In press) ‘Continental scale biome responses to climatic change’, in D. McKenzie, E. Hyatt, and J. MacDonald, (eds.), Proceedings of International Symposium: Ecological Indicators. Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Oct. 16–19, 1990, Elsevier Science Publishers, Ltd.Google Scholar
  38. Neilson, R.P., King, G.A., and Koerper, G. (In press) ‘Toward a rule-based biome model’, Lands. Ecol.Google Scholar
  39. Neilson, R.P., King, G.A., DeVelice, R.L., Lenihan, J., Marks, D., Dolph, J., Campbell, B., and Click. G. (1989) Sensitivity of Ecological Landscapes and Regions to Global Climate Change. EPA/600/3-89/073, NTIS-PB90-120-072/AS, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  40. Neilson, R. P., G.A. King, R.L. DeVelice, and J.M. Lenihan. (1992) ‘Regional and local vegetation patterns: the responses of vegetation diversity to subcontinental air masses’, In: Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows (Ecological Studies 92). Proceedings of Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment, International Council of Scientific Unions, Workshop on Ecotones, edited by A. Hansen and F. di Castri. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Olson, J.S. (1963). ‘Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems’, Ecology 44, 322–331.Google Scholar
  42. Olson, J.S.. Watts, J.A., and Allison, L.J. (1983) Carbon in Live Vegetation of Major World Ecosystems, ORNL-5862, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN., USA.Google Scholar
  43. Overpeck, J.T., Rind, D., and Goldberg, R. (1990) ‘Climate-induced changes in forest disturbance and vegetation’, Nature 343, 51–53.Google Scholar
  44. Post, W.M., Emanuel, W.R., Zinke, P.J., and Stangenberger, A.G. (1982) ‘Soil carbon pools and world life zones’, Nature 298, 156–159.Google Scholar
  45. Post, W.M., Peng, T-H., Emanuel, W.R., King, A.W., Dale, V.H., and DeAngelis, D.L. (1990) ‘The global carbon cycle’, Am. Scientist 78, 310–326.Google Scholar
  46. Prentice, K.C. (1990) ‘Bioclimatic distribution of vegetation for General Circulation Model studies’, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 11811–11830.Google Scholar
  47. Prentice, K.C., and Fung, I.Y. (1990) ‘Bioclimatic simulations test the sensitivity of terrestrial C storage to perturbed climates’, Nature 346, 48–51.Google Scholar
  48. Prentice, I.C., Sykes, M.T., and Cramer, W. (1991) ‘The possible dynamic response of northern forests to global warming’, Global Ecol. Biogeog. Lett, 1, 129–135.Google Scholar
  49. Schlesinger, M.E., and Zhao, Z.C. (1989) ‘Seasonal climatic change introduced by doubled CO2 as simulated by the OSU atmospheric GCM/mixed-layer ocean model’, J. Climate 2, 429–495.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, J.B., and Tirpak, D. (editors). (1989) The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States, Report to Congress, EPA-230-05-89-050, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, T.M., Shugart, H.H., Bonan, G.B., and Smith, J.B. (1991) ‘Modeling the potential response of vegetation to global climate change’. Adv. Ecol. Res. 22, 93–116.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, T.M., Leemans, R., and Shugart, H.H. (In press) ‘Sensitivity of terrestrial carbon storage to in2 induced climate change: comparison of four scenarios based on general circulation models’, Clim. Change.Google Scholar
  53. Stephenson, N.L. (1990) ‘Climatic control of vegetation distribution: the role of the water balance’. Amer. Nat. 135, 649–670.Google Scholar
  54. U.S. West. (1988) Hydrodata user's manual: USGS daily and peak values. Version 2.0. US West Optical Publishing, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  55. Waring, R. H. and W.H. Schlesinger. (1985) Forest Ecosystems, Concepts and Management. Academic Press, Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers. Orlando.Google Scholar
  56. Whittaker, R.H, (1975) Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd Edition, MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  57. Woodward, F.I. (1987) Climate and Plant Distribution, Cambridge University Press, London, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • George A. King
    • 1
  • Ronald P. Neilson
    • 2
  1. 1.ManTech Environmental Technology Inc.USA
  2. 2.U.S. EPA Environmental Research LaboratoryOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations