Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper examines in some detail the concept of an integrated modeling system. It distinguishes three main types of integration: model integration, solver integration, and integration of various utilities. Model integration is further divided into four subtypes based on a four-level model abstraction hierarchy: specific models, model classes, modeling paradigms, and modeling traditions. The paper then goes on to consider how structured modeling supports the various types of integration. The overall conclusion is that structured modeling offers an attractive approach to the design of integrated modeling systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agin, N.I. (1978), ‘The Conduct of Operations Research Studies’, in J.J. Moder and S.E. Elmaghraby (eds.), Handbook of Operations Research, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balci, O. and Nance, R.E. (1987), ‘Simulation Model Development Environments: A Research Prototype’, J. Operational Research Soc. 38(8), 753–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barstow, D.R., Shrobe, H.E., and Sandewall, E. (Eds.) (1984), Interactive Programming Environments, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., and Navathe, S.B. (1986), ‘A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration’, Computing Surveys 18(4), 323–364 (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beulens, A.J.M. (1986), ‘Transforming Algebraic Data Structures into Relational Data Structures in DSS’, Working Paper, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.

  • Birta, L.G. (1984), ‘Optimization in Simulation Studies’, in T.I. Oren, B.P. Zeigler, and M.S. Elzas (eds.), Simulation and Model-Based Methodologies: An Integrative View, NATO ASI Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanning, R.W. (1985), ‘A Relational Theory of Model Management’, Working Paper 85-106, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, June.

  • Bonczek, R., Holsapple, C., and Whinston, A. (1978), ‘Mathematical Programming Within the Context of a Generalized Database Management System’, R.A.LR.O. 12(2), 117–139 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonczek, R., Holsapple, C., and Whinston, A. (1981), Foundations of Decision Support Systems, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, P. (1985), ‘Forks in the Road to Integration’ and ‘Integrated Packages’, Personal Computing 9(1) 82–95 (January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R.J. and Levesque, H.J. (1985), Readings in Knowledge Representation, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R.J., Fikes, R.E., and Levesque, H.J. (1985), ‘KRYPTON: A Functional Approach to Knowledge Representation’, in Brachman and Levesque (1985).

  • Brodie, M.L. and Mylopoulos, J. (1986), On Knowledge-Based Management Systems: Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Database Management Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, M., Mylopoulos, J., and Schmidt, J. (1984), On Conceptual Modeling, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, W.F. (1982), “MLD: A Language and Data Base for Modeling”, IBM Research Division, San Jose, Research Report RC 9639 (# 42311), September 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari, S. (1988), ‘Knowledge Representation Using Structured Modeling’, Ph.D. Thesis, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.

  • Childs, C. and Meacham, C.R. (1985), “ANALYTICOL—An Analytical Computing Environment’, AT&T Technical J., 64(9), 1995–2007 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, K. and Schrage, L. (1986), ‘Optimization Models with Spreadsheet Programs’, The Institute of Management Sciences, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W.W. and Schramm, R. (1972), ‘A Simultaneous Decision Model for Production, Marketing, and Finance’, Management Science 19(2), 161–172 (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolk, D.R. (1986), ‘A Generalized Model Management System for Mathematical Programming’, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 12(2), 92–125 (June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farn, C.K. (1985), An Integrated Information System Architecture Based on Structured Modeling, Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Management, UCLA.

  • Federgruen, A. and Zipkin, P. (1984), ‘A Combined Vehicle Routing and Inventory Allocation Problem’, Operations Research 32(5), 1019–1037 (September–October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. (1987), ‘Managing the Modeling Process: A Personal Reflection’, European Journal of Operational Research 31(1), 1–8 (July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M. (1977), ‘How Can Specialized Discrete and Convex Optimization Methods Be Married?’, Annals of Discrete Mathematics 1, 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M. (1987), ‘An Introduction to Structured Modeling’, Management Science 33(5), 547–588 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M. (1989), ‘Reusing Structured Models via Model Integration’, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 1989.

  • Glover, F. (1985), ‘Future Paths for Integer Programming and Links to Artificial Intelligence’, CAAI Report 85-8, Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence, University of Colorado, October.

  • Hailpern, B. (1986), ‘Multiparadigm Languages’, IEEE Software 3(1) (January).

  • Hammond, J.S., III (1974), ‘Do's and Don'ts of Computer Models for Planning’, Harvard Business Review 52(2), 110–123 (March–April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, L.-A., Nygard, K., and Shapiro, L. (1986), ‘Data Base Management Systems as Solvers in Model Management Systems’, working paper, CS/OR Department, North Dakota State University, December 12.

  • Hogan, W.W. and Weyant, J.P. (1983), ‘Methods and Algorithms for Energy Model Composition: Optimization in a Network of Process Models’, in B. Lev (ed.), Energy Models and Studies, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokans, R.H. (1984), ‘An Artificial Intelligence Application to Timber Harvest Schedule Implementation’, Interfaces 14(5), 77–84 (September-October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, D., Krishnan, R., and Carl-Mitchell, S. (1984), ‘Interfaces Between Database and Modeling Systems’, Paper 84-12, Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, The University of Texas, Austin, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingman, D., Phillips, N., Steiger, D., Wirth, R., and Young, W. (1986), ‘The Challenges and Success Factors in Implementing an Integrated Products Planning System for Citgo’, Interfaces 16(3), 1–19 (May–June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurière, J.-L. (1978), ‘A Language and a Program for Stating and Solving Combinatorial Problems’, Artificial Intelligence 10(1), 29–127 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, F.R. and Hoffer, J.A. (1985), Data Base Management, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.L. (1981), ‘A Methodology and Software System for Linking Economic Models’, Decision Focus Incorporated, 5 Palo Alto Square, Suite 410, Palo Alto, CA 94304, paper presented at the ORSA-TIMS Joint National Meeting in Houston, October 11–14.

  • Ramamoorthy, C.V., Prakash, A., Tsai, W., and Usuda, Y. (1984), ‘Software Engineering: Problems and Perspectives’, Computer, October, 191–209.

  • Roy, A., Lasdon, L. S., and Lordeman, J. (1986), ‘Extending Planning Languages to Include Optimization Capabilities’, Management Science 32(3), 360–373 (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelman, L. (1986), ‘Firm Chooses 1-2-3 Clone to Consolidate Data’, InfoWorld, November 3, p. 9.

  • Sprague, R.H., Jr. and Carlson, E.D. (1982), Building Effective Decision Support Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohr, E.A. and Tanniru, M.R. (1980), ‘A Database for Operations Research Models’, International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems 4(1), 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsichritzis, D.C. and Lochovsky, F.H. (1982), Data Models, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyant, J.P. (1985), ‘General Economic Equilibrium as a Unifying Concept in Energy-Economic Modeling’, Management Science 31(5), 548–563 (May).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geoffrion, A.M. Integrated Modeling Systems. Computer Science in Economics and Management 2, 3–15 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454701

Key words

Navigation