Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology

, Volume 241, Issue 2, pp 203–208 | Cite as

An ultrastructural analysis of abnormal otic development in exencephalic mutant mice

  • Doris B. Wilson
Article

Summary

Homozygous loop-tail (Lp/Lp) mice exhibit defects in the otocyst as well as extensive neural dysraphism. At 9 days of gestation, cells in the otic pit of abnormal embryos are flattened and lack the rounded luminal contours characteristic of otic cells in their normal littermates. Apical filaments also are not as prominent as in normal embryos, and there is an increase in densely stained globular material in cells at the ventral lip of the otic pit. With glutaraldehyde-tannic acid fixation, the basal lamina of the otic pit cells shows differences from that of the normal otic pit. In abnormal specimens, the lamina densa is irregular and clumped, and the adjacent less dense area is spotty and lacks the more uniformly arranged and delicate fibrils characteristic of the normal basal lamina. These defects may reflect faulty developmental interactions between the dysraphic neural tube, mesenchymal cells, and otic anlage.

Key words

Inner ear Loop-tail mouse Ultrastructure Development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burnside B (1971) Microtubules and microfilaments in newt neurulation. Dev Biol 26: 416–441Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deol MS (1964) The abnormalities of the inner ear in kreisler mice. J Embryol Exp Morphol 12: 475–490Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deol MS (1966) Influence of the neural tube on the differentiation of the inner ear in the mammalian embryo. Nature 209: 219–220Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deol MS (1970) Mouse mutants with inner ear defects and their value in biomedical research. In: Sabourdy M (ed) les mutants pathologique chez l'animal. Cent Natl Recherche Sci, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Handel MA, Roth LE (1971) Cell shape and morphology of the neural tube: implications for microtubule function. Dev Biol 25: 78–95Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27: 137a-138aGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li CW (1979) Congenital malformation of inner ear. Dev Neurosci 2: 7–18Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marovitz WZ, Khan KM, Schulte T (1977) Ultrastructural development of the early rat otocyst. In: Studies in otic embryogenesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl 35] 86: 9–28Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nardi JB (1981) Induction of invagination in insect epithelium: Paradigm for embryonic invagination. Science 214: 564–566Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruben RJ (1973) Development and cell kinetics of the Kreisler (kr/kr) mouse. Laryngoscope 83: 1440–1468Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruben RJ (1980) Pathogenesis of hereditary inner ear abnormalities in animals. Birth Defects 16: 29–34Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van De Water T, Conley E (1982) Neural inductive message to the developing mammalian inner ear: contact mediated versus extracellular matrix interaction. Anat Rec 202: 195aGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van De Water TR, Li CW, Ruben RJ, Shea CA (1980) Ontogenic aspects of mammalian inner ear development. Birth Defects 16: 5–45Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson DB (1983) Early development of the otocyst in an exencephalic mutant of the mouse. Acta Anat (Basel) 117: 217–224Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson DB, Finta LA (1980) Early development of the brain and spinal cord in dysraphic mice: a scanning electron microscopic study. Anat Embryol 160: 315–326Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doris B. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, M-004, School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations