Skip to main content
Log in

Including model uncertainty in estimating variances in multiple capture studies

  • Papers
  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present bootstrap-based methods which incorporate model uncertainty in estimating variances in multiple capture studies. Each of our three methods has a specific set of properties, and we discuss when each method should be used. Our first method can be used in any multiple capture setting, but it gives an estimate of the variance conditional on the number of observed animals. Our other two methods yield estimates of the unconditional variance; they require good estimates of part or all of the specific probability model, respectively. Smoothed estimated cell probabilities are utilized by the latter method. We contrast the three methods on a real-life data set, and then conduct simulations for a simple setting. Finally, we detail the use of our methodology for specific settings and discuss adaptations for tag-return studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P. and White, G.C. (1994) AIC model selection in overdispersed capture-recapture data. Ecology, 75, 1780–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T. (1995) Discussion to: Inference from a deterministic population dynamics model for bowhead whales. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 417–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T. and Garthwaite, P.H. (1991) Quantifying precision of mark- recapture estimates using the bootstrap and related methods. Biometrics, 47, 255–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (1992) Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. In Wildlife 2001: Populations, D.R. McCullough and R.H. Barrett (eds), Elsevier, London, pp 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., and White, G.C. (1994) Evaluation of the Kullback-Leibler discrepancy for model selection in open population capture- recapture models. Biometrical Journal, 36, 229–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A. (1989) Estimating population size for sparse data in capture-recapture experiments. Biometrics, 45, 427–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1982) The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, 38. SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, J.S.U. (1994) Computer Intensive Statistical Methods, Validation Model Selection and Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and Chao, A. (1994) Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture models. Biometrics, 50, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J.L. and Pollock, K.H. (1995) A capture-recapture model with heterogeneity and behavioural response. Journal of Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2, 305–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J.L. and Pollock, K.H. (1996) Nonparametric MLE under two closed capture-recapture models with heterogeneity. Biometrics, 52, 639–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis, D.L., Burnham, K.P., White, G.C. and Anderson, D.R. (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62.

  • Pollock, K.H. (1991) Modeling capture, recapture, and removal statistics for estimation of demographic parameters for fish and wildlife populations: past, present, and future. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 225–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H., Nichols, J.D., Brownie, C., and Hines, J.E. (1990) Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs, 54, 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H. and Otto, M.C. (1983) Robust estimation of population size in closed animal populations from capture-recapture experiments. Biometrics, 39, 1035–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potscher, B.M. (1991) Effects of model selection on inference. Econometric Theory, 7, 163–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regal, R.R. and Hook, E.B. (1991) The effects of model selection on confidence intervals for the size of a closed population. Statistics in Medicine, 10, 717–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W.E. (1958) Handbook of computations for biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Resources Board, Canada, 119.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norris, J.L., Pollock, K.H. Including model uncertainty in estimating variances in multiple capture studies. Environ Ecol Stat 3, 235–244 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453012

Keywords

Navigation