Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery

, Volume 107, Issue 1, pp 50–53 | Cite as

Improved cementation in total hip replacement

  • K. Søballe
  • F. Christensen
Clinical and Experimental Forum


Insufficient cementation has been suggested to be the most common cause of loosening of the femoral component after total hip arthroplasty. A clinical and radiographic study of 129 consecutive, primary total hip replacements was performed 5 years after surgery, in order to evaluate the significance of femoral plugging, special attention being focused on cementation and radiographic loosening. A polyethylene medullary plug was used in 78 hips which were compared with 51 non-plugged hips with respect to the clinical course and radiographic appearance. The cement mantle around the femoral component was thicker, and the packing of cement significantly improved when the plug was used. The frequency of radiographic loosening was smaller in the plugged group but with no statistical significance. There was no difference in clinical results between the compared groups. Our results indicate that medullary plugging improves the cementation and in particular prevents insufficient cementation of the femoral component.


Public Health Clinical Result Polyethylene Cementation Femoral Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beckenbaugh RD, Ilstrup DM (1978) Total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:306–313Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bocco F, Langan P, Charnley J (1977) Changes in the calcar femoris in relation to cement technology in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 128:287–295Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callaghan JJ, salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:1074–1085Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlsson AS, Gentz CF (1980) Mechanical loosening of the femoral head prosthesis in the Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 147:262–270Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 54:51–76Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorr D, Tkei GK, Conaty JP (1983) Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:474–479Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gruen TA, McNeice MS, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 141:17–27Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harris HW, McCarthy JC, O'Neill DA (1982) Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:1063–1067Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hierton C, Blomgren G & Lindgren U (1983) Factors associated with early loosening of cemented total hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 54:168–173Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hierton C, Blomgren G, Lindgren U (1983) Factors leading to rearthroplasty in a material with radiographically loose total hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 54:562–565Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kristiansen B, Jensen JS (1985) Biomechanical factors in loosening of the Stanmore hip. Acta Orthop Scand 56:21–24Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindberg HO, Carlsson ÅS (1983) Mechanical loosening of the femoral component in total hip replacement, Brunswik design. Acta Orthop Scand 54:557–561Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller J, Burke KL, Krause W, Ahmed A, Kelegay L, Tremblay G (1979) Improved fixation of knee arthroplasty components by the injection of acrylic cement into cancellous bone surfaces. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 61:515Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noble PC, Swarts E (1983) Penetration of acrylic bone cements into cancellous bone. Acta Orthop Scand 54:566–573Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nolan DR, Fitzgerald RH, Beckenbaugh RD, Coventry MB (1975) Complications of total hip arthroplasty treated by reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:977–981Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oh I, Carlson CE, Tomford WW, Harris WH (1978) Improved fixation of the femoral component after total hip replacement using a methacrylate intramedullary plug. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:608–613Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oh I, Harris WH (1982) A cement fixation system for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 164:221–229Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pellicci PM, Wilson PD, Sledge CB, Salvati EA, Ranawat CS, Poss R (1982) Revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 170:34–41Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stauffer RN (1982) Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:983–990Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weber BG, Stuhmer G (1979) Improvements in total hip prosthesis implantation technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 93:185–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Søballe
    • 1
  • F. Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryKolding HospitalKoldingDenmark

Personalised recommendations