Geriatric Nephrology and Urology

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 105–108 | Cite as

Safety of urologic surgical intervention in the elderly

  • John R. Franklin
  • Carl A. Olsson
  • Ihor S. Sawczuk


Concomitant with the rapidly increasing elderly population in the United States is the development and manifestation of urologic diseases. Besides diagnosing urologic diseases in the geriatric population, the urologic surgeon must be prepared to treat this population. To determine if urologic surgical intervention is safe in this patient population, the records of 59 patients who underwent major urological procedures with anesthesia were reviewed. The mean age was 84.6 years (range 80–101), 55 (92.2%) were males and 4 (6.8%) were females. The patients were divided according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines. In this study 57.6% of the patients had at least one severe, non-incapacitating, systemic disease which constituted an ASA classification of 3 and above. Forty one patients (69.5%) had endoscopic procedures; transurethral resection of the prostate made up the majority of these, 25 (61%). Eighteen patients (30.5%) underwent open procedures; the majority of these (11 of 18) consisted of abdominal and pelvic surgery: radical cystectomy (3), radical nephrectomy (3), suprapubic prostatectomy (3), suprapubic exploration and pelvic lymph node dissection [1], and ileal ureter interposition with bladder cap augmentation (1). The remaining seven patients had scrotal procedures. There were no deaths in either group. Complications occurred in five patients (8.5%); four of these patients had an ASA classification of 3 and above with 2/5 having cerebrovascular accidents. We concluded that age should not be the limiting factor in a decision to perform urologic procedures. Given the advancing age of the American population, surgery, both major endoscopic and open, may be performed in the geriatric population with minimum deaths and complications. Special care and perioperative monitoring should be provided in patients with ASA levels of 3 or greater.

Key words

geriatric morbidity deaths urologic surgery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schneida EL, Guralnik JM. The aging of America: impact on health care costs. JAMA 1990; 263: 2335–40.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rowe JW. Health care of the elderly. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 821–35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24: 111.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fulop T Jr, Worum I, Csongor J, Foris G Leovey A. Composition in elderly people. Gerontology 1985; 31: 6–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daly MP. The medical evaluation of the elderly preoperative patient. Prim Care 1989; 16: 361–76.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seymour DG, Vaz FG. Aspects of surgery in the elderly: preoperative medical assessment. Br J Hosp Med 1987 Feb: 102–12.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barry PP. Primary care evaluation of the elderly for elective surgery. Geriatrics 1987; 42: 77–85.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaiser FE. Principles of geriatric care. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; XVI: 354–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seymour DG, Vaz FG. A prospective study of elderly general surgical patients: post-operative complications. Age Ageing 1989; 18: 316–25.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Homowell LH, Boyle WA. Perioperative care of the hemodynamically unstable geriatric patient. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1988; 26: 156–68.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tasch MD. The autonomic nervous system and geriatric anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1988; 26: 143–51.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Palmberg S, Hirsjarvi E. Mortality in geriatric surgery. Gerontology 1979; 25: 103–12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris M, Lund VJ. Head and neck surgery in the elderly: a mature problem. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103: 306–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berenstein EF, Dilley DB, Randolph HF, III. The improved long term outlook for patients over 70 years of age with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg 1988; 207: 318–22.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kursh ED, Rabin R, Persky L. Is cystectomy a safe procedure in the elderly patients with carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 1977; 118: 40–2.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zincke H. Cystectomy and urinary diversion in patients eighty years or older. Urology 1982; XIX: 139–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John R. Franklin
    • 1
  • Carl A. Olsson
    • 1
  • Ihor S. Sawczuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Urology, College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations