Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tibial tubercle elevation with bone grafts

A comparative study of autograft and allograft

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We retrospectively investigated the fate of bone auto- and allografts in 64 patients who underwent a tibial tubercle elevation with bone graft. Half of them received an autograft and the other half, an allograft that had been processed and freeze-dried. The two groups had similar preoperative characteristics concerning age, sex and pathology. Roentgenograms were reviewed by three independent observers and scored for fusion, resorption and collapse. Clinical charts were analysed for different variables. The overall radiological score for both groups did not differ statistically. Comparison of graft fixation with one or two screws demonstrated more bone resorption in the case of a single-screw fixation. In such a case, the occurrence of a preoperative tubercle fracture had a significant adverse influence, due to a less stable fixation. From the clinical charts review, only the mean stay at hospital was significantly shorter when an allograft was performed. A bone allograft appears to be suitable to maintain an osteotomy but requires a more careful surgical technique fixation to obtain a similar result to an autograft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott LC, Schottstaedt ER, Saunders JB, Bost FC (1947) The evaluation of cortical and cancellous bone as grafting material. J Bone Joint Surg 29:281

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson WJ (1989) Allograft bone for arthodesis and repair of skeletal hand problem. J Hand Surg Br 14:332–335

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aspenberg P, Thor/'en K (1990) Lipid extraction enhances bank bone incorporation. Acta Orthop Sand 61:546–548

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown MD, Malinin TI, Davis PB (1976) A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusion. Clin Orthop 119:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delloye C, Allington N, Munting E, Vincent A (1987) L'os de banque lyophilise. Technique et résultats après 3 années d'utilisation. Acta Orthop Belg 53:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delloye C, de Halleux J, Cornu O, Wegmann E, Buccafusca GC, Gigi J (19919 Organizational and investigational aspects of bone banking in Belgium. Acta Orthop Belg 57:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Palma A, Rothman R, Lewinneck G et al (1972) Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 134:755–758

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dodd CA, Fergusson CM, Freedman L, Houghton GR, Thomas D (1988) Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:431–434

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emerson RH Jr, Head WC, Becklarich FM, Malinin TT (1989) Non cemented acetabular revison arthroplasty using allograft bone. Clin Orthop 249:30–43

    Google Scholar 

  10. Enneking WF, Burchardt H, Puhl JJ, Piotrowski G (1975) Physical and biological aspects of repair in dog cortical bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:237–252

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fabry G (1991) Allograft versus autograft bone in idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a multivariate statistical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 11:465–468

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fergusson AB Jr (1982) Elevation of the insertion of the patellar ligament for patellofemoral pain. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:766–711

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friedlaender GE (1987) Current concepts review bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:786–790

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grossman W, Peppelman WC, Baum JA, Kraus DR (1992) The use of freeze dried fibular allograft in anterior cervical fusion. Spine 17:565–569

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kienapfel H, Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Galante JO (1992) Efficacy of autograft and freeze-dried allograft to enhance fixation of porous coated implants in the presence of interface gaps. J Orthop Res 10:423–433

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malinin TI, Brown MD (1981) Bone allografts in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 154:68–73

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maquet P (1976) Advancement of the tibial tuberosity. Clin Orthop 115:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mellonig JT, Prewett AB, Moyer MP (1992) HIV inactivation in a bone allograft. J Periodontol 63:979–983

    Google Scholar 

  19. Montgomery DM, Aranson DD, Lee CL, Lamont RL (1990) Posterior spinal fusion: allograft versus autograft bone. J Spinal Disord 3:370–375

    Google Scholar 

  20. Recht J, Bayard F, Delloye C, Vincent A (1993) Freeze-dried allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 2:235–238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cornu, O.H., de Halleux, J., Banse, X. et al. Tibial tubercle elevation with bone grafts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114, 324–329 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00448955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00448955

Keywords

Navigation