Psychological Research

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 80–87 | Cite as

Comparisons of memory for nonverbal auditory and visual sequential stimuli

  • Dennis J. McFarland
  • Anthony T. Cacace
Original Article
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

Properties of auditory and visual sensory memory were compared by examining subjects' recognition performance of randomly generated binary auditory sequential frequency patterns and binary visual sequential color patterns within a forced-choice paradigm. Experiment 1 demonstrated serial-position effects in auditory and visual modalities consisting of both primacy and recency effects. Experiment 2 found that retention of auditory and visual information was remarkably similar when assessed across a 10 s interval. Experiments 3 and 4, taken together, showed that the recency effect in sensory memory is affected more by the type of response required (recognition vs. reproduction) than by the sensory modality employed. These studies suggest that auditory and visual sensory memory stores for nonverbal stimuli share similar properties with respect to serial-position effects and persistence over time.

Keywords

Visual Information Sensory Modality Recognition Performance Recency Effect Frequency Pattern 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1968). How does acoustic similarity influence short-term memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 249–264.Google Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 225, 556–559.Google Scholar
  3. Cacace, A. T., & McFarland, D. J. (1992). Acoustic pattern recognition and short-term memory in normal adults and young children. Audiology 31, 334–341.Google Scholar
  4. Cacace, A. T., McFarland, D. J., Emrich, J. F., & Haller, J. S. (1992). Assessing short-term recognition memory with forced-choice psychophysical methods. Journal of Neuroscience methods, 44, 145–155.Google Scholar
  5. Capitani, E., Della Sala, S., Logic, R. H., & Spinnler, H. (1992). Recency, primacy, and memory: Reappraising and standardizing the serial position curve. Cortex, 28, 315–342.Google Scholar
  6. Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1968). Input modality and the serial position curve in short-term memory. Psychonomic Science, 10, 135–136.Google Scholar
  7. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.Google Scholar
  8. Crowder, R. G. (1986). Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 268–278.Google Scholar
  9. Crowder, R. G., & Morton, J. (1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS) Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 365–373.Google Scholar
  10. Dempster, F. N. (1981). Memory span: Sources of individual and development differences. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 63–100.Google Scholar
  11. Deutsch, D. (1975). The organization of short-term memory for a single acoustic attribute. In D. Deutsch & J. A. Deutsch (Eds.), Short-term memory, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Gardiner, J. M. (1983). On recency and echoic memory, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 302, 29–42.Google Scholar
  13. Garner, W. R., & Gottwald, R. L. (1968). The perception and learning of temporal patterns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 97–109.Google Scholar
  14. Glenberg, A. M., & Jona, M. (1991). Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects. Memory Cognition, 19, 514–522.Google Scholar
  15. Glenberg, A. M., Mann, S., Altman, L., Forman, T., & Precise, S., (1989). Modality effects in the coding and reproduction of rhythms. Memory & Cognition, 17, 373–383.Google Scholar
  16. Glenberg, A. M., & Swanson, N. C. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 740–748.Google Scholar
  17. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1990). Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2662–2674.Google Scholar
  18. Green, D. M. (1974). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Greene, R. L., & Crowder, R. G. (1988). Memory for serial position: effects of spacing, vocalization, and stimulus suffixes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 740–748.Google Scholar
  20. Greene, R. L., & Samuel, A. G. (1986). Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Performance, 12, 517–524.Google Scholar
  21. Guilford, J. P., & Dallenbach, K. M. (1925). The determination of memory span by the method of constant stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 36, 621–628.Google Scholar
  22. Jahnke, J. C., Davis, S. T., & Bower, R. E. (1989). Position and order information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 859–867.Google Scholar
  23. Leshowitz, B., & Hanzi, R. (1974). Serial position effects for tonal stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 2, 112–116.Google Scholar
  24. Levitt, H. (1971) Transformed up-down method in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical society of America, 49, 467–477.Google Scholar
  25. Lockhart, R. S., & Murdock, B. B. (1970). Memory and the theory of signal detection. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 100–109.Google Scholar
  26. Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M. W., Asplund, R., & Dyrnes, S. (1990). Perfect visual short-term memory for periodic patterns. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 345–362.Google Scholar
  27. McFarland, D. J., & Cacace, A. T. (1992). Aspects of short-term acoustic recognition memory: Modality and serial position effects. Audiology, 31, 342–352.Google Scholar
  28. McFarland, D. J., Cacace, A. T., & Emrich, J. (1991). Disassociation of auditory and visual short-term memory systems following temporal lobe damage. The Third IBRO World Congress of Neuroscience, Montreal Canada, 1991.Google Scholar
  29. Morton, J., & Chambers, S. M. (1976). Some evidence for “speech” as an acoustic feature. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 31–45.Google Scholar
  30. Morton, J., & Holloway, C. M. (1970). Absence of a cross-modality “suffix effect” of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 167–176.Google Scholar
  31. Murdock, B. B. (1966). Visual and auditory stores in short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 206–211.Google Scholar
  32. Naatanen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–288.Google Scholar
  33. Parkinson, S. R. (1972). Short-term memory while shadowing: Multiple-item recall of visually and of aurally presented letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 256–265.Google Scholar
  34. Parks, T. E. (1966). Signal detectability theory of recognition memory performance. Psychological Review, 73, 44–58.Google Scholar
  35. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398–422.Google Scholar
  36. Philips, W. A., & Cristie, D. F. M. (1977). Components of visual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 117–133.Google Scholar
  37. Pollack, I. (1972). Memory for auditory waveforms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52, 1209–1215.Google Scholar
  38. Roberts, L. A. (1986). Modality and suffix effects in memory for melodic and harmonic musical materials. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 123–157.Google Scholar
  39. Shallice, T., & Vallar, G. (1990). The impairment of auditory-verbal short-term storage. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice (Eds.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 11–53) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shand, M. A., & Klima, E. S. (1981). Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American sign language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 464–474.Google Scholar
  41. Sperling, G. (1963). A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 21, 19–31.Google Scholar
  42. Spoehr, K. T., & Corin, W. J. (1978). The stimulus suffix effect as a memory coding phenomena. Memory & Cognition, 6, 583–589.Google Scholar
  43. Tattersall, A. J., & Broadbent, D. E. (1991). Output buffer storage and the modality of recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 1–18.Google Scholar
  44. Van Rooij, J. C. G. M., Plomp, R., & Orlebeke, J. F. (1989). Auditory and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I: Development of test battery. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1294–1309.Google Scholar
  45. Watkins, M. J. (1977). The intricacy of memory span. Memory & Cognition, 5, 529–534.Google Scholar
  46. Watson, C. S. (1987). Uncertainty, information masking, and the capacity of immediate auditory memory. In W. A. Yost & C. S. Watson (Eds.), Auditory processing of complex sounds (pp. 267–277). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis J. McFarland
    • 1
  • Anthony T. Cacace
    • 2
  1. 1.Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and ResearchNew York State Department of HealthAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Surgery and NeurologyAlbany Medical CollegeAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations