Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 63–69 | Cite as

On the nature and meaning of sinuosity in magnitude-estimation functions

  • Robert Teghtsoonian
  • Martha Teghtsoonian
  • John C. Baird
Original Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Magnitude-estimation functions for single observers, derived from multiple judgments of closely spaced stimuli, exhibit a sinuous form in logarithmic coordinates, an observation frequently confirmed since first reported by Luce and Mo (1965). We propose that this can result from reliance on a restricted pool of responses, called “preferred numbers” by Baird and Noma (1975). We describe a model featuring a response band centered on an assumed power function, from which the observer selects from among preferred numbers with equal probability. In simulations, the expected values of these selections oscillate around the underlying power function with an appearance similar to that of Luce-Mo functions. The appearance of these functions depends on values assumed for the scale factor of the power function, the range of intensities considered, and the width of the band from which responses are drawn. We conclude that sinuosity in magnitude-estimation functions does not disconfirm the psychophysical power law.

Keywords

Power Function Noma Equal Probability Single Observer Prefer Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baird, J. C. (1975a). Psychophysical study of numbers IV. Generalized preferred state theory. Psychological Research, 38, 175–187.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, J. C. (1975b). Psychophysical study of numbers V. Preferred state theory of matching functions. Psychological Research, 38, 189–207.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, J. C., Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 277–289.Google Scholar
  4. Baird, J. C., Lewis, C., & Romer, D. (1970). Relative frequencies of numerical responses in ratio estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 358–362.Google Scholar
  5. Baird, J. C., & Noma, E. (1975). Psychophysical study of numbers: I. Generation of numerical responses. Psychological Research, 37, 281–297.Google Scholar
  6. Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. (1974). Variability of magnitude estimates: A timing theory analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 291–300.Google Scholar
  7. Luce, R. D., & Mo, S. (1965). Magnitude estimation of heaviness and loudness by individual subjects. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 159–174.Google Scholar
  8. Marks, L. E., & Stevens, J. C. (1966). Individual brightness functions. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 17–24.Google Scholar
  9. Noma, E., & Baird, J. C. (1975). Psychophysical study of numbers II. Theoretical models of number generation. Psychological Research, 38, 81–95.Google Scholar
  10. Poulton, E. C. (1968). The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 1–19.Google Scholar
  11. Ross, B. M., & Engen, T. (1959). Effects of round number preferences in a guessing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 462–468.Google Scholar
  12. Stevens, S. S. (1953). On the brightness of lights and the loudness of sounds. Science, 118, 576 (abstract).Google Scholar
  13. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Teghtsoonian, M., & Teghtsoonian, R. (1983). Consistency of individual exponents in cross-modal matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 203–214.Google Scholar
  15. Teghtsoonian, R., & Teghtsoonian, M. (1978). Range and regression effects in magnitude scaling. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 305–314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Teghtsoonian
    • 1
  • Martha Teghtsoonian
    • 1
  • John C. Baird
    • 2
  1. 1.Clark Science CenterSmith CollegeNorthamptonUSA
  2. 2.Dartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations