Skip to main content
Log in

Differential generalization to pentobarbital in rats trained to discriminate lorazepam, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, or triazolam

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In drug discrimination studies benzodiazepinetrained animals have typically responded on the drug lever when tested with barbiturates. In a recent study, greater specificity appeared to be shown when lorazepam was used as a training drug. The generality and limits of this finding were explored in the present set of experiments. The asymmetrical cross-generalization found in lorazepam-and pentobarbital-trained baboons was replicated in rats and was shown not to be a function of either lorazepam (0.1., 0.32, or 1.0 mg/kg) or pentobarbital (10 or 25 mg/kg) training dose (i.e., pentobarbital-trained rats responded on the drug lever in tests with lorazepam, but lorazepam-trained rats did not show comparable pentobarbital generalization). In the next experiment, groups of rats were trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (10 mg/kg), triazolam (0.1 mg/kg), or diazepam (1.0 mg/kg). Generalization to both lorazepam and pentobarbital was shown by these rats. Finally after daily pentobarbital administration, lorazepam-trained rats made a sufficient number of responses after high pentobarbital doses to permit extension of the range of pentobarbital doses tested. Pentobarbital generalization increased, but still did not occur in all rats and was unreliable in successive tests in the same rats. These results suggest less homogeneity in the discriminative stimulus effects of “depressant drugs” than generally has been recognized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ator NA (1989) Drug stimulus discrimination and drug stimulus generalization with anxiolytics. Drug Dev Res (in press)

  • Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1983) Lorazepam and pentobarbital drug discrimination in baboons: Cross-drug generalization tests and interaction with Ro 15-1788. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 226:776–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1985a) Asymmetrical cross-generalization in lorazepam (LOR)-and pentobarbital (PB)-trained rats. Fed Proc 44:495

    Google Scholar 

  • Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1985b) Lorazepam and pentobarbital discrimination: Interactions with CGS 8216 and caffeine. Eur J Pharmacol 107:169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1986) Discriminative stimulus effects of atypical anxiolytics in baboons and rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 237:393–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1989) Asymmetrical cross-generalization with lorazepam and pentobarbital training conditions. Drug Dev Res (in press)

  • Barry H III (1974) Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed Proc 33:1814–1824

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry H III, Krimmer EC (1972) Pentobarbital effects perceived by rats as resembling several other depressants but not alcohol. Proc 80th Annu Conv Am Psychol Assoc 7:849

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry H, Krimmer EC (1979) Differential stimulus attributes of chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital. Neuropharmacology 18:991–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DA (1985) The non-sedating anxiolytic CGS 9896 produces discriminative stimuli that may be related to an anxioselective effect. Life Sci 37:703–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Desmedt LKC, Janssen PAJ (1976) Discriminative stimulus properties of benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and pharmacologically related drugs: Relation to some intrinsic and anticonvulsant effects. Eur J Pharmacol 37:113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1977) Differential haloperidol effect on two indices of fentanyl-saline discrimination. Psychopharmacology 53:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1980) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 212:474–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissaris RL, Rech RH (1983) Tolerance and cross-tolerance to central nervous system depressants after chronic pentobarbital or chronic methaqualone administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:327–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzer R, Perio A (1982) Behavioural evidence for partial agonist properties of Ro 15-1788, a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol 81:655–658

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vry, Slangen JL (1986a) Effects of chlordiazepoxide training dose on the mixed agonist-antagonist properties of benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788 in a drug discrimination procedure. Psychopharmacology 88:177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vry J, Slangen JL (1986b) Effects of training dose on discrimination and cross-generalization of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol in the rat. Psychopharmacology 88:341–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans SM, Johanson CE (1989) The discriminative stimulus properties of midazolam in the pigeon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 248:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Extance K, Goudie AJ (1981) Inter-animal olfactory cues in operant drug discrimination procedures in rats. Psychopharmacology 73:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcha HS, Rose IC, Stolerman IP (1985) Midazolam cue in rats: generalization tests with anxiolytic and other drugs. Psychopharmacology 87:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza R de la, Evans S, Johanson CE (1987) Discriminative stimulus properties of oxazepam in the pigeon. Life Sci 40:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt DJ (1981) Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxazepam and lorazepam. Clin Pharmacokinet 6:89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt DJ, Divoll M, Abernethy DR, Ochs HR, Shader RI (1983) Benzodiazepine kinetics: implications for therapeutics and pharmacogeriatrics. Drug Metab Rev 14:251–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug T (1983) Neuropharmacological specificity of the diazepam stimulus complex: effects of agonists and antagonists Eur J Pharmacol 93:221–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug T, Gotestam KG (1982) The diazepam stimulus complex: specificity in a rat model. Eur J Pharmacol 80:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Herling S, Shannon HE (1982) Ro 15-1788 antagonizes the discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats but not similar effects of pentobarbital. Life Sci 31:2105–2112

    Google Scholar 

  • Herling S, Valentino RJ, Winger G (1980) Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons. Psychopharmacology 71:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarbe TUC (1976) Characteristics of pentobarbital discrimination in the gerbil: transfer and antagonism. Psychopharmacology 49:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarbe TUC, Holmgren B (1977) Discriminative properties of pentobarbital after repeated noncontingent exposure in gerbils. Psychopharmacology 53:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarbe TUC, McMillan DE (1983) Interaction of the discriminative stimulus properties of diazepam and ethanol in pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzman NJ, Herling S, Shannon HE (1983) Discriminative properties of pentobarbital (PB): comparisons with benzodiazepines (BZ) and other sedative-hypnotics in rats. Fed Proc 42:344

    Google Scholar 

  • Le AD, Khanna JM, Kalant H, Grossi F (1986), Tolerance to and cross-tolerance among ethanol, pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan DE, Leander JD (1978) Chronic chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital interactions on punished and unpunished behavior. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 207:515–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto M (1984) Barbiturate tolerance and physical dependence: contribution of pharmacological factors. In: Sharp CW (ed) Mechanisms of tolerance and dependence. NIDA Res Monogr 54, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1966) State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10:6–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1974) Experimental methods for the study of statedependent learning. Fed Proc 33:1800–1813

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1976) Discriminable effects of benzodiazepines. Psychopharmacol Commun 2:339–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1977) Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital using drug vs. drug discrimination training. Psychopharmacology 53:195–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1984) State-dependent learning and drug discriminations. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of Psychopharmacology, vol 18. Plenum Press, New York, pp 59–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA, Hayes NW (1984) Optimal training parameters in the two-bar fixed-ratio drug discrimination task. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch RJ, Stolerman IP (1987) Midazolam cue in rats: effects of drugs acting on GABA and 5-hydroxytryptamine systems, anticonvulsants and sedatives. J Psychopharmacol 2:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger DJ, Joly D, Zivkovic B (1985) Behavioral effects of nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic drugs: a comparison of CGS 9896 and zopiclone with chlordiazepoxide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 232:831–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Sannerud CA, Young AM (1987) Environmental modification of tolerance to morphine discriminative stimulus properties in rats. Psychopharmacology 93:59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon HE, Herling S (1983) Discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats: evidence for a maximal effect. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 227:160–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon HE, Holtzman SG (1979) Morphine training dose: a determinant of stimulus generalization to narcotic antagonists in the rat. Psychopharmacology 61:231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Spealman RD (1985) Discriminative-stimulus effects of midazolam in squirrel monkeys: comparison with other drugs and antagonism by Ro 15-1788. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235:456–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP, D'Mello GD (1981) Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology 73:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP, Garcha HS, Pratt JA, Kumar R (1984) Role of training dose in discrimination of nicotine and related compounds by rats. Psychopharmacology 84:413–419

    Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Appel JB (1982) Training dose as a factor in LSD-saline discrimination. Psychopharmacology 76:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Winger G, Herling S (1982) Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in rhesus monkeys: tests of stimulus generalization and duration of action. Psychopharmacology 76:172–176

    Google Scholar 

  • York JL (1978) A comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, barbital, and phenobarbital in rats. Psychopharmacology 60:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • York JL, Winter JC (1975) Assessment of tolerance to barbital by means of drug discrimination procedures. Psychopharmacologia 42:283–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Young R, Glennon RA, Dewey WL (1983) Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital and diazepam. Fed Proc 42:1124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ator, N.A., Griffiths, R.R. Differential generalization to pentobarbital in rats trained to discriminate lorazepam, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, or triazolam. Psychopharmacology 98, 20–30 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00442001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00442001

Key words

Navigation