Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 119–142 | Cite as

A review of research related to the topological primacy thesis

  • Ian Darke
Article

Abstract

Piaget and Inhelder (1956) claimed that the young child's intrinsic geometry was first of all topological and then, later, projective and Euclidean. This theory has become known as the ‘topological primacy thesis’ and it will be referred to as such throughout this paper. Many researchers have supported the theory, yet a few, like Martin (1976a) and Kapadia (1974), have criticised it. This paper consists of a review of work related to the topological primacy thesis and a critique of some aspects of it.

Keywords

Young Child Intrinsic Geometry Primacy Thesis Topological Primacy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bass, H.: 1975, ‘Topological understanding of young children’, in M.F.Rosskopf, (ed.), Childrens Mathematical Concepts: 6 Piagetian Studies. Teachers College Press, Columbia, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bryant, P. E., Jones, P., Claxton, V., and Perkins, G. M.: 1972, ‘Recognition of shapes across modalities by infants’, Nature 240, 303–304.Google Scholar
  3. Choquet, G.: 1963, What is Modern Mathematics, Education Explorers, Reading.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, H. G.: 1978, ‘The Scaling of 6 topological groupings, as well as the effect that certain selected variables have on the attainment of these groupings and some of their homologs in the logical domain’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 15, 115–125.Google Scholar
  5. Cousins, D. and Abravanel, E.: 1971, ‘Some findings relevant to the hypothesis that topological features are differentiated prior to Euclidean features during growth’, British Journal of Psychology 62, 475–479.Google Scholar
  6. Cowley, J. J. and Murray, M.: 1962, ‘Some aspects of the development of spatial concepts in Zulu children’, Journal of Social Research 13, 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Dodwell, P. C.: 1968, ‘Children's understanding of spatial concepts’, in I. E.Sigel and F. H.Hooper, (eds.), Logical Thinking in Children, Holst, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 118–1140. (Originally in The Canadian Journal of Psychology (1963) 17, 141–161.)Google Scholar
  8. Dodwell, P. C.: 1971, ‘Children's perception and their understanding of geometrical ideas’, in M. F.Rosskopf, L. P.Steffe and S.Taback, (eds.), Piagetian Cognitive-Development Research and Mathematical Education, National Council of Teachers of Mathemetics, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  9. Eng, H.: 1931, The Psychology of Children's Drawing, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  10. Esty, E. T.: 1970, ‘An investigation of children's concepts of certain aspects of topology’, Ed.D. Thesis, Harvard University (unpublished).Google Scholar
  11. Fischbein, E.: 1963, Conceptele figurale, Editura Academie R.S.R., Bucharest.Google Scholar
  12. Fischbein, E., TiroshD. and HessP.: 1979, ‘The intuition of infinity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 10, 3–40.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, G. H.: 1965, Developmental features of behaviour and perception’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 35, 69–78.Google Scholar
  14. Geeslin, W. E. and SharA. O.: 1979, ‘An alternative model describing children's spatial preferences’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10, 57–68.Google Scholar
  15. Goodnow, J.: 1977, Children's Drawing, Fontana/Open Books, London.Google Scholar
  16. Holmes, R. H.: 1973, ‘An investigation of the status of the understanding of selected topological concepts by mentally handicapped children’, Ph.D. Thesis, Connecticut University (unpublished).Google Scholar
  17. Hoop, N. H.: 1971, ‘Haptic perception’, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 25, 340–344.Google Scholar
  18. Jahoda, G., Deregowkski, V. B., Sinha, D.: 1974, ‘Topological and Euclidean spatial features noted by children: a cross cultural study’, International Journal of Psychology 9, 159–172.Google Scholar
  19. Kapadia, R.: 1974, ‘A critical examination of Plaget and Inhelder's view of topology’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 5, 419–424.Google Scholar
  20. Kellog, R.: 1969, Analyzing Children's Art, National Press Books, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  21. Laurendeau, M. and Pinard, A.: 1970, The Development of the Concept of Space in the Child, International University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Lovell, K.: 1959, ‘A follow-up study of some aspects of the work of Piaget and Inhelder on the child's conception of space’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 29, 104–117.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, J. L.: 1976a, ‘An analysis of some of Piaget's topological tasks from a mathematical point of view’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 7, 8–24.Google Scholar
  24. Martin, J. L.: 1976b, ‘A test with selected topological properties of Piaget's hypothesis concerning the spatial representation of the young child’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 7, 26–38.Google Scholar
  25. Page, E. I.: 1959, ‘Haptic perception: consideration of one of the investigations of Piaget and Inhelder’, Educational Review 11, 115–124.Google Scholar
  26. Page, H. W.: 1973, ‘Concepts of length and distance in a study of Zulu youths’, Journal of Social Psychology 90, 9–16.Google Scholar
  27. Peel, E. A.: 1959, ‘Experimental examination of some of Piaget's schemata concerning children's perception and thinking and a discussion of their educational significance’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 29, 89–103.Google Scholar
  28. Piaget, J.: 1971, Structuralism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  29. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1956, The Child's Conception of Space, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  30. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B: 1971, Mental Imagery in the Child, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  31. Pinard, A. and Laurendeau, M.: 1966, ‘Le caractère topologique des premières representations spatiales de l'enfant’, International Journal of Psychology 1, 243–255.Google Scholar
  32. Richardson, E. M.: 1966, ‘A study of the development of some spatial concepts in blind children’, Ph.D. Thesis, Liverpool University (unpublished).Google Scholar
  33. Rivoire, J. L.: 1962, ‘Development of reference systems in children’, Perceptual and Motor Skills 15, 554.Google Scholar
  34. Sauvy, J. and Sauvy, S.: 1974, The Child's Discovery of Space, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  35. Shar, A. C. and Geeslin, W. E.: 1980, ‘Children's spatial-perceptual preferences — a cross-cultural comparison’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 11, 156–160.Google Scholar
  36. Sime, M.: 1973, A Child's Eye View, Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
  37. Taback, S.: 1975, ‘The child's concept of limit’, in M. F.Rosskopf, (ed.), Children's Mathematical Concepts: 6 Piagetian Studies, Teachers College Press, Columbia, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Vernon, M. D.: 1971, The Psychology of Perception (2nd edn.). Pelican, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  39. Vurpillot, E.: 1972, Le Monde Visuel du Jeune Enfant, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  40. Weinzweig, A. I.: 1978, ‘Mathematical foundations for the development of spatial concepts in children’, in R.Lesh and D.Mierkiewicz, (eds.), Recent Research Concerning the Development of Spatial and Geometric Concepts. ERIC/IAS, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 105–176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Darke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations