Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been few comparisons between different schedules of reinforcement for establishing drugs as discriminative stimuli. Fixed-ratio (FR) 10 and tandem variable-interval 1-min FR-10 schedules have been compared directly in a conventional, nicotine-saline discrimination paradigm with food reinforcement in rats. The discrimination was acquired rapidly under both schedules, with stimulus control by nicotine (0.1 mg/kg SC) being very slightly superior under the FR schedule. In 5-min extinction tests with nicotine, rats maintained under the FR schedule yielded a clear dose-response curve with a bar-selection (quantal) index; in these rats, discrimination of nicotine appeared generally poor, and dose-response curves were shallow, when the percentage of drug-appropriate responding (quantitative index) was calculated. In contrast, rats under the tandem schedule yielded clear dose-response data with both indices. In tests with (+)-amphetamine full generalization was obtained with both schedules, and with both quantitative and quantal indices. Tests of generalization to morphine were negative regardless of the training schedule or index employed. In rats under the FR-10 schedule, overall response rates declined both within and across extinction tests; the relatively high rates of responding maintained by the tandem schedule were more sensitive to the response rate-decreasing effects of morphine and amphetamine. The results confirm that orderly data may be obtained with either a FR or a tandem schedule provided that an appropriate index of discriminative response is employed. The results generally support the validity of current practices, and there will probably be no marked differences between conclusions depending on which schedule is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boja JW, Schechter MD (1987) Behavioral effects of N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxy-amphetamine (MDE; “EVE”). Pharmacol Biochem Behav 28:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance WT, Murfin D, Krynock GM, Rosecrans JA (1977) A description of the nicotine stimulus and tests of its generalization to amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 55:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1977) Drug-produced cues and states: some theoretical and methodological inferences. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976) Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia 46:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1977) Differential haloperidol effect on two indices of fentanyl-saline discrimination. Psychopharmacology 53:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews PB, Wenger GR (1977) Rate-dependency of the behavioral effects of amphetamine. In: Thompson T, Dews PB (eds) Advances in behavioral pharmacology, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 167–227

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Mello GD (1981) A comparison of some behavioural effects of amphetamine and electrical brain stimulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system in rats. Psychopharmacology 75:184–192

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Mello GD, Stolerman IP (1978) Methodological issues in drug-discrimination research. In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcha HS, Rose IC, Stolerman IP (1985) Midazolam cue in rats: generalization tests with anxiolytic and other drugs. Psychopharmacology 87:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcha HS, Goldberg SR, Reavill C, Risner ME, Stolerman IP (1986) Behavioural effects of the optical isomers of nicotine and nornicotine, and of cotinine, in rats. Br J Pharmacol 88:298P

  • Goudie AJ (1977) Discriminative stimulus properties of fenfluramine in an operant task: an analysis of its cue function. Psychopharmacology 53:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris CM, Emmett-Oglesby MW, Mathis DA, Lal H (1988) Quantal detection and homogenous sensitivity in a pentylenetetrazol discrimination. Psychopharmacology 94:183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho BT, Huang J-T (1975) Role of dopamine in d-amphetamine-induced discriminative responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:1085–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempf GL, Kallman MJ (1987) A comparison of testing procedures on the discriminative morphine stimulus. Psychopharmacology 91:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Koek W, Slangen JL (1982) The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization. Psychopharmacology 76:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn DM, Appel JB, Greenberg I (1974) An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia 39:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EB, Jepsen SA (1985) Antagonism of the amphetamine cue by both classical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 111:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1979) Influence of shaping procedures and schedules of reinforcement on performance in the two-bar drug discrimination task: a methodological report. Psychopharmacology 65:291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JA, Stolerman IP, Garcha HS, Giardini V, Feyerabend C (1983) Discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine: further evidence for mediation at a cholinergic receptor. Psychopharmacology 81:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Reavill C, Stolerman IP (1988) Interaction of nicotine with dopaminergic mechanisms assessed through drug discrimination and rotational behaviour in rats. J Psychopharmacol 1:264–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP, D'Mello GD (1981) Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology 73:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP, Garcha HS, Pratt JA, Kumar R (1984) Role of training dose in discrimination of nicotine and related compounds by rats. Psychopharmacology 84:413–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter JC (1978) Drug-induced stimulus control. In: Blackman DE, Sanger DJ (eds) Contemporary research in behavioral pharmacology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 209–237

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolerman, I.P. Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 97, 131–138 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443427

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443427

Key words

Navigation