Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 430–434 | Cite as

Isolation and characterization of a symbiotic cellulolytic mixed bacterial culture

  • Marya de la Torre
  • Carlos Casas Campillo
Short Communication

Summary

By using batch-culture enrichment techniques a mixed culture of two bacterial spe cies identified as Cellulomonas flavigena and Xanthomonas sp was isolated. The capacity of both bacteria to grow as pure cultures in a min eral medium with alkaline pretreated sugar cane bagasse or cellobiose was tested. C. flavigena as pure culture was able to grow on both substrates only when yeast extract or biotin and thiamine were added to the culture medium, while Xanthomonas sp. could not grow on sugar cane ba gasse, but assimilated cellobiose if yeast extract was supplied. However, both bacteria in mixed culture grew very well on both substrates and did not require any growth factor. It was concluded that the interaction was favourable to both species. The mixed culture had the capacity to degrade a number of different agricul tural wastes and to use them as the sole carbon and energy source for the production mainly of biomass. More than 80% of pineapple bagasse, without chemical pretreatment, was used up by the microbial system.

Keywords

Sugar Cane Thiamine Cellobiose Pure Culture Bagasse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Callihan CD, Cunlap CE (1971) Construction of a chemical-microbial pilot plant for production of single cell protein from cellulosic wastes. Report PB 203620 National Technical Information Service, US Department of CommerceGoogle Scholar
  2. De la Torre M (1981) Producción de proteínas alimenticias de origen unicelular en residuos celulósicos. Ph D Thesis, ENCB Instituto Poli técnico Nacional, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  3. Dye DW (1962) The inadequacy of the usual deter minative test for the identification of Xanthomonas spp. New Zealand J Science 5 (4): 393–416Google Scholar
  4. Enriquez A, Montalvo R, Canales C (1981) Variation of bagasse crystallinity and cellulase activity during the fermentation of Cellulom o nas bacteria Biotechnol Bioeng 23 (7): 1431–1436Google Scholar
  5. Fredrickson AB (1977) Behavior or mixed cultures of microorganism Ann Rev Microbiol 31: 63–87Google Scholar
  6. Han YW (1982) Nutritional requirements and growth of a Cellulomonas species on cellulosic substrates J Ferment Technol 60 (2): 99–104Google Scholar
  7. Han YW, Srinivasan VR (1968) Isolation and characterization of a cellulose utilizing bacterium Appl Microbiol 31: 63–68Google Scholar
  8. Harrison DEF, Wreng SJ (1977) Mixed microbial cultures as a basis for future fermentation processes. Process Biochem 11(8): 30–33Google Scholar
  9. Harrison DEF (1978) Mixed cultures in industrial fermentation processes Adv Appl Microbiol 24:129–164Google Scholar
  10. Kristensen TD (1978) Continuous single cell protein production from Cellulomonas sp. and Candida utilis grown in mixture on barley straw European J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 5: 155–163Google Scholar
  11. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with folin-phenol reagent J Biol Chem 193: 265–275Google Scholar
  12. Mateles LR (1979) Biotechnology in SCP production: is pure culture operation desirable? Procc GIAM-V: 35–319Google Scholar
  13. Molina ED (1980) Producción de proteína unicelu lar usando como fuente de hidratos de carbono medula de bagazo Ph D Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  14. Moo-Young M, Campbell WR (Eds) (1981) Advances in Biotechnology, Vol II, Proceedings of the 6th International Fermentation Symposium. Pergamon Press. CanadaGoogle Scholar
  15. Tseng MMC, Phillips CR (1981) Mixed cultures comensalism and competition with Proteus vu l garis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biotechnol Bioeng 23: 1639–1651Google Scholar
  16. Peitersen N (1975) Cellulase and protein produc tion from mixed cultures of Trichoderma viride and a yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 17: 1291–1299Google Scholar
  17. Perotti de Galvez IN, Molina EO (1981) Influence of the burning of sugar cane bagasse prior to its harvesting upon the production of single cell protein from bagasse pith Biotech not Lett 3 (12): 717–722Google Scholar
  18. Poincelot DP, Day PR (1971) Simple dye release assay for determining cellulolytic activity for fungi. Appl Microbiol 23 (5): 875–879Google Scholar
  19. Rolz C, Humphrey A (1982) Microbial biomass from renewables: review of alternatives Adv Biochem Eng 21: 1–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marya de la Torre
    • 1
  • Carlos Casas Campillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biotechnologie and BioengineeringCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalMéxicoMexico

Personalised recommendations