Skip to main content
Log in

Solving a linear multiperiod portfolio problem by interior-point methodology

  • Published:
Computer Science in Economics and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this report we formulate a linear multiperiod programming problem and show how it can be solved by a new interior point algorithm. The conditions of convergence and applicability of the algorithm of centers are explicitly connected to the multiperiod programming problem. For the former, effective application is supported by a set of simplifying conditions stated and proved in the text. For the latter, boundedness and nontriviality under real world conditions is demonstrated, allowing for its solution by the interior point algorithm. The use of a fast interior point algorithm is motivated by some empirical evidence from a Revised Simplex optimizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abhyankar, S., Morin, T.L., and Trafalis, S., 1989, Efficient faces of polytopes: Interior point algorithms, parameterization of algebraic varieties and multiple objective optimization, Computational Combinatorics, Purdue University, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, D. and Lagarias, J., 1986, Geometry of linear programming: I, II & III, Technical reports, Department of Mathematics, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J.R. and Oi, L., 1988, Computing block-angular Karmarkar projections with applications to stochastic programming, Management Sci. 34 (12), 1472–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chankong, V. and Haimes, Y., 1983, Multiobjective Decision Making. Theory and Methodology, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, M.C. and Philpott, A.B., 1988, On the performance of Karmarkar's algorithm, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 39(3), 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, G. and Morin, T., 1984, Steepest ascent algorithms for nonconical multiple objective programming, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 100, 188–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, J.N., 1986, Karmarkar's linear programming, Algorithm Interfaces 16(4), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.L. and Masud, A.S., 1979, Multiple Objective Decision Making. Methods and Applications, New York.

  • Karmarkar, N., 1984, A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming, Combinatorica 4, 373–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasanen, E. and Östermark, R., 1987, The managerial viewpoint in interactive programming with multiple objectives, Kybernetes 16, 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khachian, L. G., 1979, A polynomial algorithm for linear programming, Dokl Akad. Nauk SSSR, 244, 1093–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. and Raiffa, H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, A., 1987, A dynamic bank portfolio planning model with multiple scenarios, multiple goals and changing priorities, European J. Oper. Res. 30, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, T.L. and Trafalis, T.B., 1988, Interior point methods in multiple objective optimization, Joint National ORSA/TIMS Meeting, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Nakayama, H., 1988, An interactive support system for bond trading, Department of Applied Mathematics, Konan University, Discussion Paper presented at the VIIIth International Congress on MCDM, Manchester, England, August 1988.

  • Östermark, R., 1991, Vector forecasting and dynamic portfolio selection. Empirical efficiency of recursive multiperiod strategies, European J. Oper. Res. 55, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renegar, J., 1986, A polynomial-time algorithm, based on Newton's method, for linear programming, Report 07118-86, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales, L.E., 1985, Introduction to Non-Linear Optimiztion, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S., 1982, Matrix Algebra, Useful for Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnevend, G., 1985, An analytical center for polyhedrons and new classes of global algorithms for linear (smooth, convex) programming, Proc. 12th IFIP Conference on Systems Modelling, Budapest, 1985.

  • Steuer, R., 1986, Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, R.M., 1987, A locally well-behaved potential function and a simple Newton-type method for finding the center of a polytope, Technical Report AT&AT Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A., 1986, On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characteristions to vector optimization problems, OR Spectrum 2, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and Zeleny, M., 1975, The set of all nondominated solutions in linear cases and a multicriteria simplex method J. Math. Anal. Appl. 49, 430–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., 1982, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Östermark, R. Solving a linear multiperiod portfolio problem by interior-point methodology. Computer Science in Economics and Management 5, 283–302 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436583

Key words

Navigation