Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the effects of a line extension or new brand introduction on market structure

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Market structure has been characterized by the locations of brands in the perceptual space of households (perceptual map) and the importance weights associated with the attributes of this map. It is hypothesized that a line extension or a new brand introduced into this market could potentially affect the brand locations or the importance weights. We show how a simple extension of a recent approach to market structure analysis enables us to empirically identify which, if any, of these two aspects of market structure is affected by the line extension or new brand. An empirical application to the detergent product market is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carpenter, G., and K.Nakamoto. (1989). “Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage”. Journal of Marketing Research 26, 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1980). “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data”. Review of Economic Studies 47, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, R., and V. Ramaswamy. (1994). “A Simultaneous Approach to Preference Segmentation and Assessment of New Product Trial.” Working paper, University of Michigan.

  • Chintagunta, P. K. (1994). “Heterogeneous Logit Model Implications for Brand Positioning”. Journal of Marketing Research 31, 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, P. K. (1995). “Investigating the Impact of a New Brand Introduction Using Household and Store Level Panel Data.” Working paper, Cornell University.

  • Chintagunta, P. K., and Bo E.Honore. (1996). “Investigating the Effects of Marketing Variables and Unobserved Heterogeneity in a Multinomial Probit Model”. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, T., and M. P.Keane. (1995). “A Factor-Analytic Probit Model for Market Structure Analysis”. Journal of Marketing Research 32, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, P., and B. Hardie. (1996). “Modeling Consumer Choice Among SKUs.” Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Grover, R., and V.Srinivasan. (1992). “Reflections on ‘A Simultaneous Approach to Market Segmentation and Market Structuring.’” Journal of Marketing Research 29, 474–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D., and J.Snell. (1988). “Predicting Utility.” In Robin, Hogarth (ed.), Insights in Decision Making. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing Management. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel. (1976). “Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5(4), 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, Sridhar, and P.Papatla. (1996). “Is There a Presence Effect from Line Extensions?” Working paper, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J., and Becker, G. S. (1977). “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandem.” American Economic Review 67, 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chintagunta, P.K. Investigating the effects of a line extension or new brand introduction on market structure. Market Lett 7, 319–328 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435539

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435539

Key words

Navigation