Abstract
The place conditioning paradigm was used to evaluate the positively reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine. During conditioning, female rats were injected (IP) with saline or one of five doses (0.625–5 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine (d-A) and confined to the initially non-preferred side of the testing apparatus. The highest dose of d-A failed to produce a significant preference. The four middle doses of the drug induced a similar preference. A significant increase from baseline was observed on the 4th post-conditioning test day in the five drug groups and controls when given an injection of 1.5 mg/kg d-A 15 min prior to placement in the chamber. Control and drug groups were separated into high and low initial preference sub-groups. Place preferences were more readily induced by d-A in the sub-groups with initially high baseline preferences. These findings as well as those of others led us to conclude that the place conditioning paradigm is a somewhat problematic way of measuring drug reinforcement and that the effects observed may not solely be the result of the conditioning of the drug's reinforcing properties to a particular environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardo MT, Miller JS, Neiswander JL (1984) Conditioned place preference with morphine: the effect of extinction training on the reinforcing CR. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:545–549
Becker JB Robinson TE, Lorenz KA (1982) Sex differences and estrous cycle variations in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior. Eur J Pharmacol 80:65–72
Costello NL, Carlson JN, Glick SD (1986) Amphetamine induced conditioned place aversion in female Long-Evans rats. Soc Neurosci Abstr 12:920
de Wit H, Stewart J (1981) Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology 75:134–143
Di Scala G, Martin Iverson MT, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1985) The effects of progabide (SL 76002) on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference induced by d-amphetamine. Eur J Pharmacol 108:271–274
Glick SD, Hinds PA, Carlson JN (1987) Food deprivation and stimulant self-administration in rats: differences between cocaine and d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 91:372–374
Kruszewska A, Romandini S, Samanin R (1986) Different effects of zimelidine on the reinforcing properties of d-amphetamine and morphine on conditioned place preference in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 125:283–286
Leone P, Di Chiara G (1987) Blockade of D-1 receptors by SCH 23390 antagonizes morphine- and amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Eur J Pharmacol 135:251–254
Martin-Iverson MT, Ortmann R, Fibiger HC (1985) Place preference conditioning with methylphenidate and nomifensine. Brain Res 332:59–67
Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1984) Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination. Psychopharmacology 82:241–247
Reichner MA, Holman EW (1977) Location preference and flavor aversion reinforced by amphetamine in rats Anim Learn Behav 5:343–346
Scoles MT, Siegel S (1986) A potential role of saline trials in morphine-induced place-preference conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:1169–1173
Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1982) Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Brain Res 253:185–193
Spyraki C, Kazandjian A, Varonos D (1985) Diazepam-induced place preference conditioning: appetitive and antiaversive properties. Psychopharmacology 87:225–232
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costello, N.L., Carlson, J.N., Glick, S.D. et al. Dose-dependent and baseline-dependent conditioning with d-amphetamine in the place conditioning paradigm. Psychopharmacology 99, 244–247 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00442816
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00442816