Polar Biology

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 95–103 | Cite as

Environmental factors influencing decomposition rates in two Antarctic moss communities

  • R. C. Davis
Article

Summary

Rates of disappearance of dead material of Polytrichum alpestre and Chorisodontium aciphyllum from a moss turf community and of Drepanocladus uncinatus, Calliergon sarmentosum and Cephaloziella varians from a moss carpet community, measured using litter bags over 2 years, were 1.5% year-1. Decomposition potential, estimated using loss in tensile strength of cotton strips inserted into the different bryophytes on the two sites, was also low. Ranking the five plant species in order of decomposition potential, from highest to lowest, gave D. uncinatus, C. aciphyllum, C. sarmentosum, P. alpestre and C. varians. The time taken for the tensile strength of the cotton strips at depths of 1–3 and 4–6 cm beneath the surface to decline by 50% varied from 1–2 years under the first two species to 3–4 years beneath the last two species. The main causes of these slow rates were low temperatures, short active season and low pH. Differences in decomposition between species, sites and with depth were related to temperature, nutrient status, water content and anaerobic conditions. Variation in anaerobic conditions beneath D. uncinatus, C. sarmentosum and C. varians in the moss carpet resulted in wide variation of decomposition rate beneath these species and with depth beneath C. varians. The peat in the moss turf was aerobic and experienced higher temperatures, but the average decomposition rate was no higher than in the moss carpet, because the peat was of a poorer quality and had a lower pH.

Keywords

Tensile Strength Decomposition Rate Active Season Dead Material Experienced High Temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker JH (1972) The rate of production and decomposition of Chorisodontium aciphyllum (Hook, fet Wils.) Broth. Br Antarct Surv Bull 27:123–129Google Scholar
  3. Collins NJ (1975) Studies on the productivity of Antarctic bryophytes. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins NJ, Baker JH, Tilbrook PJ (1975) Signy Island, maritime Antarctic. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull, vol 20. Swedish Natural Research Council, Stockholm, pp 345–374Google Scholar
  5. Coulson JC, Butterfield J (1978) An investigation of the biotic factors determining the rates of plant decomposition on blanket bog. J Ecol 66:631–650Google Scholar
  6. Davis RC (1980) Peat respiration and decomposition in Antarctic terrestrial moss communities. Biol J Linn Soc 14:39–49Google Scholar
  7. Davis RC (1981) Structure and function of two Antarctic terrestrial moss communities. Ecol Monogr 51:125–143Google Scholar
  8. Fenton JHC (1978) The growth of Antarctic moss peat banks. PhD Thesis, University of London, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenton JHC (1980) The rate of peat accumulation in Antarctic moss banks. J Ecol 68:211–228Google Scholar
  10. Heal OW, Howson G, French D, Jeffers JNR (1974) Decomposition of cotton strips in tundra. In: Holding AJ, Heal OW, MacLean SF, Flanagan PW (eds) Soil organisms and decomposition in tundra. Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Stockholm, pp 341–362Google Scholar
  11. Heal OW, Latter PM, Howson G (1978) A study of the rates of decomposition of organic matter. In: Heal OW, Perkins DF (eds) Production ecology of British moors and montane grasslands. Ecological studies, vol 27. Springer, Berlin pp 135–159Google Scholar
  12. Latter PM, Howson G (1977) The use of cotton strips to indicate cellulose decomposition in the field. Pedobiologia 17:145–155Google Scholar
  13. Limbert DWS, Farman JC (1976) Anual summary tables of surface meteorological observations at British Antarctic Survey Stations. Br Antarct Surv Bull 44:27–29Google Scholar
  14. Limbert DWS, Loan RSB (1976a) Climatological summary for 1971. Br Antarct Surv Bull 44:31–37Google Scholar
  15. Limbert DWS, Loan RSB (1976b) Climatological summary for 1972. Br Antarct Surv Bull 44:39–45Google Scholar
  16. Limbert DWS (1977) Climatological summary for 1974. Br Antarct Surv Bull 45:139–145Google Scholar
  17. Limbert DWS (1979) Climatological summary for 1975. Br Antarct Surv Bull 47:129–135Google Scholar
  18. Longton RE (1972) Growth and reproduction in northern and southern hemisphere populations of the peat-forming moss Polytrichum alpestre with reference to the estimation of productivity. Proc 4th Int Peat Congr I, International Peat Society, Helsinki, pp 259–275Google Scholar
  19. Phillipson J (1964) A miniature bomb calorimeter for small biological samples. Oikos 15:130–139Google Scholar
  20. Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosysems. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Tilbrook PJ (1973) The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites. 1. An introduction. Br Antarct Surv Bull 33/34:65–76Google Scholar
  22. Walton DWH, Allsopp D (1977) A new test cloth for soil burial trials and other studies on cellulose cecomposition. Int Biodeterior Bull 13:112–115Google Scholar
  23. Woods PV, Raison RJ (1982) An appraisal of techniques for the study of litter decomposition in eucalypt forests. Aust J Ecol 7:215–225Google Scholar
  24. Wynn-Williams DD (1980) Seasonal fluctuations in microbial activity in Antarctic moss peat. Biol J Linn Soc 14:11–28Google Scholar
  25. Wynn-Williams DD (1984) Comparative microbiology of moss-peat decomposition on the Scotia Arc and Antarctic Peninsula. In: Siegfried WR, Condy PR, Laws RM (eds) Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs. Springer, Berlin, pp 204–210Google Scholar
  26. Wynn-Williams DD (1985a) The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites. 16. Peat O2-uptake in a moss turf relative to edaphic and microbial factors. Br Antarct Surv Bull 68:47–59Google Scholar
  27. Wynn-Williams DD (1985b) The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites. 17. Peat O2-uptake in a moss carpet relative to edaphic and microbial factors. Br Antarct Surv Bull 68:61–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. C. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations