Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 71–74 | Cite as

Otoplasty: Shaping the antihelix

  • Peter E. Johnson
Article

Abstract

In completing a satisfactory repair of the prominent ear, the shape of the antihelical fold is often the key to the aesthetic outcome. Correction involves not just creating a fold in the antihelix but also establishing a smooth sweep or antihelical curve anterior to posterior as well. The essential components described include accurate scoring of the antihelical fold followed by placement of mattress fixation sutures, with emphasis on obliquely placed sutures to control the final curve and shape of the antihelix. Sutures placed obliquely can solve the problem of persistent upper-pole prominence as in a telephone deformity, or overfolding which can stigmatize otoplasty.

Key words

Otoplasty Prominent ear 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamson PA, McShane DP, Feldman RI: Otoplasty: an update. J Otolaryngol 16:258, 1987Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker OJ: Surgical correction of the abnormally protruding ear. Arch Otolaryngol 50:541, 1949Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Converse JM, Nigro A, Wilson FA, Johnson N: A technique for surgical correction of the lop ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 15:411, 1955Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis JE, Hernandez HH: History of the aesthetic surgery of the ear. Aesth Plast Surg 2:75, 1978Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elliot RA: Otoplasty: a combined approach. Clin Plast Surg 17:373, 1990Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ely ET: An operation for prominent auricles (reprint). Plast Reconstr Surg 42:582, 1968Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erich JB: Surgical treatment of protruding ears. Eye Ear Nose Throat Monthly 37:390, 1958Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Furnas DW: Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastiod sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:189, 1968Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Furnas DW: External ear. In: Jurkiewicz MJ, Krizek TJ, Mathes SJ, Ariyan S (eds): Plastic Surgery Principles and Practice. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1990Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hinderer UT, deRio JL, Fregenal FJ: Otoplasty for prominent ears. Aesth Plast Surg 11:63, 1987Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luckett WH: A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 10:635, 1910Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahler D: The correction of the prominent ear. Aesth Plast Surg 10:29, 1986Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDowell AJ: Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 41:17, 1986Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mustardé JC: The correction of prominent ears by using simple mattress sutures. Br J Past Surg 16:170, 1963Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mustardé JC: The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 39:383, 1967Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pierce GW, Klabunde EH, Bergeron VL: Useful procedures in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2:358, 1947Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stenstrom SJ: Cosmetic deformities of the ears. In: Grabb WC, Smith JW (eds): Plastic Surgery. Boston: Little Brown, 1968Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stenstrom SJ: The stentrom otoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 5:465, 1978Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tanzer RC: The correction of prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 30:236, 1972Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanzer RC: Deformities of the auricle. In: Converse JM (ed): Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1977Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vecchione TR: Needle scoring of the anterior surface of the cartilage in otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 64:568, 1979Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter E. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Pembroke PinesUSA

Personalised recommendations