Summary
Schistidium antarctici is the commonest of five bryophytes known in the Windmill Islands area of Wilkes Land, Greater Antarctica. In moist habitats it forms closed carpets, but in dry sites it develops a short cushion growth form. Carbon dioxide exchange of both a mesic (Sm) and a xeric growth form (Sx) was investigated by means of an IRGA system in the field near Casey Station under natural light and simulated ambient or controlled temperature conditions in the plant chamber. The chlorophyll content in Sm was three times higher than in Sx. The light compensation point of Sm was lower than in Sx. The data for photosynthesis and dark respiration were computed by means of non-linear and linear regression analysis. Sm was more productive and had a wider temperature range of positive net photosynthesis than Sx under similar conditions. Dark respiration per gram of the whole moss sample was identical in both ecodemes. A decline of the photosynthesis curves at quantum flux densities above 500 μmol m-2 s-1 PAR indicated a photoinhibitory effect in Sm. Sx was even more sensitive to high irradiance levels. Photoinhibition was not apparent in laboratory measurements under artificial light. According to our field measurements the photoinhibitory effect increases with increasing temperature. Moisture loss was avoided during the experiments by water supply from the bottom and frequently spraying the moss samples with water. In the natural habitat the desiccating effect of solar radiation is important, as it quickly causes photosynthesis to cease. The moss will dry out sooner in a xeric habitat than in one which is continuously moist. Consequently, the mesic Schistidium might particularly be subjected to photoinhibition by bright sunshine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamson H, Wilson M, Selkirk P, Seppelt R (1989) Photoinhibition in Antaretic mosses. Polarforschung (in press)
Björkman O (1980) The response of photosynthesis to temperature. In: Grace J, Ford ED, Jarvis PG (eds) Plants and their atmospheric environment. 21st Symp Br Ecol Soc Edinburgh, March 1979. Black well, Oxford, pp 273–301
Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New Ser, vol 12A, Physiological plant ecology I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 57–107
Caldwell MM (1981) Plant response to solar ultraviolet radiation. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New Ser, vol 12A, Physiological plant ecology I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 170–197
Curtis OF, Clark DG (1950) An introduction to plant physiology. McGraw-Hill, New York
Davis RC, Harrisson PM (1981) Prediction of photosynthesis in maritime Antaretic mosses. CNFRA 51:241–247
Edwards JA, Smith RIL (1988) Photosynthesis and respiration of Colobanthus quitensis and Deschampsia antarctica from the maritime Antarctic. Bull Br Antarct Surv 81:43–63
Gilmour JSL, Greger JW (1939) Demes: a suggested new terminology. Nature 144:333–334
Goldman CR, Mason DT, Wood BJB (1963) Light injury and inhibition in Antarctic freshwater phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 8:313–322
Greene DM (1986) A conspectus of the mosses of Antarctica, South Georgia, the Falkland Islands and southern South America. Cambridge, British Antarctic Survery, 314 pp
Ino Y (1983) Photosynthesis and primary production in a moss community at Syowa station, Antarctica. Jpn J Ecol 33:427–433
Jacobsen P, Kappen L (1989) A note of the performance of Rinodina olivaceobrnnnea in the continental Antarctic. Lichenologist (in press)
Jarvis PG, Catsky J (1971) Gas exchange systems. In: Sestak Z, Catsky J, Jarvis PG (eds) Plant photosynthetic production. Manual of methods. Junk, The Hague, pp 50–56
Kallio P, Saarnio E (1986) The effect on mosses of transplantation to different latitudes. J Bryol 14:159–178
Kappen L, Bölter M, Kühn A (1986) Field measurements of net photosynthesis of lichens in the Antarctic. Polar Biol 5:255–258
Mache R, Loiseaux S (1973) Light saturation of growth and photosynthesis of the shade plar Marchantia polymorpha. J Cell Sci 12:391–401
Oechel W, Sveinbjörnsson B (1978) Primary production prooesses in Antarctic bryophytes at Barrow, Alaska. In: Tiezen L (ed) Vegetation and production ecology of an Alaskan Arctic tundra. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 269–298
Rastorfer JR, Higginbotham N (1968) Rates of photosynthesis and respiration of the moss Bryum sandbergii as influenced by light intensity and temperature. Am J Bot 55:1225–1229
Rastorfer JR (1970) Effects of light intensity and temperature on photosynthesis and respiration of two east Antarctic mosses, Bryum argenteum and Bryum antarcticum. Bryologist 73:544–556
Rastorfer JR (1972) Comparative physiology of four west Antarctic mosses. Antarct Res Ser 20, Antarctic terrestrial biology. In: Llano GA (ed) American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 143–161
Smith RIL (1984) Terrestrial plant biology of the Sub-Antarctic and Antarctic. In: Laws RM (ed) Antarctic ecology, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 61–162
Smith RIL (1988) Recording oryophyte microclimate in remote and severe environments. In: Glime JM (ed) Methods in bryology. Nichinan, Hattori Botanical Laboratory, pp 275–284
Smith RIL (1989) Aspects of cryptogam water relations at a continental Antarctic site. Polarforschung (in press)
Turesson G (1925) The plant species in relation to habitat and climate. Contributions to the knowledge of genecological units. Hereditas 6:147–236
Valanne N (1984) Photosynthesis and photosynthetic products in mosses. In: Dyer AF, Duckett JG (eds) The experimental biology of bryophytes. Academic Press, London, pp 257–273
Ziegler H, Egle K (1965) Zur quantitativen Analyse der Chloroplastenpigmente. Beitr Biol Pflanzen 41:11–63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Cordially dedicated to Professor Dr. O.H. Volk, Würzburg, on the event of his 85th birthday
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kappen, L., Lewis Smith, R.I. & Meyer, M. Carbon dioxide exchange of two ecodemes of Schistidium antarctici in Continental Antarctica. Polar Biol 9, 415–422 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443227
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443227


