Psychopharmacology

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 54–60 | Cite as

Discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine: Further evidence for mediation at a cholinergic receptor

  • J. A. Pratt
  • I. P. Stolerman
  • H. S. Garcha
  • V. Giardini
  • C. Feyerabend
Original Investigations

Abstract

Rats were trained to discriminate nicotine (0.4 mg/kg SC) from saline in a standard two-bar operant conditioning procedure with food reinforcement. The response to nicotine was dose-related and at the ED50 of 0.14 mg/kg, plasma nicotine concentrations were similar to those reported previously for cigarette smokers who inhale. The nicotine analogues anabasine and cytisine increased nicotine-appropriate responding in a dose-related manner. Animals predominantly responded on the saline-associated lever when administered drugs from a range of pharmacological classes, even at doses that were sufficiently large to reduce the overall numbers of responses. The results confirm that the nicotine discriminative stimulus is highly specific. Previous work has shown anabasine and cytisine to be active at nicotinic-cholinergic binding sites in rat brain. The finding that there is some correlation between the behavioural effects of these compounds and their actions at the nicotine binding site may indicate that the nicotine cue is mediated throuth a cholinergic receptor.

Key words

Nicotine Drug discrimination Cytisine Anabasine Nicotinic receptors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abood LG, Lowy K, Tometsko A, Booth H (1978) Electrophysiological, behavioural, and chemical evidence for a non-cholinergic stereospecific site for nicotine in rat brain. J Neurosci Res 3:327–333Google Scholar
  2. Barlow RB, McLeod LJ (1969) Some studies on cytisine and its methylated derivatives. Br J Pharmacol 35:161–174Google Scholar
  3. Barry H III (1974) Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats. Fed Proc 33:1814–1824Google Scholar
  4. Chance WT, Murfin D, Krynock GM, Rosecrans JA (1977) A description of the nicotine stimulus and tests of its generalization to amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 55:19–26Google Scholar
  5. Colpaert FC (1977) Drug-produced cues and states: Some theoretical and methodological inferences. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum, New York, pp 5–21Google Scholar
  6. D'Mello GD, Stolerman IP (1977) Comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and amphetamine in rats. Br J Pharmacol 61:415–422Google Scholar
  7. Feyerabend C, Russell MA (1980) Assay of nicotine in biological materials: sources of contamination and their elimination. J Pharm Pharmacol 32:178–181Google Scholar
  8. Garcha HS, Giardini V, Pratt JA, Stolerman IP (1983) Anabasine and cytisine: nicotine-like behavioural effecs in a drug-discrimination procedure. Br J Pharmacol 79:272PGoogle Scholar
  9. Garcha HS, Kumar R, Pratt JA, Stolerman IP (1982) Characteristics of the nicotine cue in rats. Br J Pharmacol 76:227PGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert DG (1979) Paradoxical tranquilizing and emotion-reducing effects of nicotine. Psychol Bull 86:643–661Google Scholar
  11. Giorguieff MF, Le Floc'h ML, Glowinski J, Besson MJ (1977) Involvement of cholinergic presynaptic receptors of nicotinic and muscarinic types in the control of the spontaneous release of dopamine from striatal dopaminergic terminals in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 200:535–544Google Scholar
  12. Guidotti A, Toffano G, Costa E (1978) An endogenous protein modulates the affinity of GABA and benzodiazepine receptors in rat brain. Nature 275:553–555Google Scholar
  13. Haefely W (1974) The effects of various “nicotine-like” agents in the cat superior cervical ganglion in situ. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 281:93–117Google Scholar
  14. Haefely W, Kulcsar A, Möhler H, Pieri L, Polc P, Schaffner R (1975) Possible involvement of GABA in the central actions of benzodiazepines. In: Costa E, Greengard P (eds) Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, vol 14. Raven Press, New York, pp 131–151Google Scholar
  15. Hirschhorn ID, Rosecrans JA (1974) Studies on the time course and the effect of cholinergic and adrenergic receptor blockers on the stimulus effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 40:109–120Google Scholar
  16. Ho BT, Huang J-T (1975) Role of dopamine in d-amphetamine-induced discriminative responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:1085–1092Google Scholar
  17. Meltzer LT, Rosecrans JA (1981) Discriminative stimulus properties of arecoline: A new approach for studying central muscarinic receptors. Psychopharmacology 75:383–387Google Scholar
  18. Morrison CF, Stephenson JA (1969) Nicotine injections as the conditioned stimulus in discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia 15:351–360Google Scholar
  19. Pieri L, Schaffner R, Scherschlicht R, Polc P, Sepinwall J, Davidson A, Möhler H, Cumin R, Da Prada M, Burkard WP, Keller HH, Müller RK, Gerold M, Pieri M, Cook L, Haefely W (1981) Pharmacology of midazolam. Drug Res 31:2180–2201Google Scholar
  20. Romano C (1981) Nicotine action on rat colon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 217:828–833Google Scholar
  21. Romano C, Goldstein A (1980) Stereospecific nicotine receptors on rat brain membranes. Science 210:647–650Google Scholar
  22. Romano C, Goldstein A, Jewell NP (1981) Characterization of the receptor mediating the nicotine discriminative stimulus. Psychopharmacology 74:310–315Google Scholar
  23. Rosecrans JA, Chance WT (1977) Cholinergic and non-cholinergic aspects of the discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine. In: Lal H (ed) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. Plenum, New York, pp 155–185Google Scholar
  24. Rosecrans JA, Kallman MJ, Glennon R (1978) The nicotine cue: an overview. In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs: Ten years of progress. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 69–81Google Scholar
  25. Russell MAH, Jarvis M, Iyer R, Feyerabend C (1980) Relation of nicotine yield of cigarettes to blood nicotine concentrations in smokers. Br Med J 280:972–976Google Scholar
  26. Schechter MD, Rosecrans JA (1972) Nicotine as a discriminative cue in rats: Inability of related drugs to produce a nicotine-like cueing effect. Psychopharmacologia 27:379–387Google Scholar
  27. Schwab LS, Kritzer MF (1982) The effect of cholinergic antagonists on a central response to nicotine. Experientia 38:119–120Google Scholar
  28. Sershen H, Reith MEA, Lajtha A, Gennaro J (1981) Non-cholinergic, saturable binding of (±)-[3H]nicotine to mouse brain. Journal of Receptor Research 2:1–15Google Scholar
  29. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. Iowa University Press, IowaGoogle Scholar
  30. Stolerman IP, D'Mello GD (1981) Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology 73:295–303Google Scholar
  31. Stolerman IP, Pratt JA, Garcha HS (1982) Further analysis of the nicotine cue in rats. In: Drug discrimination: applications in CNS pharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 203–210Google Scholar
  32. Turner DM (1975) Influence of route of administration on metabolism of [14C] nicotine in four species. Xenobiotica 5:553–561Google Scholar
  33. White FJ, Appel JB, Kuhn DM (1979) Discriminative stimulus properties of quipazine: direct serotonergic mediation. Neuropharmacology 18:143–151Google Scholar
  34. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamamoto I, Inoki R, Iwatsubo K (1968) Penetration of nicotine-14C into several rat tissues in vivo and in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 12:560–567Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Pratt
    • 1
  • I. P. Stolerman
    • 1
  • H. S. Garcha
    • 1
  • V. Giardini
    • 1
  • C. Feyerabend
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Pharmacology and PsychiatryInstitute of PsychiatryLondonUK
  2. 2.Poisons UnitNew Cross HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations