Advertisement

Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology

, Volume 244, Issue 4, pp 198–203 | Cite as

Modulation of the masking phenomenon by the crossed part of the medial olivocochlear bundle

  • P. Bonfils
  • J. -L. Puel
  • S. Orès
  • R. Pujol
Article

Summary

The masking phenomenon is used in clinical investigation of the inner ear to determine the frequency selectivity properties of the auditory system. Sectioning of the crossed part of the medial efferent bundle in a guinea pig model decreases the simultaneous masking phenomenon. The efferent effect seen in the forward masking varied with the masking paradigm used. When the masker onset precedes the maskee onset by more than 40 ms, masking diminishes after sectioning the crossed part of the medial efferent bundle. When this duration was shortest (30 ms), no effect was observed. This phenomenon could be explained by the time necessary to stimulate the medial efferent loop. Our results could explain some differences observed in the compound action potential masking curves with different masking paradigms.

Key words

Cochlea Compound action potential tuning curve Simultaneous and forward masking Cochlear efferents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bonfils P, Remond MC, Pujol R (1986) Efferent tracts and cochlear frequency selectivity. Hear Res 24:277–283Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlier E, Pujol R (1982) Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity. Neurosci Lett 28:101–106Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dallos P, Cheatham MA (1976) Compound action potential tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am 59:591–597Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derbyshire AJ, Davis H (1935) The action potentials of the auditory nerve. Am J Physiol 113:476–504Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dewson JH (1968) Efferent olivocochlear bundle: some relationships to noise masking and to stimulus attenuation. J Neurophysiol 30:817–832Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golberg JM, Brown PB (1968) Functional organization of the dog superior olivary complex: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. J Neurophysiol 31:639–656Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guinan JJ, Warr WB, Norris BE (1983) Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral versus medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 221:358–370Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guinan JJ, Warr WB, Norris BE (1984) Topographic organisation of the olivocochlear projections from the lateral and medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 226:21–27Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harris DM (1979) Action potential suppression, tuning curves and thresholds: comparison with single fiber data. Hear Res 1:133–154Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris DM, Dallos P (1979) Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. J Neurophysiol 42:1083–1107Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harrison JM, Irwing R (1964) Nucleus of the trapezoid body: dual afferent innervation. Science 143:473–474Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harrison RV, Aran JM, Erre JP (1981) AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am 69:1374–1385Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irwing R, Harrison JM (1967) The superior olivary complex and audition: a comparative study. J Comp Neurol 130:77–86Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iurato S, Smith C, Eldredge D, Henderson D, Carr C, Ueno Y, Cameron S, Richter R (1978) Distribution of the crossed olivocochlear bundle in the chinchilla's cochlea. J Comp Neurol 182:57–76Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liberman MC, Brown MC (1986) Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 24:17–37Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nieder P, Nieder I (1970) Crossed olivo-cochlear bundle: electrical stimulation enhances neural responses to loud clicks. Brain Res 21:135–137Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Remond MC, Pujol R (1984) CM suppression and CAP masking after sectioning the medial efferent system. In: Catalano GB (ed) Abstracts of the XXI Workshop on Inner Ear Biology. ENT Department, University of Catania, Taormina, Italy, p 21Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robertson D (1985) Brainstem location of efferent neurons projecting to the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 20:79–84Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robertson D, Gummer M (1985) Physiological and morphological characterization of efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 20:63–78Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strutz J, Spatz CL (1980) Superior olivary and extraolivary origin of centrifugal innervation of the cochlea in guinea pig. Neurosci Lett 17:227Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warr WB, Guinan JJ (1978) Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti: two different systems. Brain Res 173:152–155Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Bonfils
    • 1
  • J. -L. Puel
    • 1
  • S. Orès
    • 1
  • R. Pujol
    • 1
  1. 1.Hôpital Saint-CharlesINSERM U-254 and Université de Montpellier IIMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations