Skip to main content
Log in

Facial rejuvenation: A combined conventional and endoscopic assisted lift

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes our personal approach for facial rejuvenation combining conventional and endoscopic procedures. For a forehead lift we use an endoscopic assisted technique. However, for the face and neck we still prefer the conventional lift. Good candidates for subperiosteal endoscopic midface lifts without skin resection are young or middle-age patients with midface ptosis and pronounced nasolabial/nasoyugal folds, without significant skin excess. Ptosis of the temporo-malar or facial area is also a good indication for subcutaneous endoscopic assisted lift. Aesthetic improvement of the forehead is evaluated with objective data of preoperative and postoperative measurements. We find this minimally invasive technique less traumatic and time consuming. It allows a greater range of possibilities for individual needs because it limits the incision and dissection to the required areas and has a higher level of acceptance by the patients. It is also a good complement to a conventional face lift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramo AC: Anatomy of the forehead muscles: the basis for the videoendoscopic approach in forehead rhytidoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:1170, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aiache AE, Ramirez OH: The suborbicularis oculi fat pads: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:37, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker DC: Lateral Smasectomy: a new, safer approach to rhytidectomy. Presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the American Aesthetic Society. Dallas, TX, 19 April, 1994

  4. Bostwick J, Eaves FF, Nahai F: Endoscopic Plastic Surgery. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. Connell BF, Marten TJ: The male forehead plasty: recognizing and treating aging in the upper face. Clin Plast Surg 18(4):653, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. Core GB, Vasconez LO, Askren C, Yamamoto Y, Gamboa M: Coronal face lift with endoscopic technique. Plast Surg Forum 25:227, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel RK: Endoforehead: subperiosteal approach. Endoscopic Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Symposium, Baltimore, MD, 19–21 August, 1994

  8. De la Fuente A, Santamaría A, Diaz Infante JL: Lifting frontal endoscópico. Cir Plast Ibero-Latinoamer XXI(3): 267, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  9. De la Plaza R, Valiente E, Arroyo JM: Supraperiosteal lifting of the upper two-thirds of the face. Br J Plast Surg 44(5):325, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman JJ: Corset platysmaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 19(2): 369, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinderer U, Urriolagoitia F, Vildosola R: The blepharoperiorbitoplasty: anatomical basis. Ann Plast Surg 18:437, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isse NG: Endoscopic facial rejuvenation: endoforehead. The funtional lift. Case reports. Aesth Plast Surg 18:141, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ivy EJ, Lorene ZP, Aston SJ: Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing conventional SMAS, extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Aesthetic Society. Dallas, TX, 19 April, 1994

  14. Ramirez OM: Endoscopic techniques in facial rejuvenation: an overview. Part 1. Aesth Plast Surg 18:141, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramirez OM: The spastic frontalis syndrome: a description of a new entity. Presented at Endoscopic Aesthetic Surgery Symposium. Baltimore, MD, 19–21 August, 1994.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de la Fuente, A., Santamarfa, A.B. Facial rejuvenation: A combined conventional and endoscopic assisted lift. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 20, 471–479 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449249

Key words

Navigation