Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biological effect-test systems for the early recognition of unexpected environmental changes

  • Bioprobes
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pre-marketing assessments of chemicals regarding their potential environmental impacts contain numerous sources of error and uncertainties. Practices and methods for the evaluation of environmental risks posed by individual pre-selected agents seem unsuitable for detecting unexpected trends in the environment. This is particularly so in view of the multitude of anthropogenic assaults on the environment and their complex interactions. Therefore, requirements for symptom-oriented biological effect-test systems, ‘bioprobes’, capable of reacting sensitively to environmental changes of unknown origin were conceived. Bioprobes designed to detect biological effects should respond to a broad spectrum of anthropogenic chemicals. They are environmental quality measuring devices consisting of cultivated organisms, cells, organelles or biomolecules in combination with recording units. In contrast to traditional biotests for chemical testing, bioprobes are deliberately exposed to selected segments of the environment for certain periods of time. During and after such exposures, changes of defined biological states or process rates—‘observation elements’—are registered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt, U., Nobel, W., and Schweizer, B.: 1987, Bioindikatoren; Möglichkeiten, Grenzen und neue Erkenntnisse, Verlag Eugen Ulmer, ISBN 3-8001-3079-3.

  • Deutsche Kommission zur Reinhaltung des Rheins: 1986, Deutscher Bericht zum Sandoz-Unfall mit Messprogramm. Vom: Arbeitsausschuß Meßmethoden der Deutschen Kommission zur Reinhaltung des Rheins; anläßlich der Minister-konferemz der Rheinanliegerstaaten in Rotterdam am 19. Dezember 1986.

  • Field, N.: 1987, Biotechnology R&D—National Policy Issues and Responses, Background paper of the OECD for the Canada-OECD Joint Workshop on National Policies and Priorities in Biotechnology, Toronto, 7th–10th April 1987.

  • Hahn, J.: 1988, ‘Biologische Testverfahren für Kläranlagenzuund-abläufe im Zusammenhang mit den neuen Anforderungen des WHG und AbwAG’, gwf Wasser—Abwasser 129, H.5, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.: 1983, ‘Wirkungsbezogene biologische Testsysteme. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Wasser-, Boden und Lufthygiene’, (BGA) 56, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malz, F. R.: 1987, ‘Chemische physikalische und biologische Analysen zur Abwasseruntersuchung’, Abwassertechnik 1, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peichl, L. and Schmidt-Bleek, F.: 1986, ‘Biosonden zur Früherkennung von Umweltschäden’, Umwelt 4, 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peichl, L., Reiml, D., Ritzl, I., and Schmidt-Bleek, F.: 1987, Übersicht biologischer Wirkungstestsysteme zu Beobachtung unerwarteter Umweltveränderungen—Biosonden—, Teil I, Teil II and ‘Introduction, Summary and Guidance for Reading’. GSF-Bericht 21/87, Ed. Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung mbH, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, D-8042 Neuherberg, ISSN 0721-1694.

  • Schmid, R. D.: 1987, ‘Biosensoren’, Nachr. Chem. Tech. Lab. 35 (9), 910–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek, F.: 1985, Früherkennung von Umwelt-und Gesundheitsschäden, AGF-Tagung: Wege und Wirkungen von Umweltchemikalien. Wissenschaftszentrum, Boon-Bad Godesberg, 12./13. Dezember 1985. Documentation of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Großforschungseinrichtungen (AGF), Ahrstr. 45, D-5300 Bonn-Bad Godesberg, pp. 74–77.

  • Schmidt-Bleek, F., Peichl, L., Behling, G., Müller, K. W., and Reiml, D.: 1987, A Concept for Early Recognition and Assessment of Environmental Changes. Une Demarche pour la Reconnaissance Precoce de Modifications dans 1 Environnement et pour 1 Evaluation de leurs Consequences. GSF-Bericht 21/87, Ed. Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung mbH, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, D-8042 Neuherberg, ISSN 0721-1694.

  • Schmidt-Bleek, F., Peichl, L., Reiml, D., Behling, G., and Müller, K. W. 1988, ‘A Concept for Detecting Unexpected Changes in the Environment early’, Regulatory Toxicol. Pharmacol 8, 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, R. (ed.): 1985, Bioindikation in terrestrischen Ökosystemen, VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, GDR-Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, M.: 1985, ‘Monitoring in Chemical Industry’, in J. Clerinx (ed.), Monitoring in Industry, Proceedings Technologisch Instituut, Antwerpen, pp. 91–98.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dr. Ludwig Peichl, Bayerisches Landesamt für Umweltschutz, Rosenkavalierpl. 3, D-8000, München 81, Germany

    L. Peichl & D. Reiml

Authors
  1. L. Peichl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Reiml
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peichl, L., Reiml, D. Biological effect-test systems for the early recognition of unexpected environmental changes. Environ Monit Assess 15, 1–12 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454744

Keywords

Search

Navigation