Advertisement

Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 137–152 | Cite as

Assertion, denial, and the Liar Paradox

  • Terence Parsons
Article

Keywords

Liar Paradox 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnauld, A., La Logique ou L'Art de Penser, 1662.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J., How to Do Things With Words, Oxford University Press, London, 1962.Google Scholar
  3. Donnellan, K., ‘Categories, Negation, and the Liar Paradox’ in R.L. Martin (ed.) The Paradox of the Liar, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. Frege, G., ‘Negation’, in M. Black and P. T. Geach (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell, Oxford, 1960.Google Scholar
  5. Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1952.Google Scholar
  6. Kripke, S., ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy (1975) 690–716.Google Scholar
  7. Martin, R. L., ‘Reply to Hugly and Sayward’, Analysis 39 (1979) 169–174.Google Scholar
  8. Martin, R. L. and Woodruff, P., ‘On Representing ‘True-in-L’, in L’, Philosophia 5 (1975) 213–217.Google Scholar
  9. Routley, R., Meyer, R. K. et al., Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  10. Skyrms, B., ‘International Aspects of Semantical Self-Reference’, in R. L. Martin (ed.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence Parsons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of California at IrvineIrvineU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations