Current Genetics

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 393–397 | Cite as

Trehalose: Its role in germination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Anita D. Panek
  • Edilson J. Bernardes
Original Articles

Summary

Mutants with specific lesions were used to differentiate between the functions of glycogen and trehalose in S. cerevisiae. Diploids which harbor the glc1/glc1 mutation depend upon the phosphorylated, less active form of glycogen synthase and show a more active, phosphorylated form, of the enzyme trehalase. These conditions are due to a lesion in the regulating subunit of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Such cells are unable to sporulate. Diploids which contain the sst1/sst1 mutation have normal glycogen metabolism but their trehalose-6-phosphate synthase is not active. Such strains sporulate but germination is poor and only one-spore tetrads are formed. These results confirm that glycogen is needed to trigger sporulation while trehalose plays a role in the germination process. Different systems, I and II, of trehalose accumulation were proposed. System I would require the UDPG-linked trehalose synthase, whereas system II would constitute an alternative pathway, specifically induced or activated by the expression of a MAL gene. The presence of system II in its constitutive form in the constructed diploids would favour trehalose synthesis during growth on glucose, however, it did not overcome the glycogen deficiency during sporulation nor the lack of trehalose for germination. It seems that only system I, namely trehalose 6-P-synthase, plays a role in the germination process.

Key words

Trehalose Glycogen Sporulation Germination Saccharomyces cerevisiae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cabib E, Leloir LIT (1958) J Biol Chem 231:259–275Google Scholar
  2. Chester, VE (1967) Nature 214:1237–1238Google Scholar
  3. Clancy MJ, Smith LM, Magee PT (1982) Mol Cel Biol 2:171–178Google Scholar
  4. Colonna WJ, Magee PT (1978) J Bacteriol 134:844–853Google Scholar
  5. Hawthorne DC, Mortimer RK (1960) Genetics 45:1085–1110Google Scholar
  6. Inoue H, Shimoda C (1981) Mol Gen Genet 183:32–36Google Scholar
  7. Kane SM, Roth R (1974) J Bacteriol 118:8–14Google Scholar
  8. Keller F, Schellenberg M, Wiemken A (1982) Arch Microbiol 131:298–301Google Scholar
  9. Lillie SH, Pringle JR (1980) J Bacteriol 143:1384–1394Google Scholar
  10. Oliveira DE, Rodrigues EGC, Mattoon JR, Panek AD (1981) Curr Genet 3:235–242Google Scholar
  11. Operti MS, Oliveira DE, Freitas-Valle AB, Oestreicher EG, Mattoon JR, Panek AD (1982) Curr Genet 5:69–76Google Scholar
  12. Ortiz CH, Maia JCC, Tenan MN, Braz-Padrao GR, Mattoon JR, Panek AD (1983) J Bacteriol 153:644–651Google Scholar
  13. Padrão GRB, Malamud DR, Panek AD, Mattoon JR (1982) Mol Gen Genet 185:255–261Google Scholar
  14. Panek AD (1963) Arch Biochem Biophys 100:422–425Google Scholar
  15. Panek AD (1975) Eur J Appl Microbiol 2:39–46Google Scholar
  16. Panek AD, Sampaio AL, Braz GRC, Mattoon JR (1978) In: Bicila M, Horecker BL, Stoppani AOM (eds) Biochemistry and Genetics of Yeasts. Pure and Applied Aspects. Academic Press, NY, pp 145–160Google Scholar
  17. Pringle JR, Friedman M, Fiechter A (1974) Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Yeasts: Part I p 37Google Scholar
  18. Roth R (1970) J Bacteriol 101:53–57Google Scholar
  19. Rothman-Denes LB, Cabib E (1970) Proc Nat] Acad Sci 66:967–974Google Scholar
  20. Sherman F (1963) Genet 48:375–385Google Scholar
  21. Thevelein JM, Hollander JA, Den Shulman RG (1982) Proc Nail Acad Sci USA 79:3503–3507Google Scholar
  22. Van de Poll KW, Schamhart DHJ (1977) Mol Gen Genet 154:61–66Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita D. Panek
    • 1
  • Edilson J. Bernardes
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de QuímicaUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de Janeiro, RJBrasil

Personalised recommendations