Skip to main content
Log in

Use of synthetic peptides for the detection and quantification of autoantibodies

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary and conclusions

The rapid progress made over the last 10 years in the identification of individual autoantigens and in the localization of the epitopes involved, has resulted in a parallel reduction in the complexity of the antigen required for the detection of autoantibodies. The ability to use synthetic peptides as antigens is a remarkable culmination of this process considering that many antigenic particles contain multiple proteins (eg. Sm consist of 8 or more individual proteins).

Despite the fact that patients with SLE have a polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, excellent correlations between ELISAs utilizing the P2 or SmB/B′ synthetic peptides, ELISAs utilizing r proteins and immunoblotting were obtained [28, 38, 50]. However, false positive/non-specific binding to a P2-BSA-glutaraldehyde conjugate has been observed with serum from old MRL/lpr mice (unpublished observations). In addition, some of the results obtained in human autoimmune diseases suggest that non-specific binding may be problematic in some instances. It is difficult, at present, to know whether the higher frequencies of detection of autoantibodies to certain synthetic peptide antigens reflect increased sensitivity or decreased specificity.

Synthetic peptide antigens have beeen used to detect autoantibodies in both organ specific and multisystem autoimmune diseases. In only a small number of cases have these reagents been rigorously tested for sensitivity and specificity. Despite this, synthetic peptides have been shown to be valuable for detection and quantification of autoantibodies in certain clinical situations. Undoubtedly, further progress in epitope mapping of autoantigens coupled with technological advances in protein synthesis and improved prediction of protein structure will lead to a large number of synthetic peptide antigens for research and clinical applications. It is unlikely that short synthetic peptides will substitute for native proteins in all instances since some autoantibodies show a striking preference for conformational epitopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

r:

recombinant

SLE:

systemic lupus erythematosus

References

  1. Gharavi AE, Chu JL & Elkon KB (1988) Arthritis Rheum. 31: 1337–1345

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tan EM, Chan EKL, Sullivan KF & Rubin RL (1988) Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 47: 121–141

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonfa E, Llovet R & Elkon KB (1988) J. Immunol. 140: 2231–2236

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin DC, Berzofsky JA, East IJ, Gurd FRN, Hannum C, et al. (1984) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2: 67–101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laver WG, Air GM, Webster RG & Smith-Gill SJ (1990) Cell 61: 553–556

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leach SJ (1983) Biopolymers 22: 425–431

    Google Scholar 

  7. Niman HL, Houghten RA, Walker LE, Reisfeld RA, Wilson IA, Hogle JM & Lerner RA (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 4949–4953

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jemmerson R (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 9180–9184

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trifilieff E, Dubs MC, vanRegenmortel MHV (1991) Molec. Immunol. 28: 889–896

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kent SBH, (1988) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57: 957–989

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang NC, Sayer JM & Kang AK (1990) J. Immunol. Methods 129: 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pelleguer JL, Westhof E & vanRegenmortel MHV (1991) Methods Enzymol. 203: 176–201

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thornton JM (1988) Nature 335: 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bonfa E, Marshak-Rothstein A, Weissbach H, Brot N & Elkon KB (1988) J. Immunol. 140: 3434–3437

    Google Scholar 

  15. Portanova JP, Cheronis JC, Blodgett JK & Kotzin BL (1991) J. Immunol. 146: 4633–4639

    Google Scholar 

  16. St. Clair EW, Kenan D, Burch JA, Keene JD & Pisetsky DS (1991) J. Immunol. 146: 1885–1892

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lindstrom J (1985) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 3: 109–131

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tzartos SJ, Kokla A, Walgrave SL & Conti-Tronconi BM (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 2899–2903

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brocke S, Brautbar C, Steinman L, Abramsky O, Rothbard J, Neumann D, Fuchs S & Mozes E (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 82: 1894–1900

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohta M, Ohta K, Itoh N, Nishitani H, Hara H & Hayashi K (1990) Neurology 40: 1776–1778

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wadsworth HL, Chazenbalk GD, Nagayama Y, Russo D & Raporport B (1990) Science 249: 1423–1425

    Google Scholar 

  22. Murakami M & Mori M (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 171: 512–518

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mori T, Sugawa H, Piraphatdist T, Inove D, Enomoto T & Imura H (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 178: 165–172

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van deWater J, Gershwin ME, Leung P, Ansari A & Coppel RL (1988) J. Exp. Med. 167: 1791–1799

    Google Scholar 

  25. Elkon KB, Skelly S, Parnassa A, Moller W, Weissbach H & Brot N (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 7419–7423

    Google Scholar 

  26. Elkon K, Parnassa AP & Foster CL (1985) J. Exp. Med. 162: 459–471

    Google Scholar 

  27. Francoeur AM, Peebles CL, Heckman KJ, Lee JC & Tan EM (1985) J. Immunol. 135: 2378–2384

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bonfa E, Golombek SJ, Kaufman L, Skelly S, Weissbach H, Brot N & Elkon KB (1987) N. Engl. J. Med. 317: 265–271

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schneebaum AB, Singleton JD, West SG, Blodgett JK, Allen LG, Cheronis JC & Kotzin BL (1991) Am. J. Med. 90: 54–62

    Google Scholar 

  30. vanDam AP, Derksen RHWM, Gmelig Meyling F et al. (1990) Ann. Rheum. Dis. 49: 779–782

    Google Scholar 

  31. vanDam AP, Nossent H, deJong J, Meilof J, Ter Borg E-J, Swaak T & Smeenk R (1991) J. Rheumatol. 18: 1026–1034

    Google Scholar 

  32. Billings PB & Hoch SO (1983) J. Immunol. 131: 347–351

    Google Scholar 

  33. Habets WJ, deRooij DJ, Hoet MH, van dePutte LBA & vanVenrooij WJ (1985) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 59: 457–466

    Google Scholar 

  34. Elkon KB & Jankowski PW (1985) J. Immunol. 134: 3819–3824

    Google Scholar 

  35. Elkon KB, Hines JJ, Chu JL & Parnassa AP (1990) J. Immunol. 145: 636–643

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rokeach LA, Jannatipour M & Hoch SA (1990) J. Immunol. 144: 1015–1022

    Google Scholar 

  37. Habets WJ, Sillekens PTG, Hoet MH, McAllister G, Lerner MR & vanVenrooij WJ (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 4674–4678

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hines JJ, Danho W & Elkon KB (1991) Arthritis Rheum. 34: 572–579

    Google Scholar 

  39. Barakat S, Briand J-P, Weber J-C, vanRegenmortel MHV & Muller S (1990) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 81: 256–262

    Google Scholar 

  40. Muller S, Barakat S, Watts R, Joubaud P & Isenberg DL (1990) Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 8: 445–453

    Google Scholar 

  41. Barakat S, Briand J-P, Abauf N, vanRegenmortel MHV & Muller S (1991) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 86: 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lieu T-S, Newkirk MM, Capra JD & Sontheimer RD (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 82: 96–101

    Google Scholar 

  43. McCauliffe DP, Zappi E, Lieu T-S, Michalak M, Sontheimer RD & Capra JD (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 86: 332–335

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rokeach LA, Haselby JA, Meilof JF, Smeenk RJT, Unnasch TR, Greene BM & Hoch SO (1991) J. Immunol. 147: 3031–3039

    Google Scholar 

  45. Scofield RH, Dickey WD, Jackson KW, James JA & Harley JB (1991) J. Clin. Immunol. 11: 378–388

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bini P, Chu JL, Okolo C, & Elkon KB (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 85: 325–333

    Google Scholar 

  47. Muller S, Bonnier D, Thiry M & vanRegenmortel MHV (1989) Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. (1989) 89: 288–296

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bernstein RM, Hobbs RN & Lea DJ (1985) Arthritis Rheum. 28: 285–293

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tuaillon N, Muller S, Pasquali J-L, Bordigoni P, Youinou P & vanRegenmortel MHV (1990) Int. Arch. Allergy Appl Immunol. 91: 297–305

    Google Scholar 

  50. Magsaam J, Gharavi AE, Parnassa AP, Weissbach H, Brot N & Elkon KB (1989) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 76: 165–171

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elkon, K.B. Use of synthetic peptides for the detection and quantification of autoantibodies. Mol Biol Rep 16, 207–212 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464709

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464709

Key words

Navigation