Skip to main content
Log in

Methods of epitope mapping

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Concluding remarks

It is important to remember that the merits of the different approaches to epitope mapping should be judged against the purpose of the study. A peptide specifically recognized by nearly all sera containing a certain autoimmune specificity [20, 21, 26], would most likely be selected for the detection of the anti-linear/continuous epitope fraction among those autoantibodies and could be highly useful for diagnostic purposes. This is true even if a majority of the antibodies were directed against conformational/discontinuous protein epitopes. If the purpose is to study the induction or maintenance of the autoimmune response, one would also have to look at and account for the conformation-dependent autoantibodies. There is also the possibility that some pathogenic autoantibodies could constitute a small fraction requiring the complete nucleic acid-protein complex as an antigen. In that case, the ‘pathogenic’ epitope would not be identified nor mapped using the techniques discussed in this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan EM (1989) Adv. Immunol. 49: 93–151

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bautz EKF, Kalden JR, Homma M, Shulman LE & Tan EM (Eds) (1991) Molecular and Cell Biology of Autoantibodies and Autoimmunity Mol. Biol. Rep. 15: 95–216

  3. Chambers JC & Keene JD (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 5463–5467

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jerne NK (1960) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 14: 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  5. VanRegenmortel MHV, Briand JP, Muller S & Plaué S (1988) Synthetic polypeptides as antigens. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  6. VanRegenmortel MHV (1989) Immunol. Today 10: 266–272

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laver WG, Air GM, Webster RG & Smith-Gill SJ (1990) Cell 61: 553–556

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geysen HM (1985) Immunol. Today 6: 364–369

    Google Scholar 

  9. Habets WJ, Sillekens PTG, Hoet MH, McAllister G, Lerner MR & vanVenrooij WJ (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 4674–4678

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erlich HA (Ed) (1989) PCR Technology. Stockton Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pisetsky DS & Groudier JP (1989) J. Immunol. 143: 3609–3613

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frorath B, Scanarini M, Netter HJ, Abney CC, Liedvogel B, Lakomek HJ & Northemann W (1991) Bio Techniques 11: 364–371.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paxton H, Bendele T, O'Connor L & Haynes D (1990) Clin. Chem. 36: 792–797

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seelig HP, Ehrfeld H, Schroeter H, Heim C & Renz M (1991) J. Immunol. Methods 143: 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bini K, Chu J-L, Okolo C & Elkon K (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 85: 325–333

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cram DS, Fisicaro N, Coppel RL, Whittingham S & Harrison LC (1990) J. Immunol. 145: 630–635

    Google Scholar 

  17. Netter HJ, Guldner HH, Szotstecki C & Will H (1990) Scand. J. Immunol. 32: 163–176

    Google Scholar 

  18. Query CC, Bentley RC & Keene JD (1989) Cell 57: 89–101

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nagai K, Oubridge C, Jessen TH, Li J & Evans PR (1990) Nature 348: 515–520

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elkon KB, Skelly S, Parnassa AP, Danho W, Weissbach H & Brot N (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 7419–7423

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hiness JJ, Danho W & Elkon KB (1991) Arthritis Rheum. 34: 572–579

    Google Scholar 

  22. St Clair EW, Kenan D, Burch JA, Keene JD & Pisetsky DS (1990) J. Immunol. 144: 3868–3876

    Google Scholar 

  23. Houghten RA (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 5131–5135

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geysen HM, Meloen RH & Barteling SJ (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 3998–4002

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scofield RH & Harley JB (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 3343–3347

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barakat S, Briand JP, Abouaf N, VanRegenmortel MHV & Muller S (1991) Clin. exp. Immunol. 86: 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barakat S, Briand JP, Weber JC, VanRegenmortel MHV & Muller S (1990) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 81: 256–262

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berzotsky JA (1985) Science 229: 932–940

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettersson, I. Methods of epitope mapping. Mol Biol Rep 16, 149–153 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464702

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00464702

Key words

Navigation