Abstract
This paper presents some preliminary development towards a methodology for measuring power in a group purchase decision. We define power as the capacity of an individual to change the probability of an alternative being chosen by expressing an opinion about that alternative. We present a linear model that relates the group members' preferences to the probability that a given alternative will be chosen. The model parameters reflect specific measures of power and can be estimated by conjoint analysis. We present the results of a pilot field study, conducted on a sample of purchasing managers, which favorably assesses certain psychometric properties of the resulting measures for dyads.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, R. W., D. L.Madison, L. W.Porter, P. A.Renwick, and B. T.Mayes. “Organizational Politics: Tactics and Characteristics of Its Actors.” California Management Review 22 (1979), 77–83.
Bartoszynski, P. “Power Structure in Dichotomous Voting.” Econometrica 40 (1972), 1003–1019.
Bonoma, T. “Major Sales: Who Really Does the Buying?” Harvard Business Review. 60 (May–June 1982), 111–119.
Corfman, K. P., and D. R.Lehmann. “Models of Cooperative Group Decision Making and Relative Influence: An Experimental Investigation of Family Purchase Decisions.” Journal of Consumer Research 14 (1987), 1–13.
Davis, H. L. “Decision Making Within the Household.” Journal of Consumer Research 2 (March 1976), 241–260.
Filley, A. C. Interpersonal Conflict Resolution, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1975.
Fishburn, P. D., and W. V.Gehrlein. “Collective Rationality versus Distribution of Power in Binary Social Choice Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 15 (1977) 72–91.
French, J. and B.Raven. “The Bases of Social Power.” In Studies in Social Power, ed. D.Cartwright. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 150–67, 1959.
Green, P. E., and V.Srinivasan. “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook.” Journal of Consumer Research 5 (1978), 103–23.
Kaplan, A., “Power in Perspective.” In Power and Conflict in Organization, eds. R. L.Kahn and E.Boulding. London: Tavistock, 1964.
March, J. G. “The Power of Power.” In Varieties of Political Theory, ed. D.Easton. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 39–70, 1966.
Nitzan, S., and J.Paroush. Collective Decision Making: An Economic Outlook. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Pfeffer, J. Power in Organizations, Boston: Pitman, 1981.
Robinson, P. J., C. W.Faris, and Y.Wind. Industrial Buying and Creative Marketing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1967.
Silk, A. J., and M. U.Kalwani. “Measuring Influence in Organizational Purchase Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research 19 (1982), 165–81.
Steckel, J. H. “Mathematical Approaches to the Study of Power: A Critical Review.” In Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 12, eds. E. Hirschman and M. Holbrook. 577–581, 1985.
Thomas, R. J. “Correlates of Interpersonal Purchase Influence in Organizations.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (September 1982), 171–182.
Turk, J. L., and N. W.Bell. “Measuring Power in Families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 34 (1972), 215–22.
Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press, 1947.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steckel, J.H., O'Shaughnessy, J. Towards a new way to measure power: Applying conjoint analysis to group decisions. Market Lett 1, 37–46 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436147
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436147