Abstract
Previous research has suggested that consumers use multiple strands to evaluate their satisfaction with a product and to establish postpurchase behavioral intention. However, prior empirical research has focused on which individual standard best predicts satisfaction. In contrast, this article develops and tests a model of consumer satisfaction and postpurchase behavioral intention in which consumers simultaneously use multiple standards—perceptions of performance, brand expectations, and category expectations. The results of an experiment for a simulated service encounter provide support for the proposition that consumers use multiple standards and that these standards have differential effects on such postpurchase outcomes as satisfaction, repurchase intention, and willingness to recommend. Brand expectations are shown to be better predictors of affective outcomes (such as satisfaction), while category expectations are shown to be better predictors of behavioral outcomes (repurchase and recommendation). Consistent with prior research, perceived performance is shown to have a strong effect on both satisfaction and behavioral intention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, Eugene W., and Mary W.Sullivan. (1993). “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms”. Marketing Science 12 (Spring), 125–143.
Boulding, William, AjayKalra, RichardStaelin, and Valeria A.Zeithaml (1993). “A Dynamic process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions”. Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February), 7–27.
Business International. (1990). Maximizing Customer Satisfaction: Meeting Demands of the New Global Marketplace. New York: Business International Corporation.
Cadotte, Ernest R., Robert B.Woodruff, and Roger L.Jenkins. (1987). “Expectations and Norms in Models of Consumer Satisfaction”. Journal of Marketing Research 24 (August), 305–314.
Cardozo, Richard N. (1965). “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation and Satisfaction”. Journal of Marketing Research 2 (August), 244–249.
Churchill, Gilbert A., and CarolSuprenant. (1982). “An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction”. Journal of Marketing Research 19 (November), 491–504.
Day, Ralph L. (1977). “Toward a Process Model of Consumer Satisfaction”. In H. KeithHunt (Ed.), Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction. (pp. 153–183). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Farquhar, Peter H., and Anthony R. Pratkanis. (1987). “Phantom Choices: The Effects of Unavailable Alternatives on Decision Making”. Working Paper, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Fornell, Claes. (1992). “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience”. Journal of Marketing 56 (January), 6–21.
Helson, Harry. (1964). Adaptation Level Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Hunt, H. Keith (1977). “SC/D: Overview and Future Research Directions”. In H. KeithHunt (Ed.), Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction (pp. 455–488). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Johnson, Michael D., and ClaesFornell (1991). “A Framework for Comparing Customer Satisfaction Across Individuals and Product Categories”. Journal of Economic Psychology 12, 267–286.
LaTour, Stephen A. and Nancy C.Peat (1979), “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Consumer Satisfaction Research”, in Advances in Consumer Research, v 6, ed. William L.Wilkie, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 431–437.
Loro, Lara (1992), “Customer Is Always Right, Satisfaction Research Booms”, Advertising Age, February 10, 25.
Miller, John A. (1977), “Studying Satisfaction, Modifying Models, Eliciting Expectations, Posing Problems, and Making Meaningful Measurements”, in Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, ed. H. KeithHunt, Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 72–91.
Oliver, Richard L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions”, Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (November), 460–469.
Olson, Jerry C. and Phillip A.Dover (1979), “Disconfirmation of Consumer Expectations through Product Trial”, Journal of Applied Psychology, v 64, n 2, 179–189.
Parsuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml and Leonard L. Barry (1984), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research”, Marketing Science Institute Report No. 84-106, August, Cambridge, MA.
Parsuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml and Leonard L. Barry (1986), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality”, Marketing Science Institute Report No. 86-108, August, Cambridge, MA.
Peter, J. Paul, Gilbert A.Churchill, and Tom J.Brown (1993), “Caution in the Use of Difference Scores in Consumer Research”, Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (March), 655–662.
Thibaut, John W. and Harold H.Kelly (1959), The Social Psychology of Groups. John Wiley, New York, NY.
Tse, David K. and Peter C.Wilton (1988), “Models of Consumer Satisfaction Formation: An Extension”, Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (May), 204–212.
Wall, Majorie, Lois Dickey, and Wayne Talarzyk (1979), “Correlates of Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Clothing Purchase”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, (Summer), 104–115.
Woodruff, Robert B., Ernest R.Cadotte and Roger L.Jenkins (1983), “Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms”, Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (August) 296–304.
Zaichkowsky, Judith L. (1985) “Measuring the Involvement Construct”. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (December), 341–352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, K., Stewart, D.W. Customer satisfaction and customer behavior: The differential role of brand and category expectations. Market Lett 7, 249–263 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435741
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435741