Skip to main content
Log in

Dose-dependent and baseline-dependent conditioning with d-amphetamine in the place conditioning paradigm

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The place conditioning paradigm was used to evaluate the positively reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine. During conditioning, female rats were injected (IP) with saline or one of five doses (0.625–5 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine (d-A) and confined to the initially non-preferred side of the testing apparatus. The highest dose of d-A failed to produce a significant preference. The four middle doses of the drug induced a similar preference. A significant increase from baseline was observed on the 4th post-conditioning test day in the five drug groups and controls when given an injection of 1.5 mg/kg d-A 15 min prior to placement in the chamber. Control and drug groups were separated into high and low initial preference sub-groups. Place preferences were more readily induced by d-A in the sub-groups with initially high baseline preferences. These findings as well as those of others led us to conclude that the place conditioning paradigm is a somewhat problematic way of measuring drug reinforcement and that the effects observed may not solely be the result of the conditioning of the drug's reinforcing properties to a particular environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardo MT, Miller JS, Neiswander JL (1984) Conditioned place preference with morphine: the effect of extinction training on the reinforcing CR. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker JB Robinson TE, Lorenz KA (1982) Sex differences and estrous cycle variations in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior. Eur J Pharmacol 80:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello NL, Carlson JN, Glick SD (1986) Amphetamine induced conditioned place aversion in female Long-Evans rats. Soc Neurosci Abstr 12:920

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit H, Stewart J (1981) Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology 75:134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Scala G, Martin Iverson MT, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1985) The effects of progabide (SL 76002) on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference induced by d-amphetamine. Eur J Pharmacol 108:271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick SD, Hinds PA, Carlson JN (1987) Food deprivation and stimulant self-administration in rats: differences between cocaine and d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 91:372–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruszewska A, Romandini S, Samanin R (1986) Different effects of zimelidine on the reinforcing properties of d-amphetamine and morphine on conditioned place preference in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 125:283–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone P, Di Chiara G (1987) Blockade of D-1 receptors by SCH 23390 antagonizes morphine- and amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Eur J Pharmacol 135:251–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson MT, Ortmann R, Fibiger HC (1985) Place preference conditioning with methylphenidate and nomifensine. Brain Res 332:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1984) Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination. Psychopharmacology 82:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichner MA, Holman EW (1977) Location preference and flavor aversion reinforced by amphetamine in rats Anim Learn Behav 5:343–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoles MT, Siegel S (1986) A potential role of saline trials in morphine-induced place-preference conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:1169–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982) Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Brain Res 253:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyraki C, Kazandjian A, Varonos D (1985) Diazepam-induced place preference conditioning: appetitive and antiaversive properties. Psychopharmacology 87:225–232

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costello, N.L., Carlson, J.N., Glick, S.D. et al. Dose-dependent and baseline-dependent conditioning with d-amphetamine in the place conditioning paradigm. Psychopharmacology 99, 244–247 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00442816

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00442816

Key words

Navigation