Rheologica Acta

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 175–184 | Cite as

On the behavior of fine mud suspensions

  • P. Coussot
  • J. M. Piau
Original Contributions

Abstract

Flows of natural mud-water mixtures are of great interest for industrial and civil engineering. But there is still no general agreement about the methods for determining the main rheological characteristics of these systems. We propose here an accurate rheological study of some natural mud-water mixtures. We first discuss the possible effects of changing various parameters such as temperature, pH, electrolyte concentration, solid concentration, clay type. The behavior of these muds appears to be very sensitive to most of these parameters and to be hardly predictable from a knowledge of their components. Then, we show that a Herschel-Bulkley model fits very well steady flow experimental data for a very large range of shear rates. We also suggest physical explanations of this model in agreement with our observations of behavior changes when some parameters change. The yield stress value of this model provides a good estimation of real yield stress which is a key parameter for mixture behavior. These considerations are very useful to characterize, predict, and compare various mud flows.

Key words

Yield stress rheometry suspensions mud natural clay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Petroleum Institute (API) (1982) Standard procedure for testing drilling fluid. A.P.I. Bull 13B, 9th Ed., Dallas, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Colin F (1970) Application of rheometry to sewage sludge study. La Tribune du Centre Belge d'Etude et de Documentation des Eaux, No. 317, 23:178–187 (in French)Google Scholar
  3. Coussot P, Piau J-M (1993) Simple shear rheometry of concentrated dispersions and suspensions. Les Cahiers de rhéologie, Vol X11, No 1:1–13 (in French)Google Scholar
  4. Coussot P, Leonov AI, Piau J-M (1993) Rheology of concentrated dispersed systems in a low molecular weight matrix. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 46:179–217Google Scholar
  5. Coussot P (1992) Debris flow rheology — Study of concentrated suspensions — Thèse de Doctorat de l'Institut National Polytechnique, Grenoble, France, 420 p (in French)Google Scholar
  6. de Gennes PG (1985) Continuum and discontinuum: the percolation. Encyclopedia Universalis, Symposium: Les Enjeux, pp 313–318 (in French)Google Scholar
  7. Firth BA, Hunter RJ (1976) Flow properties of coagulated suspensions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 57:248–275Google Scholar
  8. Hu G, Fang Z (1985) Antithixotropic model for fluid with hyperconcentration of sediment, Proceedings of International Workshop on Flow at Hyperconcentrations of Sediment. September 10–14, Beijing, China, 1.3, pp 1–9, IRTCES PublicationGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunter RJ (1982) The flow behavior of coagulated colloidal suspensions. Advances in Colloid Interface Science, 17:197–211Google Scholar
  10. Huifang Z, Low PF, Bradford JM (1991) Effects of pH and electrolyte concentration on particle interaction in three homoionic sodium soil clay suspensions. Soil Science, No 3, 151:196–207Google Scholar
  11. Locat J, Demers D (1988) Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships of sensitive clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, No 4, 25:799–806Google Scholar
  12. M'Ewen MB, Pratt MI (1957) The gelation of montmorillonite. Part I: The formation of a structural framework in sols of Wyoming bentonite. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 53:535–547Google Scholar
  13. M'Ewen MB, Mould DL (1957) The gelation of montmorillonite. Part II: The nature of interparticle forces in sols of Wyoming bentonite. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 53:548–564Google Scholar
  14. Magnin A, Piau JM (1987) Shear rheometry of fluids with a yield stress. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 23:91–106Google Scholar
  15. Magnin A, Piau JM (1990) Cone-and-plate rheometry of yield stress fluids — Study of an aqueous gel. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 36:85–108Google Scholar
  16. Major JJ, Pierson TC (1992) Debris flow rheology: experimental analysis of fine-grained slurries. Water Resources Research, No 3, 28:841–857Google Scholar
  17. Major JJ, Pierson TC (1990) Rheological analysis of fine-grained natural debris-flow material, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Hydraulics and Hydrology of Arid Lands. ASCE, San Diego, California, US, pp 225–231Google Scholar
  18. Melton IE, Rand B (1977) Particle interactions in aqueous kaolinite suspensions — Part I: Effect of pH and electrolyte upon the mode of particle interaction in homoionic sodium kaolinite suspensions —Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, No 2, 60:308–336Google Scholar
  19. Migniot C (1989) Bedding-down and rheology of muds. La Houille Blanche 1:11–29, 2:95–111 (in French)Google Scholar
  20. Moore F (1959) The rheology of cereamic slips and bodies. Transactions of the British Ceramic Society, 58:470–484Google Scholar
  21. Nguyen QD, Boger DV (1992) Measuring the flow properties of yield stress fluids. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 24:47–88Google Scholar
  22. O'Brien JS, Julien PY (1988) Laboratory analysis of mud-flow properties. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, No 8, 114:877–887Google Scholar
  23. O'Brien JS (1986) Physical processes, rheology and modeling of mud flows. Ph. D., Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 154pGoogle Scholar
  24. Pazwash H, Robertson JM (1971) Fluid dynamic consideration of bottom materials. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, No 9, 97:1317–1329Google Scholar
  25. Phillips CP (1988) Rheological investigations of debris flow materials, Ph.D.. University of Canterbury, Lincoln College, New Zealand, 210pGoogle Scholar
  26. Qian N, Wan Z (1986) A critical review of the research on the hyperconcentrated flow in China. International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation publication, China, 43pGoogle Scholar
  27. Rand B, Pekenc E, Goodwin JW, Smith RW (1980) Investigation into the existence of edge-face coagulated structures in Na-montmorillonite suspensions. Journal of the Chemical Society and Faraday Transactions 76:225–235Google Scholar
  28. Sachettini M, Magnin A, Piau JM, Pierrard JM (1985) Transient viscometric flows of a lubricating grease. Journal de Mécanique Théorique et Appliquée, Special publication devoted to suspensions. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 165–199 (in French)Google Scholar
  29. Speers RA, Holme KR, Tung MA, Williamson WT (1987) Drilling fluid shear stress overshoot behavior, Rheologica Acta 26:447–452Google Scholar
  30. Thomas DG (1963) Non-Newtonian suspensions — Part I: Physical properties and laminar transport characteristics. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, No 11, 55:18–29Google Scholar
  31. Tsenoglou C (1990) Scaling concepts in suspension rheology. Journal of Rheology, 34(1):15–24Google Scholar
  32. Van Olphen H (1977) Introduction to clay colloid chemistry. Wiley and Sons, New York, 2nd editionGoogle Scholar
  33. Vinogradov GV, Froishteter GB, Trilisky KK (1978) The generalized theory of flow of plastic disperse systems with account of wall effect. Rheologica Acta 17:156–165Google Scholar
  34. Wan Z (1982) Bed material movement in hyperconcentrated flow, Series Paper 31, Inst. of Hydrodynamics and Hydr. Eng., Tech. Univ. of DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  35. Wildemuth CR, Williams MC (1985) A new interpretation of viscosity and yield stress in dense slurries: coal and other irregular particles. Rheologica Acta 24:75–91Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Coussot
    • 1
  • J. M. Piau
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de RhéologieDomaine UniversitaireGrenoble Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations