Skip to main content
Log in

Conclusion

All the issues raised in this paper converge in one major aspect which is at the heart of almost all of the anxieties and the critiques. It is simply that, in modern societies, technology equals power. As Bernstein (1975) observed, the outcomes of the decisions on whom to give access to knowledge, at what level of content and difficulty and for what accreditations substantially determine who holds power in the next generation. As technology teachers we must realise that we have a large part of the most fundamental power of all — the distribution of power in future society.

The responsibility is formidable. This paper has sought to make it more visible and to facilitate its more effective exercise by demonstrating the nature of the process and to advocate its implementation with understanding. In that way teachers may open a broader path to integrity and justice — both professional and political — in both schools and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BernsteinB. B. (1975) Changes in the Coding of Educational Transmissions in Class, Codes and Control, Vol 3, London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily Mail (1992), ‘Technology Teaching Disaster’, 2.6.92

  • Design and Technology Association (1990–92), Design & Technology Teaching (Termly), Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Design and Technology Association (1991–93) Primary Data (Termly), Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books

    Google Scholar 

  • DurkheimE (1979), Essays on Morals and Education (edited by W S FPickering) London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • EgglestonJ (1992) Teaching Design and Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • EgglestonJ (1991) Delivering National Curriculum Technology No 2, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty's Inspectors (HMI) (1992), Technology Key Stages 1. 2 and 3: a report by HMI on the First Year, London: Department of Education and Science

    Google Scholar 

  • National Curriculum Council (1992) Technology for ages 5–16 London: Department for Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Schools Examination and Assessment Council (1991), The Assessment of Performance in Design & Technology, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • SmithersA and RobinsonP (1992) Technology in the National Curriculum: Getting it Right, London: Engineering Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunday Times (1992) ‘Teaching Standards Slide’, 31.5.92

  • ToftP (1989), Managing Change in the CDT Department, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books

    Google Scholar 

  • WarrenG (1992) Delivering National Curriculum Technology No 3, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books

    Google Scholar 

  • WeberM (1962) Basic Concepts in Sociology, London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An edited version of the Maurice Brown Memorial Lecture presented at the National Design and Technology Exhibition 1993

John Eggleston is Professor of Education at the University of Warwick and Chairman of Judges of the Young Electronic Designer Awards

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eggleston, J. The politics of technology education. Int J Technol Des Educ 3, 59–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454397

Keywords

Navigation