International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 114–117 | Cite as

A clinical index (BIDI) based on frequency/volume study in the diagnosis of bladder instability

  • O. Contreras Ortiz
  • A. Pellicari
  • G. Doretti
  • R. J. Lombardo
Original Article

Abstract

A clinical index (BIDI) based on frequency/ volume evaluation was constructed and used in the non-invasive dignosis of bladder instability. Results of the BIDI were compared with the urodynamic diagnoses; 87% of the 89 cases studied were properly classified, with an 82% sensitivity and an 87% specificity. The BIDI is a simple, low-cost and non-invasive method with a low error probability, which can be applied for diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making purposes.

Keywords

Bladder instability Clinical index Frequency/volume study Urinary incontinence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National Institutes of Health. Consensus conference on urinary incontinence in adults. Connecticut Medicine 1989; 53:535–542Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ouslander J, Staskin D, Iraz SI, Hong-Linsu, Hepps K. Clinical vs. urodynamic diagnosis in an incontinent geriatric female population. J Urol 1987; 137:68–71Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wyman JF, Choi SC, Harkins SW, Wilson MS, Fantl J. The urinary diary in evaluation of incontinent women: a test-retest analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:812–817Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diokno AC, Wells TJ, Brink CA. Comparison of self-reported voided volume with cystometric bladder capacity. Neuro Urol Urodynam 1987; 137: 698–700Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Contreras Ortiz O, Paniceres G, Doretti G, Pellicari A, Lombardo R. Diagnóstico de la incontinencia de orina femenina: análisis del estudio frecuencia/volumen. Rev Esp Obstet Ginecol 1989; 48:241–248Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardization of lower urinary tract function recommended by the International Continence Society. Int Urogynecol J 1990; 1:45–58Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arrighi L, Contreras Ortiz O, Pirosanto E. Clínica de incontinencia de orina en la mujer. XXII Congreso Argentino de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Buenos Aires. Sociedad Argentina de Ginecología y Obstetricia, 1967; II:105–106Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morrison, DF. Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1976Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Contreras Ortiz O, Pellicari A, Lombardo RJ. Bladder instability discriminant index (BIDI) in detrusor instability diagnosis (Phase III). XV Annual Meeting of the International Urogynecological Association, Stockholm. Int Urogynecol J 1990; 1:176Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanton S. Clinical gynecologic urology. Saint Louis: Mosby, 1984: 46–58Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    George NJR, Barnard R, Blacklock NJ. Frequency/volume charts revealing physiological abnormalities. Proceedings of the XI Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society, 1981: 67–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shah PJR. The assessment of patients with a view to urodynamics. In: Mundi AR, Stephenson TP, Wein AJ. (eds) Urodynamics. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1984: 53–61Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turner Warwick RT. A reappraisal of the value of routine urological procedures in the assessment of urodynamic function. Symposium on Clinical Urodynamics. Urol Clin North Am 1979; 6:63–70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecology Journal 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Contreras Ortiz
    • 1
  • A. Pellicari
    • 1
  • G. Doretti
    • 1
  • R. J. Lombardo
    • 1
  1. 1.Jose de San Martin School HospitalUniversity of Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations