Abstract
Rousseau's Emile has attracted an avalanche of critical responses. His theme of negative education, or as he defines it, “well-regulated freedom”, has been denounced as outright manipulation in disguise, which instead of respecting the child's autonomy and dignity, places him at the whim of the teacher's machinations and stratagems. His recommendation that the child's imagination be curtailed (that he may not acquire desires which cannot be satisfied) is widely held to militate against one of the most cherished goals of education: the fostering of the natural curiosity of the child. Rousseau is also accused of professing an “ideology of childhood” which ignores the real needs of children. In the sterilized environment which Rousseau proposes for the growing child, affection, praise and approval, are some of the sacrifices made to this ideology. Furthermore, his views on women are considered degrading, outrageous and blatantly sexist.
Yet despite the myriad criticisms leveled against his work, Rousseau's Emile highlights one of the most exacting challenges for education — how to educate the child without alienating him. Rousseau connects this issue with the larger problem of alienation: namely, that experienced by man within the modern social order. Rousseau's views anticipate the contemporary debate between virtue-based and deontological ethics.
The purpose of this paper is (i) to describe Rousseau's diagnosis of the problem of alienation as it arises in the various spheres of human life, paying special attention to the moral domain, and (ii) to assess the solutions he offers to the problem of alienation. These solutions are based on a conception of the good life which, I argue, is unacceptable. I also argue that this conception dissipates one form of alienation only at the expense of creating another.
The paper begins by tracing the changes which the concept of alienation has undergone, and consequently I draw a distinction between two kinds of alienation — conscious and unconscious. I demonstrate that even if Rousseau is successful in offering a remedy for conscious alienation, this very remedy itself gives rise to unconscious alienation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anscombe, G.E.M.: 1958, ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, in Philosophy 33, repr. in Collected Philosophical Papers, U. of Minnesota Press, 3: pp. 26–41.
Ben-Se'ev, A.: 1990, ‘Envy and Jealousy’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20, 4, 487–516.
Bloom, A.: 1979, Rousseau: Emile, (trans.) New York, Basic Books (All references in parentheses to Rousseau's Emile in this paper are to this edition).
Blum, L.: 1980, Friendship, Altruism and Morality, RKP.
Dent, N.J.H.: 1988, Rousseau, Basil Blackwell.
Elster, J.: 1986, An Introduction to Karl Marx, Cambridge University Press.
Foot, P.: 1978, Virtue and Vices, Oxford University Press.
Kant, I.: 1963, ‘Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View’, in L.W. Beck (ed.), On History, Bobbs-Merrill.
Okin, S.M.: 1979, Women in Western Political Thought, Princeton University Press.
Peters, R.S.: 1981, Essays on Educators, George Allen & Unwin.
Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.
Rotenstreich, N.: 1964, ‘On the Metamorphosis of the Concept “Alienation”’, The Israeli Academy for Sciences 1, 6 (in Hebrew).
Rousseau, J.J.: 1964, The First and Second Discourses, R.D. Masters (ed.), St. Martin Press.
Roznove, A.: 1986, Ideological and Eutopian Elements in Education, Ramot, Tel Aviv University Publishing House (in Hebrew).
Stocker, M.: 1976, ‘The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 14, 453–66.
Sygad, R.: 1983, ‘Rousseau — Liberty, Utopia, Serfdom’, Iyyun 32, 1–2, 41–55 (in Hebrew).
Taylor, C: 1982, ‘Responsibility for the Self’, in G. Watson, (ed.), Free Will, Oxford University Press, pp. 111–126.
Williams, B.: 1973, ‘The Idea of Equality’, in B. Williams (ed.), Problems of the Self, Cambridge University Press.
Wolfs, S.: 1982, ‘Moral Saints’, Journal of Philosophy 79, 8, 419–439.
Yonah, Y.: 1990, ‘The Rational Status of A-moral Choices’, Iyyun, A Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yonah, Y. The quest for the good life in Rousseau's Emile: an assessment. Stud Philos Educ 12, 229–243 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00468847
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00468847