Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative studies on the postantifungal effect produced by the synergistic interaction of flucytosine and amphotericin B on Candida albicans

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A turbidometric method was used to measure Candida albicans yeast cell growth and to quantitate the postantifungal effect (PAFE) after exposure to various concentrations of flucytosine and amphotericin B, alone and in combination, for 2 hr at 30°C. The drug concentrations used in the PAFE assays were determined by initial MIC and FIC (fractional inhibitory concentration) evaluations. The PAFE was calculated by the difference in time (hr) required for growth of the control and test cultures to reach the 0.5 absorbance level following removal of the drug by dilution. A synergistic PAFE was evidenced with combinations of the two drugs at concentrations below their individual MICs. Combinations of flucytosine (0.012 to 0.049 μg ml−1) and amphotericin B (0.195 to 0.39 μg ml−1) produced PAFEs ranging from 6.3 to 21.8 hr. These PAFEs persisted from 0.3 to 14.7 hr longer than those achieved when each of the two agents was assayed separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scalarone GM, Mikami Y, Kurita N, Yazawa K, Miyaji M. Postantifungal effect of 5-fluorocytosine on Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992; 29: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scalarone GM, Mikami Y, Kurita N, Ichihara Y, Yazawa K, Miyaji M. Turbidometric characterization of the postantifungal effect: Comparative studies with amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine and miconazole on Candida albicans. Mycoses 1992; 34: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald PJ, Craig WA, Kunin CM. Persistent effect of antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus after exposure for limited periods of time. J Infect Dis 1977; 135: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bundtzen RW, Gerber AU, Cohn DL, Craig WA. Postantibiotic suppression of bacterial growth. Rev Infect Dis 1981; 3: 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber AU, Craig WA. Growth kinetics of respiratory pathogens after short exposures to ampicillin and erythromycin in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother 1981; 8: 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vogelman BS, Craig WA. Postantibiotic effects. J Antimicrob Chemother 1985; 15: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Polak A. Combination therapy for systemic mycosis. Infection 1989; 17: 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sugar AM. Interactions of amphotericin B and SCH 39304 in the treatment of experimental murine candidiasis: Lack of antagonism of a polyene-azole combination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 1669–1671.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanson LH, Perlman AM, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. Synergy between cilofungin and amphotericin B in a murine model of candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 1334–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Larsen RA, Leal MAE, Chan LS. Fluconazole compared with amphothericin B plus flucytosine for cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS. Ann Int Med 1990; 113: 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allendoerfer R, Marquis AJ, Rinaldi MG, Graybill JR. Combined therapy with fluconazole and flucytosine in murine cryptococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 726–729.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sugar AM, Goldani LZ, Picard M. Treatment of murine invasive candidiasis with amphotericin B and cilofungin: Evidence of enhanced activity with combination therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 2128–2130.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wasan KM, Vadiei K, Luke DR, Keyhani A, White RA, McQueen TJ, Mehta R, Lopez-Berenstein G. Antifungal activity of HWA-138 and amphotericin B in experimental systemic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 2046–2048.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bodey GP. Topical and systemic antifungal agents. Med Clin N Amer 1988; 72: 637–659.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stamm AM, Diasio RB, Dismukes WA, Shadomy S, Cloud GA, Bowles CA, Karam GH, Espinel-Ingroff A. Toxicity of amphotericin B plus flucytosine in 194 patients with cryptococcal meningitis. Amer J Med 1987; 83: 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mikami Y, Yazawa K, Matsumae A. Evaluation of in vitro antifungal activities of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole and miconazole on seven different antifungal assay media. Chemotherapy (Tokyo); 39: 761–770.

  17. Berenbaum MC. A method for testing for synergy with any number of agents. J Infect Dis 1978; 137: 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Odds FC. Interactions among amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, ketoconazole and miconazole against pathogenic fungi in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1982; 22: 763–770.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mikami Y, Uno J, Yazawa K, Arai T. Turbidometric characterization of growth inhibition by aztreonam, a synthetic monobactam antibiotic. Chemotherapy (Tokyo); 37: 723–730.

  20. Galgiani JN. Antifungal susceptibility tests. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 1867–1870.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scalarone, G.M., Mikami, Y., Kurita, N. et al. Comparative studies on the postantifungal effect produced by the synergistic interaction of flucytosine and amphotericin B on Candida albicans . Mycopathologia 120, 133–138 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436389

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436389

Key words

Navigation