Abstract
Selective genotyping of extreme progeny is a powerful method to increase the information content per individual when looking for quantitative trait loci (QTLs) using molecular markers for which a map is known. However, if marker information from the selected individuals is used to construct the map of the markers, this can lead to distorted segregation of the markers that in turn can lead to the estimation of a spurious linkage between independently inherited markers. The mistaken estimation of linkage between independently inherited markers will occur when there are two (or more) independently inherited QTLs linked to two (or more) markers and the same individuals are used to estimate the map of the markers and to do the QTL estimation. The incorrect linkage occurs because in selecting individuals from the tails of the phenotypic distribution we will also be selecting certain combinations of the markers instead of obtaining a random sample of the true distribution of the marker genotypes. Analytical results are outlined and the analyses of a simulated data set illustrate the problems that could arise when data from individuals chosen by selective genotyping are incorrectly employed to construct a marker map. A strategy is proposed to remedy this problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Darvasi A, Soller M: Selective genotyping for determination of linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus. Theor Appl Genet 85: 353–359 (1992).
Darvasi A, Soller M: Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic mapping. Genetics 141: 1199–1207 (1995).
Falconer D S: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Essex, UK (1989).
Haley C S, Knott S A: A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69: 315–324 (1992).
Jansen R C: A general mixture model for mapping quantitative trait loci by using molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 85: 252–260 (1992).
Kearsey M J, Hyne V: QTL analysis: a simple ‘marker-regression’ approach. Theor Appl Genet 89: 698–702 (1994).
Lander E S, Botstein D: Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121: 185–199 (1989).
Lander E S, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly M J, Lincoln SE: MAPMAKER: an iterative computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174–181 (1987).
Lebowitz RJ, Soller M, Beckmann JS: Trait-based analyses for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in crosses between inbreed lines. Theor Appl Genet 73: 556–562 (1987).
Lincoln SE, Daly M J, Lander E S: Constructing Genetic Linkage Maps with MAPMAKER. A Tutorial and Reference Manual. Whitehead Institute for Biochemical Research (1990).
Martínez O, Curnow R N: Estimating the locations and the sizes of the effects of quantitative trait loci using flanking markers. Theor Appl Genet 85: 480–488 (1992).
Martínez O, Curnow R N: Missing markers when estimating quantitative trait loci using regression mapping. Heredity 73: 198–206 (1994).
SAS Institute Inc. SAS Language: Reference, Version 6. 1st ed. SAS Institute, Carry, NC, p. 589 (1990).
Stam P: Construction of integrated genetic linkage maps by means of a new computer package: JOINTMAP. Plant J 3: 739–744 (1993).
Zeng Z B: Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136: 1457–1468 (1994).
Zeng Z B: Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 10972–10976 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martínez, O. Spurious linkage between markers in QTL mapping. Mol Breeding 2, 351–358 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437913
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437913