Mycopathologia

, Volume 133, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

Seasonal study of the fungal biota of the fur of dogs

  • F. J. Cabañes
  • Ma L. Abarca
  • Ma R. Bragulat
  • G. Castellá
Article

Abstract

During a one year period, 944 dogs from the Municipal kennel of Barcelona were examined to detect animals with suspected dermatophytosis. Only a few animals (1.8%) presented skin lesions but none of them had dermatophytosis. A representative number of dogs without visible skin lesions (n=172), selected at random, were used to carry out a seasonal study of the mycobiota of their fur. Fifteen isolates belonging to the genera Microsporum and Trichophyton were isolated from 14 of the 172 (8.1%) dogs without lesions. The identity of these fungi was Microsporum gypseum (6/15), Trichophyton terrestre (4/15), M. canis (2/15), M. cookei (2/15) and Trichophyton ajelloi (1/15) (one strain each of M. gypseum and T. ajelloi were isolated from one dog). Species of Penicillium (% prevalence=89.5%), Alternaria (86.6%), Cladosporium (84.9%), Aspergillus (77.3%), Scopulariopsis (65.7%) and Chrysosporium (64.5%) were the most prevalent. No significant differences in the fungal biota were observed with respect to age, gender, hair length or between mixed and pure breed dogs. A large number of isolates, including species belonging to the genera Beauveria, Chrysosporium, Malbranchea and Scopulariopsis, that macroscopically and/or microscopically resemble dermatophytes and may be mistaken for them, produced a red color change in Dermatophyte Test Medium. No significant seasonal difference was detected among the isolates belonging to the the most frequently encountered genera, with the exception of Scopulariopsis (higher in summer and autumn) and Chrysosporium (higher in summer). Species from other genera, with lower occurrence also presented significant differences in their seasonal distribution. Arthrinium, Aureobasidium, Chaetomium and Phoma spp. presented maximum prevalence peaks in spring, Fusarium, Paecilomyces, Phoma and Rhizopus spp. in summer and Geotrichum and Mucor spp. in autumn. The Microsporum and Trichophyton species were more frequently isolated in summer.

Key words

Dermatophytes Dogs Fur Moulds Mycobiota Seasonal study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aho R. Studies on fungal flora in hair from domestic and laboratory animals suspected of dermatophytosis. I. Dermatophytes. Acta Path Microb Scand Sect B 1980; 88: 79–83.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stenwig H. Isolation of dermatophytes from domestic animals in Norway. Nord Vet Med 1985; 37: 161–169.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cutsem J van, Keyser H de, Rochette F, Flaes M van der. Survey of fungal isolates from alopecic and asymptomatic dogs. Vet Rec 1985; 116: 568–569.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faggi E, Saponetto N, Sagone M. Dermatophytes isoles des carnivores domestiques a Florence (Italie): enquete epidemiologique. Bull Soc Fr Mycol Med 1987; 16: 297–301.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wright AI. Ringworm in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 1989; 30: 242–249.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis DT, Foil CS, Hosgood G. Epidemiology and clinical features of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats at Louisiana State University: 1981–1990. Vet Dermatol 1991; 2: 53–58.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sparkes AH, Gruffydd-Jones TJ, Shaw SE, Wright AI, Stokes CR. Epidemiological and diagnostic features of canine and feline dermatophytosis in the United Kingdom from 1956 to 1991. Vet Rec 1993; 133: 57–61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chermette R, Pinard M, Bussieras S. Les dermatophytes des carnivores domestiques. Resultats d'enquête épidémiologique en region parisienne. Bull Soc Fr Mycol Med 1985; 14: 47–50.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zaror L, Fischmann O, Borges M, Vilanova A, Levites J. The role of cats and dogs in the epidemiological cycle of Microsporum canis. Mykosen 1985; 29: 185–188.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Komarek J, Wurst Z. The dermatophytes of clinically healthy dogs and cats. Veter Med (Praha) 1989; 34: 59–63. [in Czech, English summary].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aho R. Saprophytic fungi isolated from the hair of domestic and laboratory animals with suspected dermatophytosis. Mycopathologia 1983; 83: 65–73.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Philpot CM, Berry AP. The normal fungal flora of dogs. Mycopathologia 1984; 87: 155–157.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rebell G, Taplin D. Dermatophytes, their recognition and identification. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gambale W, Larsson CE, Moritami MM, Correa B, Paula CR, Framil VMDS. Dermatophytes and other fungi of the haircoat of cats without dermatophytosis in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Feline Pract 1993; 21: 29–33.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moriello KA, Deboer DJ. Fungal flora of the haircoat of cats with and without dermatophytosis. J Med Vet Mycol 1991; 29: 285–292.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aho R. Studies on zoophilic dermatophytes and contaminant fungi of the skin with special reference to mycological characterization. [Dissertation]. Helsinki, Finland: College of Veterinary Medicine, 1988 (ISBN 952-90002-8-6).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moriello KA, Deboer DJ. Fungal flora of the coat of pet cats. Am J Vet Res 1991; 52: 602–606.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. J. Cabañes
    • 1
  • Ma L. Abarca
    • 1
  • Ma R. Bragulat
    • 1
  • G. Castellá
    • 1
  1. 1.Departament de Patologia i de Producció AnimalsUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations