Associative interference: Effects of meprobamate on normal adult's performance on a Müller-Schümann type learning task
- 9 Downloads
Two lists of paired-associate letters were developed. These were administered in two experiments to a “normal” population of adults. In the first experiment, it was expected that the learning of the first list would significantly interfere with the learning of the second list. This proved to be the case. In the second experiment, 400 mg of meprobamate was administered in a doubleblind manner, to one half of a second population. Those Ss receiving the meprobamate evidenced a significant lessening of the interfering effects of the learning of the first list upon the learning of the second list. The experiment supported the hypothesis that meprobamate acts to reduce the strength of the earlier learned associations that interfere with subsequent learning tasks. The implication is that a minimal dose of meprobamate will act to inhibit associative interference in the learning process of normal adults.
The experiment was based on the Müller-Schümann Law of Associative Inhibition and on recent findings concerning the effects of meprobamate on human learning.
KeywordsLearning Process Learning Task Human Learning Minimal Dose Normal Adult
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berger, F. M.: The Pharmacological properties of 2-methyl-2-n-propyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate (Miltown), a new interneuronal blocking agent. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 112, 413–423 (1954).Google Scholar
- —: The similarities and differences between meprobamate and barbituates. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 4, 209–233 (1963).Google Scholar
- Bernstein, E., and D. Dorfman: Some effects of meprobamate on human learning. J. Psychol. 47, 81–86 (1959).Google Scholar
- Brady, J. P., E. E. Levitt, and N. Baydan: An operant-reinforcement paradigm in the study of drug effects. Dis. nerv. Syst. 23, 497–502 (1962).Google Scholar
- Edwards, A. L.: Statistical Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc. 1954.Google Scholar
- Frankenhaeuser, M., and S. Kareby: Effect of meprobamate on catecholamine excretion during mental stress. Percept. Mot. Skills. 15, 571–577 (1962).Google Scholar
- Haagen, C. H.: Synonymity, vividness, familiarity, and association value ratings of 400 pairs of common adjectives. J. Psychol. 27, 453–463 (1949).Google Scholar
- Hendley, C. D., T. E. Lynes, and F. M. Berger: Effect of 2-methyl-2-n-propyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate (Miltown) on central nervous system. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.) 87, 608–612 (1954).Google Scholar
- Kent, G. R., and A. J. Rosanoff: A study of association in insanity. Amer. J. Insan. 67, 37–96, 317–390 (1910).Google Scholar
- Klerman, G. L., M. A. Dimascio, L. L. Havens, and J. E. Snell: Sedation and tranquilization. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 3, 28–37 (1960).Google Scholar
- Krugman, A. D., S. Ross, F. L. Vincini, and D. J. Clyde: A research note: effects of dextro-amphetamine and meprobamate on problem solving and mood of aged subjects. J. Geront. 15, 419–420 (1960).Google Scholar
- Laties, V. G.: Effects of meprobamate on fear and palmer sweating. J. abnorm. soc, Psychol. 59, 156–161 (1969).Google Scholar
- Lienert, G. A., and H. Thorgersen: A method for the administration of psycho- therapeutic drug without the patient's knowledge. Med. exp. (Basel) 2, 77–80 (1960).Google Scholar
- Müller, G. E., u. F. Schümann: Experimentelle Beiträge zur Untersuchung des Gedächtnisses. Z. Psychol. 6, 81–190 (1894).Google Scholar
- Porter, L. A., and C. P. Duncan: Negative transfer in verbal learning. J. exp. Psychol. 46, 61–64 (1953).Google Scholar
- Selling, L. S.: Clinical study of a new tranquilizing drug; use of Miltown (2 methyl- 2-n-propyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate). J. Amer. med. Ass. 157, 1594–1596 (1955).Google Scholar