Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 63, Issue 3–4, pp 253–271 | Cite as

Determining baselines and variability of elements in plants and soils near the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska

  • J. G. Crock
  • R. C. Severson
  • L. P. Gough
Article

Abstract

Recent investigations on the Kenai Peninsula had two major objectives: (1) to establish elemental baseline concentrations ranges for native vegetation and soils; and, (2) to determine the sampling density required for preparing stable regional geochemical maps for various elements in native plants and soils. These objectives were accomplished using an unbalanced, nested analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) barbell sampling design. Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) BSG (feather moss, whole plant), Picea glauca (Moench) Voss (white spruce, twigs and needles), and soil horizons (02 and C) were collected and analyzed for major and trace total element concentrations.

Using geometric means and geometric deviations, expected baseline ranges for elements were calculated. Results of the ANOVA show that intensive soil or plant sampling is needed to reliably map the geochemistry of the area, due to large local variability. For example, producing reliable element maps of feather moss using a 50 km cell (at 95% probability) would require sampling densities of from 4 samples per cell for Al, Co, Fe, La, Li, and V, to more than 15 samples per cell for Cu, Pb, Se, and Zn.

Keywords

Sampling Density Wildlife Refuge Baseline Concentration National Wildlife Refuge Total Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, C. A. and Franklin, N. L.: 1967, Statistical Analysis in Chemistry and the Chemical Industry (Fifth Printing), John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  2. Crock, J. G. and Lichte, F. E.: 1982, Anal. Chim. Acta 144, 223.Google Scholar
  3. Crock, J. G., Lichte, F. E., and Briggs, P. H.: 1983, Geostandards Newsletter 7, 335.Google Scholar
  4. Crock, J. G. and Severson, R. C.: 1980, Four Reference Soil and Rock Samples for Measuring Element Availability in the Western Energy Regions, U.S. Geol. Sur. Circ. 841.Google Scholar
  5. Folkeson, Lennart: 1981, Annales Botanici Fennici 18, 245.Google Scholar
  6. Godbeer, W. C., Morgan, N. C., and Swaine, D. J.: 1981, Proceedings of the Seventh International Clean Air Conference, Adelaide p. 789.Google Scholar
  7. Gough, L. P., Severson, R. C., and Shacklette, H. T.: 1988, Element Concentrations in Soils and Other Surficial Materials of Alaska, U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Paper 1458.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, L. L., Brown, F. W., and Neil, S. T.: 1987, in P. A. Baedecker (ed.), Methods for Geochemical Analysis, U.S. Geol. Sur. Bull. 1770, G1.Google Scholar
  9. Kennedy, K. R. and Crock, J. G.: 1987, Anal. Letters 20, 899.Google Scholar
  10. Le Blanc, Fabius and de Sloover, Jacques: 1970, Can. J. of Botany 48, 1485.Google Scholar
  11. Markert, Bernd and Weckert, Vera: 1989, The Science of the Total Environment 86, 289.Google Scholar
  12. Miesch, A. T.: 1976, Geochemical Survey of Missouri — Methods of Sampling, Laboratory Analysis, and Statistical Reduction of Data in a Geochemical Survey of Missouri, with Sections on Laboratory Methods, U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Paper 954-A.Google Scholar
  13. Onianwa, P. C.: 1988, Envir. Monitoring and Assessment 11, 25.Google Scholar
  14. Pilegaard, Kim: 1987, Bioscience 24, 3.Google Scholar
  15. Ping, C. L., Shoji, S., Ito, T., Takahashi, T., and Moore, J. P.: 1989, Soil Science 148, 8.Google Scholar
  16. Sanzolone, R. F. and Chao, T. T.: 1987, Geostandards Newsletter 11, 81.Google Scholar
  17. Severson, R. C., Crock, J. G., and Gough, L. P.: 1990, Assessment of Variability, Evaluation of Industrial Emissions, and a Listing of Geochemical Data for Plants and Soils at the Kenai National Moose Range, Kenai, Alaska: U.S. Geol. Sur. Open-File Report 90-306.Google Scholar
  18. Shoji, S., Takahashi, T., Ito, T., and Ping, C. L.: 1988, Soil Science 145, 395.Google Scholar
  19. Thomas, W., Ruhling, A., and Simon, H.: 1984, Envir. Poll. (Series A), 36, 295.Google Scholar
  20. Tidball, R. R. and Ebens, R. J.: 1976, Geologoy and Energy Resources of the Powder River: Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook, Twenty-Eight Annual Field Conference, Casper, Wyoming, September 1976, Laudon, R. B., ed., 299.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. G. Crock
    • 1
  • R. C. Severson
    • 1
  • L. P. Gough
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyDenver Federal CenterDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations