Advertisement

Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 131, Issue 1, pp 32–35 | Cite as

Improved growth conditions for hyphomicrobium sp. B-522 and two additional strains

  • N. Matzen
  • P. Hirsch
Article

Abstract

Growth yields and rates of 3 hyphomicrobia were improved by varying components of or adding compounds to medium 337. Methanol (0.5% v/v), and similarly methylamine·HCl (3.38g/l), were optimal among 22 C-sources tested; increasing the methylamine·HCl concentration to 5.07g/l gave higher Hyphomicrobium B-522 yields but also prolonged lag periods. Ten C-sources (organic acids, alcohols) stimulated growth slightly but significantly, even in subcultures. Sugar compounds were not utilized. Strains B-522 and ZV-580 were stimulated by l-lysine and gluconate, while NQ-521 gr was stimulated by aspartate.

N-Sources tested were inorganic (3), organic (3), or complex (3). (NH4)2SO4 (0.5g/l) was optimal for strains ZV-580 and NQ-521 gr, but Hyphomicrobium B-522 grew best with urea-N. With NH 4 + , strain B-522 grew as homogeneous suspension, all other N-sources caused clumping and pellicle formation. Inorganic requirements (PO 4 3- , Mg, Ca, Fe, Mn, Mo) of strains B-522 and ZV-580 were optimized. Addition of Ni, Co, or Zn had no effect; metals “44” or Cu, resulted in growth inhibition.

Vitamin B12 stimulated Hyphomicrobium B-522; 2.5μg/l B12 decreased the doubling time from 9.3–10.8h to 5.4–5.8h. All combined single improvements resulted in a protein increase of 557% (B-522), 141% (NQ-521 gr), or 109% (ZV-580), respectively.

Key words

Hyphomicrobium Growth requirements Growth improvement Vitamin B12 C-1 utilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthony C (1975) The microbial metabolism of C-1 compounds (The cytochromes of Pseudomonas AM1). Biochem J 146:289–298Google Scholar
  2. Attwood MM, Harder W (1977) Isocitrate lyase activity in Hyphomicrobium spp: A critical reappraisal. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1:25–30Google Scholar
  3. Harder W, Attwood MM (1978) Biology, physiology and biochemistry of hyphomicrobia. Adv Microbial Physiol 17:303–359Google Scholar
  4. Hirsch P (1974) Budding bacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 28:391–444Google Scholar
  5. Hirsch P, Conti SF (1964a) Biology of budding bacteria I. Enrichment, isolation and morphology of Hyphomicrobium spp. Arch Mikrobiol 48:339–357Google Scholar
  6. Hirsch P, Conti SF (1964b) Biology of budding bacteria II. Growth and nutrition of Hyphomicrobium spp. Arch Mikrobiol 48:358–367Google Scholar
  7. Hirsch P, Jones HE (1968) DNA location, hyphal growth and life cycle of a budding bacterium, Hyphomicrobium spec, strain B-522. Bact Proc G 149Google Scholar
  8. Hutner SH (1972) Inorganic nutrition. Ann Rev Microbiol 26:313–343Google Scholar
  9. Kaffka A (1960) Stoffwechselphysiologische Untersuchungen an Hyphomicrobium vulgare Stutzer et Hartleb. Diss Univ HamburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Large PJ, Peel D, Quayle JR (1961) Microbial growth on C-1 compounds. 2. Synthesis of cell constituents by methanol and formategrown Pseudomonas AM1, and methanol- grown Hyphomicrobium vulgare. Biochem J 81:470–480Google Scholar
  11. Lowry OH, rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  12. Mehta RJ (1978) Effect of exogeneous organic compounds on growth of the obligate methylotroph. J Gen Appl Microbiol 24:255–259Google Scholar
  13. Meiberg JBM, Bruinenberg PM, Harder W (1980) Effect of dissolved oxygen tension on the metabolism of methylated amines on Hyphomicrobium X in the absence and presence of nitrate: evidence for “aerobic” denitrification. J Gen Microbiol 120:453–463Google Scholar
  14. Mevius Jr., W (1953) Beitrage zur Kenntnis von Hyphomicrobium vulgare Stutzer et Hartleb. Arch Mikrobiol 19:1–29Google Scholar
  15. Moore RL, Hirsch P (1973) First generation synchrony of isolated Hyphomicrobium swarmer populations. J Bacteriol 116:418–423Google Scholar
  16. Shishkina VN, Trotsenko YuA (1974) Characterization of a new Hyphomicrobium strain utilizing one carbon compounds. Microbiol USSR 43:653–657Google Scholar
  17. Smith AJ, Hoare DS (1977) Specialist phototrophs, lithotrops, and methylotrophs: a unity among a diversity of procaryotes? Bacteriol Rev 41:419–448Google Scholar
  18. Sperl GT, Hoare DS (1971) Denitrification with methanol: a selective enrichment for Hyphomicrobium species. J Bacteriol 108:733–736Google Scholar
  19. Staley JT (1968) Prosthecomicrobium and Ancalomicrobium: new prosthecate freshwater bacteria. J Bacteriol 95:1921–1942Google Scholar
  20. Stutzer A, Hartleb R (1898) Untersuchungen über die bei der Bildung von Salpeter beobachteten Mikroorganismen. (I. Abhandlung) Mitt landw Inst Königl Univ Breslau 1:75–100Google Scholar
  21. Van Ert M, Staley JT (1971) Gas vacuolated strains of Microcyclus aquaticus. J Bacteriol 108:236–240Google Scholar
  22. Wilkinson TG, Hamer G (1972) Some growth characteristics of a Hyphomicrobium sp in batch culture. J Appl Bacteriol 35:577–588Google Scholar
  23. Zavarzin GA (1960) The life cycle and nuclear apparatus in Hyphomicrobium vulgare Stutzer et Hartleb. Microbiol USSR 29:24–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Matzen
    • 1
  • P. Hirsch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Allgemeine MikrobiologieUniversität KielKielFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations